On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:44:28PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> static int regulator_check_consumers(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + struct regulator *ignore,
>int *min_uV, int *max_uV)
This feels really invasive, and prone
On 12/20/10 04:39, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:44:28PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
static int regulator_check_consumers(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+struct regulator *ignore,
int *min_uV, int *max_uV)
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:27:40PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> I agree it looks a bit odd and I'm willing to do the code reorg if
> there is a better way. But I definitely wouldn't call this as
See the suggestion I made in the previous mail - try doing it by making
the change, then backing it
