Le 1 févr. 08 à 23:17, alex stone a écrit :
> Stephane,
> I am pleased to try this out, and have just installed jack1.09, and
> jackdmp. System runs fine at the moment, but i seem to have lost
> duplex. It may almost certainly be user error, so i'll sort this
> out and get back to you with
Stephane,
I am pleased to try this out, and have just installed jack1.09, and jackdmp.
System runs fine at the moment, but i seem to have lost duplex. It may
almost certainly be user error, so i'll sort this out and get back to you
with a more detailed report on what's happening.
But for the first
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 19:36 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2008 schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:53:18PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > > Another requisite: The volume-control has to have a linear response over
> > > the whole frequency spectrum you use
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Won't be easy I'd think. Both resampling and fractional
> sample delay lead to the same problem with different
> constraints - interpolation.
Sure. But what I meant is that it will then at least be possible to
interface to such algorithms, whereas now there's no way to dea
Stéphane Letz wrote:
> The LLVM backend based approach may improve the situation : http://
> www.grame.fr/~letz/faust_llvm.html, the day it will work ((-:
That will enable you to skip the C++ compilation, but Faust still does a
lot of stuff behind the scenes, rewriting expressions to normal form,
Le 1 févr. 08 à 19:52, Kjetil S. Matheussen a écrit :
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Albert Graef wrote:
>
>> Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>>> The last sentence was extremely bad formulated. I ment that
>>> the syntax for accessing faust needs to be different, because
>>> programming in snd is s-expression
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:37:33PM +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
> > But what about resampling? The main main signal usually needs to
> > be resampled up 5-10 times to get a decent sound. Can I do that
> > with faust? Something like:
> >
> > process = resample(5,d)
>
> I want that, too. :) There's
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Albert Graef wrote:
> Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> > The last sentence was extremely bad formulated. I ment that
> > the syntax for accessing faust needs to be different, because
> > programming in snd is s-expressions based.
>
> So what you need is an unparser for s-expressi
Le 1 févr. 08 à 18:22, alex stone a écrit :
> As a complete aside to the gaiety and good natured frollocking
> going in the GPL discussion, I'm writing to say thanks to Stephane
> and the Jackdmp team.
> I've installed the latest incarnation (0.69), and it works a treat.
> The system's neve
Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> The last sentence was extremely bad formulated. I ment that
> the syntax for accessing faust needs to be different, because
> programming in snd is s-expressions based.
So what you need is an unparser for s-expressions that produces Faust's
infix syntax, this shouldn'
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2008 schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:53:18PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > Another requisite: The volume-control has to have a linear response over
> > the whole frequency spectrum you use and must not add any noise and has
> > to have reproducible ove
Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> Thanks, that was simple.
Beware, I haven't tested that code. :)
> But what about resampling? The main main signal usually needs to
> be resampled up 5-10 times to get a decent sound. Can I do that
> with faust? Something like:
>
> process = resample(5,d)
I want tha
Fons Adriaensen:
>
>> You can be as much of a professional user as you want to.
>> It doesn't change the fact that other professionals might
>> not want the system to behave like you do.
>
>Which again means it should be configurable.
Absolutely. I think a new function for jack would be
better th
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:53:18PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Another requisite: The volume-control has to have a linear response over the
> whole frequency spectrum you use and must not add any noise and has to have
> reproducible overall-volume-settings. That is where it really starts to ge
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:28:55PM +0100, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> You can be as much of a professional user as you want to.
> It doesn't change the fact that other professionals might
> not want the system to behave like you do.
Which again means it should be configurable.
BTW, JSB may tur
Am Freitag, 1. Februar 2008 schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
> I invite you to come to Parma and design a 176-channel volume
> control, to be put between the sound cards and the amps, that
> I can turn down when starting an app that might autoconnect.
> If it works, and if it doesn't make a mess of the cal
Fons Adriaensen:
> Well, for the record, I am a professional user in every sense
> of the word you could imagine. I'm being paid to design and
> develop audio systems running on Linux, and that is my main
> source of income.
>
> If it works, and if it doesn't make a mess of the calibrated
> gain
As a complete aside to the gaiety and good natured frollocking going in the
GPL discussion, I'm writing to say thanks to Stephane and the Jackdmp team.
I've installed the latest incarnation (0.69), and it works a treat. The
system's never run so well.
Thanks fellas, your skill and determination is
Has anyone had a chance to look at this?
http://www.sgi.com/products/software/react/linux_overview.html
Does anyone know if it really adds any capabilities other than some
debugging tools over regular real time linux?
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Li
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:14:10PM +0100, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> Don't say "pro user" when you actually mean a person who very often
> either has a very complicated jack setup, or someone who has connected
> their monitors directly to their loudspeakers. I consider myself
> a pro user, but
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Darren Landrum wrote:
> Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> > Thanks, that was simple. I'll try figuring out the rest myself.
> > But what about resampling? The main main signal usually needs to
> > be resampled up 5-10 times to get a decent sound. Can I do that
> > with faust? Somet
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> fucntions to get a convenient speed boost for dsp processing. A few
> modifications to the faust syntax will be necesarry though to make
> it work in s-expressions, but it shouldn't be so hard.
>
The last sentence was extremely bad formulated. I
Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> Thanks, that was simple. I'll try figuring out the rest myself.
> But what about resampling? The main main signal usually needs to
> be resampled up 5-10 times to get a decent sound. Can I do that
> with faust? Something like:
>
> process = resample(5,d)
I'm quite cu
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:14:05 -0500
Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 18:52 +, pete shorthose wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:11:55 -0500
> > Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:24 +, pete shorthose wrote:
> > > Um.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Albert Graef wrote:
> Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> > The second problem (besides its lack of interactivity) I have about faust
> > is that is purely functional. I have programmed lots of code in purely
> > functional style, and I like it very much, so thats not the issue. Bu
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
>> The simple solution is just to make jack aware, somehow, that
>> sometimes the client softwares wants to autoconnect, and that
>> there must be a way to turn that off.
>
> And a way tell where exactly it should be
Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> The simple solution is just to make jack aware, somehow, that
> sometimes the client softwares wants to autoconnect, and that
> there must be a way to turn that off.
And a way tell where exactly it should be autoconnected, if it's
enabled. In certain cases, it's not
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>> Fons Adriaensen:
>>> - My usual grunge: unless you want me accidentally
>>> destroy some very expensive equipment which is not
>>> even mine, the generated JACK apps
>>>
>>> MUST NOT AUTOCONNECT --- NEVER --- TO
[Paul Davis]
>On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 08:14 +0100, Yann Orlarey wrote:
>
>> The minimal combination to activate FTZ mode seems to be :
>>
>> "-O3 -march=native -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math"
>>
>> when you are on a sse capable cpu. Here it works, you don't have
>> denormals any more :-).
>
>Ardour tak
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:06:07AM +0100, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>> - The apps also autosave their state to $HOME/.***rc.
>> Any way to disable this ?
>
> If you want to change that kind behaviour for now,
> ...
One man's 'kind behaviour' is another one's bug.
Just received a mail from on of the
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 08:14 +0100, Yann Orlarey wrote:
> The minimal combination to activate FTZ mode seems to be :
>
> "-O3 -march=native -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math"
>
> when you are on a sse capable cpu. Here it works, you don't have
> denormals any more :-).
Ardour takes manual control of FTZ
31 matches
Mail list logo
