On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:12:55PM +1000, porl sheean wrote:
i've just finished compiling the 2.6.26.3 kernel with the readltime
patch from above, and i am having no problems with a firewire saffire
pro card using ffado. i haven't tried midi though, so i can't comment
there. i can't
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:39:27PM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:12:55PM +1000, porl sheean wrote:
i've just finished compiling the 2.6.26.3 kernel with the readltime
patch from above, and i am having no problems with a firewire saffire
pro card using ffado. i
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:39:27PM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 01:12:55PM +1000, porl sheean wrote:
i've just finished compiling the 2.6.26.3 kernel with the readltime
patch from above, and i am having no problems with a firewire saffire
pro card using
Pieter Palmers wrote:
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi guys.
Pieter Palmers wrote:
I'm sorry, but the following statement:
Here’s a few vids of the mighty power of hydrogen explosions. Not an
endorsement of nuclear power but just a reference for anyone who is
doubting the energy
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
However I am slightly concerned at the closed
attitude that I was presented with by people I have worked with for over
ten years and found in general to be quite open minded about ideas that
may or may not be mainstream.
I suggest that many of these people would
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 17:33 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Now it really is time to STFU on this issue on this list.
What issue Eric?
The mighty power of c compared to the inferiority of c++?
People in glass houses...
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
Hi,
After the latest Intel announcment that they are indeed working
seriously on wireless electricity uses resonance to transmit hte energy
sources I am wondering if anyone has ideas on whether that would affect
audio quality as resonance is an important part of the ambience of live
sound.
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Interesting pov,
I assume you use electricity as you are typing on a computer. Unless you
have a way to transmit your emails by thought.
So since linux audio development is performed on computers then
discussion about word processing on windows is also appropriate
for
Reading concerns about audio quality and intel in one mail sure raised
some interest here. Selling worse audio quality as the new high-definition is
probably one of their biggest successes.
Am Montag, 25. August 2008 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
After the latest Intel
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:03 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Arnold Krille wrote:
Well, there _could_ be some interference as the air around you contains
some
water (called humidity). It could be possible that the electromagnetic
waves
(a) heat up the water making the room you
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I still have a feeling it will subtly influence the audio quality of a
room.
Science is not about feelings.
I have doubt about the effect it will have on electrical equipment due
to static RF as we are not dealing with rf signals in this case.
I guarantee that if
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 19:47 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I still have a feeling it will subtly influence the audio quality of a
room.
Science is not about feelings.
Ahh but music is...
I have doubt about the effect it will have on electrical equipment
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 11:32 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
I have doubt about the effect it will have on electrical equipment due
to static RF as we are not dealing with rf signals in this case.
Electrical equipment is not only sensible to the range you might be referring
here as radio
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Hi,
After the latest Intel announcment that they are indeed working
seriously on wireless electricity uses resonance to transmit hte energy
sources I am wondering if anyone has ideas on whether that would affect
audio quality as resonance is an important part of the
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:26 +0100, Gordon J. C. Pearce wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Hi,
After the latest Intel announcment that they are indeed working
seriously on wireless electricity uses resonance to transmit hte energy
sources I am wondering if anyone has ideas on whether that
On Monday 25 August 2008 05:47:26 am Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I guarantee that if you stick poorly sheilded audio equipment next to
high (or even moderate) power RF equipment you will get RF interference
in the audio.
I can sure vouch for the truth of this. Been in enough high-power
On Monday 25 August 2008 07:36:30 am Patrick Shirkey wrote:
It uses resonant frequencies at specific levels not radio frequencies.
And what exactly do you think 'radio frequencies' *are*, if they're
not 'resonant frequencies at specific levels'? (More commonly, a set of such
signals, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 18:01 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Interesting pov,
[cut]
I enjoy many off of topic threads on linuxaudio.org and like the
diversity of both FLOSS, Music and social issues;
Patrick Shirkey, mused, then expounded:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:26 +0100, Gordon J. C. Pearce wrote:
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
I'm *not* one of the people who objects to mobile phones, but I wouldn't
have one of these things anywhere near.
I don't think you will have much choice as the
On Monday 25 August 2008, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 11:32 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
I have doubt about the effect it will have on electrical equipment due
to static RF as we are not dealing with rf signals in this case.
Electrical equipment is not only sensible to the
On Monday 25 August 2008 11:38:44 am Gene Heskett wrote:
This discussion is off topic, and occasionally hillarious due to the BS
content. And I do enjoy a good BS session from time to time. Usually over
a 6 pack of suds, but that is another time place.
This whole thread reminds me of a
I am doing some preliminary testing of CUDA for audio, Version 2 (final)
has been out for a couple of days, and this is also what I am using.
In order to get anything done, one will always have to do something else
first, here: Get some data transferred to the board. Surprisingly this
appears to
Jussi Laako wrote:
Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
just tested 2.6.23.3-rt3 here with NO_HZ not set in my (old) pentium4
desktop.
it just confirmed that NO_HZ is not the culprit here. midi events are
still being delivered *completely* out of time and the funny thing is
it just gets somewhat
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 14:56 +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Hi Dan,
why don't you answer on the mailing list?
I thought I had!
That is a fairly common approach, one thread per core is good. I have
code that reads audio, sample rate converts it, time-stretches it if
appropriate and
Dan Mills, mused, then expounded:
Wireless power transmission by low frequency resonant coupling **IS** a
useful trick in some circumstances (I have seen it used to charge hand
lamps for use in explosive atmospheres for example (Well over ten years
back)), and in intels case could be used to
25 matches
Mail list logo
