Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> Well well, all that was asked for was somewhere to register a SIP
> connection without a lot of to do. Anyone?
I've been using VoipCheap for quite a while with Twinkle and other SIP
clients. Service is free for SIP calls, you only pay (sometimes ;-) )
when calling phone
Nicola Larosa wrote:
> FEI (For Everyone's Info), while SIP is a standard and interoperable
> protocol, Skype is a proprietary protocol and app, and being a peer-to-
> peer system, it uses your bandwidth for other calls too.
This is true, and IMO, XMPP/Jingle is even better standard. Downside of
Hi every one.
This is my first mail to the list.
Hope I can help you as well.
I am using the fftw3 library to implement a transform in a array of 5120
elements .
I have this array from a program that I created modifying the arecord
program.
If someone could gimme a little help solving that prob
On Saturday 25 July 2009, Jussi Laako wrote:
And yes, I'm hijacking, sorry.
>Nicola Larosa wrote:
>> FEI (For Everyone's Info), while SIP is a standard and interoperable
>> protocol, Skype is a proprietary protocol and app, and being a peer-to-
>> peer system, it uses your bandwidth for other cal
Hi,
After numerous back and forth emails with the Impro-Visor guy I realized
there was no way to get through to him. This was even after a number of
people on the Yahoo group for the program sided with him and I set them
straight on the facts. Each one of them changed their position, but this
guy
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Guilherme
Longo wrote:
> Hi every one.
> This is my first mail to the list.
> Hope I can help you as well.
>
> I am using the fftw3 library to implement a transform in a array of 5120
> elements .
> I have this array from a program that I created modifying the areco
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After numerous back and forth emails with the Impro-Visor guy I realized
> there was no way to get through to him. This was even after a number of
> people on the Yahoo group for the program sided with him and I set them
> straight on the facts. E
On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:09:26 you wrote:
>
> While you have every right to fork the code, one quibble I have (most
> likely just with your wording) is where you say that they are
> obligated to provide the binary. They have no such obligation
> whatsoever. If they provide a binary they are obli
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:09:26 you wrote:
>
>> While you have every right to fork the code, one quibble I have (most
>> likely just with your wording) is where you say that they are
>> obligated to provide the binary. They have no such obligation
>> whatsoever. If t
On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:04:05 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:09:26 you wrote:
> >> While you have every right to fork the code, one quibble I have (most
> >> likely just with your wording) is where you say that they are
> >> obligated to prov
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:04:05 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>
>> lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:09:26 you wrote:
>>>
While you have every right to fork the code, one quibble I have (most
likely just with your wording) i
On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:53:01 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> >>...
> >> The guy removed the preview version from his website.
> >> You don't have to release the source of development versions.
> >
> > Yes you do. This has been explained previously.
>
> I asked this on #gnu , they told me, it is not
Hi,
Seeing as I'm stuck at home this evening, I'm toying with the idea of
having a go at porting a LADSPA plugin to an LV2 plugin.
Looking at the official doc for LV2 I nearly ran a mile (or ten), but
Lars Luthmans "LV2 programming for the complete idiot" has me almost
convinced I might be able
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 16:23 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:53:01 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> > >>...
> > >> The guy removed the preview version from his website.
> > >> You don't have to release the source of development versions.
> > >
> > > Yes you do. This has been
On Saturday 25 July 2009 18:14:45 you wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 16:23 -0400, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:53:01 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> > > >>...
> > > >> The guy removed the preview version from his website.
> > > >> You don't have to release the source of devel
Hi,
On Sunday 26 July 2009 00:14:45 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> The idea behind GPL is that if someone else modifies the code and
> redistributes this work, he must provide the code (under the same
> license) for anyone receiving the software. That is the point of the
> license.
The main point I re
Jens M Andreasen writes:
> Any suggestions for an alternative SIP service?
Besides dialing direct, there's tons of SIP providers out there.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/VOIP+Service+Providers
--
Esben Stien is b...@e s a
http://www. s tn m
17 matches
Mail list logo
