On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Justin Smith wrote:
>>
>> I am using the fftw3 library to implement a transform in a array of 5120
>> elements .
>> I have this array from a program that I created modifying the arecord
>> program.
[snip]
>
> I don't know fftw specifically, but I am fairly certain that you nee
Hi Christoph,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Christoph Eckert wrote:
I'm currently playing with some code that sends SysEx data to ALSA using
RtMidi¹. I get an error reported by the latter one as soon as the size of the
message exceeds 16355 bytes. Unfortunately, I have such SysEx files of two
devices (
Hiho,
On Sunday 26 July 2009 16:29:45 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 15:53:30 nescivi wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:31:10 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Impro-Visor compiles in the jMusic code, which makes it even more
> > > evident that there is a violation. And the head
Hi,
I'm currently playing with some code that sends SysEx data to ALSA using
RtMidi¹. I get an error reported by the latter one as soon as the size of the
message exceeds 16355 bytes. Unfortunately, I have such SysEx files of two
devices (namely a Waldorf Microwave I and a Digitech Studio Quad)
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 15:53:30 nescivi wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:31:10 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Impro-Visor compiles in the jMusic code, which makes it even more
>>> evident that there is a violation. And the header clearly mentions
>>> using j
On Sunday 26 July 2009 15:53:30 nescivi wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:31:10 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Impro-Visor compiles in the jMusic code, which makes it even more
> > evident that there is a violation. And the header clearly mentions
> > using jMusic. So there is no mystery in whether
On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:31:10 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> Impro-Visor compiles in the jMusic code, which makes it even more
> evident that there is a violation. And the header clearly mentions
> using jMusic. So there is no mystery in whether this under GPL
> or that violations have occurred.
Unl
Dear Mr. Keller,
you gave your average interesting project a bad note by keeping the
source code closed. Why not open the source? Cross-fertilisation can
make it much more interesting, everybody could benefit from it and
you'll get deserved fame, even if it's shared fame. Just my 2 Cents. I'm
On Sunday 26 July 2009 10:52:43 you wrote:
>...
>
> By moral you are right, but by some laws you might only attain one's
> ends by diplomacy. Dunno. And I'm not diplomatic too.
Sure. You do not have to be diplomatic about everything. You have to be right
about what you are trying to accomplish. So
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 10:04:27 you wrote:
>
>> lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> I wanted to cooperate with people, but it was just too difficult for them
>>> to admit being wrong.
>>>
>> Hardened fronts needs to calm down and then to find a way out the tigh
On Sunday 26 July 2009 10:04:27 you wrote:
> lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I wanted to cooperate with people, but it was just too difficult for them
> > to admit being wrong.
>
> Hardened fronts needs to calm down and then to find a way out the tight
> corner. Everybody needs a chance, otherwise he
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
> I wanted to cooperate with people, but it was just too difficult for them to
> admit being wrong.
Hardened fronts needs to calm down and then to find a way out the tight
corner. Everybody needs a chance, otherwise he might do everything
without publishing anything and
Dave Phillips wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 19 July 2009, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If anybody is interested, I have decompiled the latest Impro-visor version,
>>> which has only been provide as a binary (in contradiction to the terms of
>>> the GPL). So if you wan
On Sunday 26 July 2009 03:14:25 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 01:20 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >...
> > The main point I remembered from the last thread with "Impro-Visor" in
> > the title: It uses gpl software itself. Which means that it has to
> > publish the modifica
On 26/7/2009, "Fons Adriaensen" wrote:
>Note that all the Mvcflpf* were designed as modules for
>AMS and that makes them somewhat special. AMS uses audio
>rate signals for modulation waveforms (envelopes etc).
Yeah, I think better start over and find a straight-forward FX plugin.
(unfortunatel
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:32:27PM +0100, james morris wrote:
> For now I've decided to tackle something relatively simple, just to get
> me introduced to working with LV2. As a first _exercise_ I'm working on
> porting the Mvclpf1 by Fons Adriaensen, to LV2.
Note that all the Mvcflpf* were desig
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:50:50PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> PS: I could still use a small channel eq, e.g. four bands with
> adjustable characteristics. lv2fil comes pretty close, but I'd like to
> change the low band to low shelf and the high band to high shelf. Nedko
> has proposed to ask Fo
On 26/7/2009, "" <> wrote:
>> 3) Any suggestions for plugins to be ported?
>
>How about autotalent? I haven't tried it, yet, but it's already LADSPA.
>Don't know if you could find any added value in making it LV2.
>
>(http://web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalent.html)
That one's new to me.
>And th
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:00 +0200, bluef wrote:
> Sampo this is not true.
This is a semi-oops. I downloaded the first file sourceforge offered me
when following the download link. This file was jMusic_1.6_inst.zip
which contains 71 .java files none of which have license declarations.
That file jus
Sampo this is not true.
The license is in every source file:
This Java Class is part of the jMusic API version 1.5, March 2004.>
Copyright (C) 2000 Andrew Sorensen & Andrew Brown
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public Li
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:40:09PM +0100, james morris wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> 3) Any suggestions for plugins to be ported?
How about autotalent? I haven't tried it, yet, but it's already LADSPA.
Don't know if you could find any added value in making it LV2.
(http://web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalen
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 11:02 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>
> > Are you assuming the whole of Impro-visor is subject to GPL as it has
> > violated the GPL of jmusic?
>
> There is a nice page on the fsf website explaining the differences between
> gpl
> and lgpl for libraries. The basic essence
Hi,
On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:14:25 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 01:20 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 July 2009 00:14:45 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> > > The idea behind GPL is that if someone else modifies the code and
> > > redistributes this work, he must provide t
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 01:20 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 26 July 2009 00:14:45 Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> > The idea behind GPL is that if someone else modifies the code and
> > redistributes this work, he must provide the code (under the same
> > license) for anyone receiving th
24 matches
Mail list logo
