Hi Alex
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:42:02 you wrote:
> I have tried the contact form on the FFADO website and through the email
> address provided in the contact pages at the SourceForge.net project page
> to no avail. I'm not sure where else to ask except here. Are any of the
> FFADO developers on thi
2009/7/30
>
> You confused the Arch User Repository (AUR) with the archaudio repo.
> I'm not yet putting my stuff into the archaudio repo.
>
> It can easily built from AUR:
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26972
>
Oh yes, silly me !
Thanks for the heads up !
Cheers.
_
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:38:01 +
LangageMachine wrote:
> 2009/7/27
>
> >
> > Thanks, it's great, I just plunked some bass through it and it's a
> > lot of fun. Arch User Repository is updated.
> >
>
> Or is it ?
> I cannot see guitarix at http://repos.archaudio.org/testing/i686/ ?
>
> Cheer
2009/7/27
>
> Thanks, it's great, I just plunked some bass through it and it's a lot
> of fun. Arch User Repository is updated.
>
Or is it ?
I cannot see guitarix at http://repos.archaudio.org/testing/i686/ ?
Cheers.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
L
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:27 +0100, james morris wrote:
> On 30/7/2009, "Damon Chaplin" wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all
> >the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed.
> >
> >I've tried the demolition test app as well. The output isn'
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:27 +0100, james morris wrote:
> Are there any similar testing tools for LV2 plugins?
>
> Although I'm familiar with gdb and valgrind, I don't know how to go
> about using these with plugins, and I guess/assume a simple host
> (perhaps one specifically designed for testin
On 30/7/2009, "Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter" wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>I'm using the lib lv2-plugin to write a plugin with c++ as you will know.
>
>Now what's the proper way to get the sample rate?
>
It's passed to the constructor of your plugin:
http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/lv2pftci/
James.
__
Hi,
On Thursday 30 July 2009 10:49:25 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > The question here is: Which ones are the broken ones and which ones the
> > good ones?
> > I wouldn't know where to look for that info, do you?
> I would never trust any list for hardware that should be fine with
> Linux, ensures there
On 30 Jul 2009, at 10:34, Damon Chaplin wrote:
>
> CMT
> 1226 "Phase Modulated Voice" all input controls FLOAT MAX: Watchdog
> timeout
> 1849 "Logistic Map Control Generator" all input controls FLOAT MIN:
> Watchdog timeout
> 1221 "Analogue Voice" all input controls FLOAT MAX: Watchdog timeout
>
>
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:55 +0200, xmag wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote all the Glame* filters, did you send me an email, and if, where
> did you send it :-)
I sent Steve Harris an email about some issues in the swh plugins, but
no problems were spotted in the Glame* filters by my test app.
> What is
On 30/7/2009, "Damon Chaplin" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all
>the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed.
>
>I've tried the demolition test app as well. The output isn't too clear
>so I've summarised the major issues spotted:
>
Are th
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:49:42 +0200
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> Damon Chaplin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed
> > all the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed.
> Great work! We need good plugins! :)
>
>
> Regards.
>
> \r
Definite
Damon Chaplin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all
> the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed.
Great work! We need good plugins! :)
Regards.
\r
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev
Hi,
I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all
the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed.
I've tried the demolition test app as well. The output isn't too clear
so I've summarised the major issues spotted:
Demolition Findings
CALF
34049 "Calf MultiChorus LAD
> The question here is: Which ones are the broken ones and which ones the
> good ones?
> I wouldn't know where to look for that info, do you?
I would never trust any list for hardware that should be fine with
Linux, ensures there will be some revision that isn't fine. I guess you
need to
http:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:14:14 +0200
Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:50:01 hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> > So if you need a power source anyway there's not much reason to use
> > FW besides maybe being a little bit more flexible than with
> > expresscard.
>
> Ever tried to connect s
Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:50:01 hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
>> So if you need a power source anyway there's not much reason to use FW
>> besides maybe being a little bit more flexible than with expresscard.
> Ever tried to connect several expresscard sounddevices at once?
The
On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:50:01 hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
> So if you need a power source anyway there's not much reason to use FW
> besides maybe being a little bit more flexible than with expresscard.
Ever tried to connect several expresscard sounddevices at once?
With firewire it is _really_ e
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:01:23 +0800
Ray Rashif wrote:
> Damned right..gotta watch out for that ricoh fw chip.
I got the suggestion to forget about firewire and look at expresscard
solutions instead. This shouldn't have the same problem as it's just
PCIe, or so I've heard.
Firewire wouldn't have m
19 matches
Mail list logo
