On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:22 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
PAE is required for NX support, and furthermore enables larger
swapspace support for non-overcommit purposes. It has the cost of more
pagetable lookup overhead, and also consumes more pagetable space per
process.
That suggests to
On 08/10/2009 05:14 PM, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:22 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
PAE is required for NX support, and furthermore enables larger
swapspace support for non-overcommit purposes. It has the cost of more
pagetable lookup overhead, and also consumes more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
gui-libraries are.
Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
But I do not want to switch in a year or two...
Thanks for your advices!
Christian
-BEGIN PGP
On Sunday 09 August 2009 23:47:17 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:59:29PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
If aeolus is small that is good. Because that leaves more memory to cache
the samples (outside of aeolus itself).
The 120 MB includes all precomputed wavetables, and they
On 08/10/2009 05:44 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Sunday 09 August 2009 23:47:17 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:59:29PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
If aeolus is small that is good. Because that leaves more memory to cache
the samples (outside of aeolus itself).
David Robillard wrote:
Building this logic on top of a set of optional
extensions would seem to be a nightmare, and that is and always
has been my main objection to this approach.
FUD, nothing more. It would be no more of a nightmare than implementing
it on top of... well, anything else;
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 18:01 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Oooh snap!
:-D
- Closed source binaries such as those provided by companies like
Adobe, Skype and Real Networks should provide flexibility for changing
the audio library path and not be hardcoded to /usr/lib/
- For 32 Bit systems
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
from a design standpoint, i totally agree with all your points, and what
little i've so far grokked of lv2 looks very nice indeed. *but*: it's a
moving target, and few host authors have committed themselves to
implement those
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:38 +0200, Christian wrote:
I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
gui-libraries are.
Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
But I do not want to switch in a year or two...
Well, I can't say anything about developing with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Wilms schrieb:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:38 +0200, Christian wrote:
I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
gui-libraries are.
Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
But I do not want to switch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Davis schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Christiankrampenschies...@freenet.de wrote:
GTKmm guis are always using your desktop theme which might be bad, too.
not true. ardour uses gtkmm and doesn't use the desktop theme.
Thats
On 10 Aug 2009, at 10:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
from a design standpoint, i totally agree with all your points, and
what
little i've so far grokked of lv2 looks very nice indeed. *but*:
it's a
moving target, and few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
gui-libraries are.
Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
But I do not want to switch in a year or two...
Well, I can't say anything about developing with either
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:51 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
All examples of FLTK I know of look horribly out of place on a modern
desktop. Like, the 80ies want their GUIs back!
Supercollider was some time ago. Current Version of FLTK has more than
one engine, including one that clains to be a
On 8/10/09, Patrick Shirkey pshir...@boosthardware.com wrote:
On 08/10/2009 05:14 PM, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:22 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
PAE is required for NX support, and furthermore enables larger
swapspace support for non-overcommit purposes. It has the
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Steve Harrisst...@plugin.org.uk wrote:
An update.
I've been contacted by the company that sells this software, asking
for retrospective permission, or something along those lines.
I'm not going to grant it - I don't really think I can, the SWH
plugins
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:41 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
crooked analogy alert... as it is now, lv2 resembles XML: you can do
anything in principle, but there is almost no common semantics. we
should move it to XHTML:
still consider
rtirq itself being listed on `rtirq status` a minor bug ;)
hopefully fixed in:
http://www.rncbc.org/jack/rtirq-20090810.tar.gz
enjoy
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rncbc.org
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
On 10 Aug 2009, at 10:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
The evolutive process described and advocated by Dave is
certainly one that can work - it is the way e.g. natural
languages get defined and change over time. It's also why
they tend to
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:06 +0200, Christian wrote:
Thorsten Wilms schrieb:
All examples of FLTK I know of look horribly out of place on a modern
desktop. Like, the 80ies want their GUIs back!
Well you can design an fltk gui pretty well.
GTKmm guis are always using your desktop theme
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:10 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Ick! Using the desktop theme is not bad! The user chose it for a
reason!
The default GTK+ Theme in the incarnation of Mandriva I have here is
absolutely stunning and good looking ... But redraws at a crawl when the
machine is close
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 18:31 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:10 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Ick! Using the desktop theme is not bad! The user chose it for a
reason!
The default GTK+ Theme in the incarnation of Mandriva I have here is
absolutely stunning and
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:57 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Now tell me again, what was the reason for choosing this theme rather
than that theme?
... in other words, being able to choose your theme is nice?
Yes, but why is UNIX always by default configured in the least useful
way?
On 08/11/2009 04:05 AM, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:57 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Now tell me again, what was the reason for choosing this theme rather
than that theme?
... in other words, being able to choose your theme is nice?
Yes, but why is
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 04:14 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
As a comparison on my 64 bit version of Gnome I find the default theme
to be very responsive...
As a comparison, the machine I have today is the equivalent of a Cray2 -
the most outrageous 200KW 'supercomputer' of the time when (the
On 08/11/2009 04:42 AM, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 04:14 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
As a comparison on my 64 bit version of Gnome I find the default theme
to be very responsive...
As a comparison, the machine I have today is the equivalent of a Cray2 -
the
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:05 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:57 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Now tell me again, what was the reason for choosing this theme rather
than that theme?
... in other words, being able to choose your theme is nice?
Yes, but why
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:42 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Spending that much clockcycles on screen redraws of bland widgets just
ain't sane anymore. Ohh, and I forgot: I even have a graphics card on
top with computational power exceeding that of the Cray2 by a factor of
four ... Still feels
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:59 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Let me guess Nvidia? Proprietary drivers?
This is such BS .. Let me Guess Intel? Opensource and broken GL!!!
-dr
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 21:14 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:59 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Let me guess Nvidia? Proprietary drivers?
This is such BS .. Let me Guess Intel? Opensource and broken GL!!!
Funny, my desktop is nice and snappy, and well
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:22 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
This is such BS .. Let me Guess Intel? Opensource and broken GL!!!
Funny, my desktop is nice and snappy, and well supported by all recent
advancements in X.
Reality seems to have a BS bias.
Ah, your 2D driver works .. But
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 21:26 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:22 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
This is such BS .. Let me Guess Intel? Opensource and broken GL!!!
Funny, my desktop is nice and snappy, and well supported by all recent
advancements in X.
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 22:04 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:41 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Actually, it is what you were complaining about (and blaming UNIX for,
unfairly for obvious reasons). You only brought up GL because I
mentioned your drivers and you got
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 22:04 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
OK, I have been around BIOS now, and changed the monitor connection as
well (so I can see what I write ... )
I have no GL whatsoever now, but - lo and behold - Clearlooks is
actually snappy? I wouldn't have believed that without
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:09 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 22:04 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
I wonder if this positive effect is also reflected in the behaviour of
scrolling in Firefox at certain (most!) 'wordpress' sites, while
simultaniously doing audio processing on
Hi there,
I'm trying to read midi events in a lv2 gui, but port_event() doesn't
get called when new midi events appear.
So, how do I get my midi events in the gui?
Regards and thanks in advance
Uli
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:14 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
What do you use to do this? (audio processing on the GPU)
Hardware is the most humble later 8400GS (revision g98 [1.4 GHz × 8
madd])
Software is the free 'C for CUDA' compiler and SDK from Nvidia
P.S. commercial != proprietary
David Robillard -
Anyway, ...replication in basic form is pretty straightforward: the host
needs a way to pass a 'replication factor' to the plugin. This raises
a
few obvious questions:
- Should changing this at run-time be possible? This is more useful
with polyphony than with
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:42 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
On 08/10/2009 11:29 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:15 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to read midi events in a lv2 gui, but port_event() doesn't
get called when new midi
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 09:57 +1200, Jeff McClintock wrote:
David Robillard -
Anyway, ...replication in basic form is pretty straightforward: the host
needs a way to pass a 'replication factor' to the plugin. This raises
a
few obvious questions:
- Should changing this at run-time
On 08/11/2009 12:03 AM, David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:42 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
On 08/10/2009 11:29 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:15 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to read midi events in a
Robin Gareus wrote:
Hello rt-users and -devs,
I have a question about per-device-IRQ-threads in 2.6.31-rc5-rt1.1:
After a suspend/resume cycle some IRQ-threads come up with a new PID.
The scheduling policy of those threads is reset to default values
instead of retaining the previously set
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:40 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Software is the free 'C for CUDA' compiler and SDK from Nvidia
Latency low enough to make realtime use feasible?
What I do is - imagining that I am a Jack client with near zero
processing time - what I do is that I 'receive
The following is all opinion which I think is what was requested:
Here's an updated list of the possible official recommendations for
discussion:
We should not really be recommending anything and 'official' makes it sound
rather orchestrated. We should be selling the benefits of the
On 08/11/2009 08:59 AM, Nick Copeland wrote:
The following is all opinion which I think is what was requested:
Here's an updated list of the possible official recommendations for
discussion:
We should not really be recommending anything and 'official' makes it
sound rather orchestrated.
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 00:12 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
On 08/11/2009 12:03 AM, David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:42 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz Schlüter wrote:
On 08/10/2009 11:29 PM, David Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:15 +0200, Ulrich Lorenz
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 00:43 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:40 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
Software is the free 'C for CUDA' compiler and SDK from Nvidia
Latency low enough to make realtime use feasible?
What I do is - imagining that I am a Jack client with
47 matches
Mail list logo
