Re: [LAD] Noob Q: Pthreads the way to go?

2009-11-12 Thread Markus Schwarzenberg
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:15:27 + Harry Van Haaren wrote: > I've googled for "c++ cross-platform threading" which returned this > post. this probably better should have returned: http://www.boost.org/doc/html/thread.html besides this,

[LAD] Noob Q: Pthreads the way to go?

2009-11-12 Thread Harry Van Haaren
Hey guys, I've been doing some reading around the internet about Object Orierientated Program designing, got a OOP design book, yet still I'm confused on how to approach des

Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler 1.0.0 released for Linux, Windows, OS X

2009-11-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:59 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi all... has anyone else seen problems with 1.0.0 and pitch bend? It > > would seem that it is broken in my builds (ie: no pitch bend response at > > all from linuxsampl

Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler 1.0.0 released for Linux, Windows, OS X

2009-11-12 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Hi all... has anyone else seen problems with 1.0.0 and pitch bend? It > would seem that it is broken in my builds (ie: no pitch bend response at > all from linuxsampler - 0.5.1 works fine in that respect). https://bugs.linuxsampler.org/cgi-bi

Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler 1.0.0 released for Linux, Windows, OS X

2009-11-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 14:45 +0200, Benno Senoner wrote: > Hi all, > the LinuxSampler team is proud to announce LinuxSampler 1.0.0, with > many new features and modules, device drivers and plugin architectures > supported. Hi all... has anyone else seen problems with 1.0.0 and pitch bend? It woul

Re: [LAD] How to develop guis for LV2?

2009-11-12 Thread David Robillard
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 22:39 -0800, David Aguilar wrote: > On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:42 AM, David Robillard wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 00:18 -0500, Simon Burton wrote: > >> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:32:47 -0500 > >> David Robillard wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> We need a good message/RPC system, basic

Re: [LAD] Timers, hpet, hrtimer -> kind of solved (for too old motherboards)

2009-11-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Clemens Ladisch wrote: > >> "Busy" means that it's there, but already being used. Many motherboard >> BIOSes do not initialize the third HPET interrupt, and the first two are >> taken by the kernel. >> > > I would like to make a test song using HR timer, but unfortuna

Re: [LAD] Timers, hpet, hrtimer -> kind of solved (for too old motherboards)

2009-11-12 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Clemens Ladisch wrote: > "Busy" means that it's there, but already being used. Many motherboard > BIOSes do not initialize the third HPET interrupt, and the first two are > taken by the kernel. I would like to make a test song using HR timer, but unfortunately I'm not able to close a project and