Hi Alex,
2010/1/27 alex stone :
>
> Tim, i wonder, given you might need to rummage around in the code a
> bit, if this the time to consider implementing jackmidi in trunk, and
> do this once, instead of twice.
> I'm no coder, but maybe there's an opportunity in this to take another
> big step forw
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> 2010/1/27 alex stone :
>>
>> Tim, i wonder, given you might need to rummage around in the code a
>> bit, if this the time to consider implementing jackmidi in trunk, and
>> do this once, instead of twice.
>> I'm no coder, but ma
To all concerned, I've gotten quite a few responses and rather respond
individually to each every one I'm responding to David Olufson's because his
is overall the most sensible and informative. I'll respond to some of his
indivdual points and then finish with this in general at the end.
On Thu, Ja
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:24 PM, David McClanahan
wrote:
> "KewlSynthOS" ?? No shit. What do you call all these audio distributions
> floating around that basically claim "Plug us in and you'll have an instant
> studio", "Look at our low latency" Blah Blah Blah. How many years has Linux
> been out
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, David McClanahan wrote:
> "KewlSynthOS" ?? No shit. What do you call all these audio distributions
> floating around that basically claim "Plug us in and you'll have an instant
> studio", "Look at our low latency" Blah Blah Blah. How many years has Linux
"Instant studio" is
