On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> I don't expect Pianoteq to be anything else than a piano, but this
> doesn't change the point that there's no allround virtual instrument on
> Linux that's suitable for the average pop producer or live keyboardist
> playing in a Top40 band. (th
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:32:23PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >I don't need 20 pianos, I also need
> > strings, pads, hard synths, Atmo-FX and the lot.
> given that pianoteq is using physical modelling, its hard to see how
> their technology could be applied to hard synths, pads or atmo-fx.
That'
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>I don't need 20 pianos, I also need
> strings, pads, hard synths, Atmo-FX and the lot.
given that pianoteq is using physical modelling, its hard to see how
their technology could be applied to hard synths, pads or atmo-fx.
_
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:46:35AM -0800, James Warden wrote:
> > a good virtual instrument. It's the confession that HQ virtual
> > instruments on Linux (besides LS) won't happen any soon.
> are you kidding ?? have you tried Pianoteq ?
I tried it some years ago, and it was crap. I tried it five
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 18:50 +0100, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> We have dedicated hardware for graphics, why not for audio ?
>
Zap the Gnome on steroids and dedicate your GPU for audio then!
I have success with 3 audio buffers × 0.3 ms + another 0.3 ms for the
PCIe roundtrip to the GPU. Voicecount i
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:46 PM, James Warden wrote:
> are you kidding ?? have you tried Pianoteq ?
> I use it at 1ms lat for RT playing together with Addictive Drums via
> dssi-vst. Not a single glitch.
>
> I use a dedicated PC, with a Core 2 Duo @ 2.4 GHz, 4GB RAM and RNME HDSP +
> Multiface I
On 4/2/2010, "Emanuel Rumpf" wrote:
>I don't think my system is so badly configured - how to measure ?
>It's not the most recent hardware, I admit.
Run this script as your user (ie not as root)
http://realtimeconfigquickscan.googlecode.com/hg/realTimeConfigQuickScan.pl
>> Have fun,
>
>Than
--- On Thu, 2/4/10, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> From: Adrian Knoth
> Subject: Re: [LAD] Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ... [related
> to:] hard realtime performance synth
> To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010, 1:46 PM
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06
2010/2/4 Arnold Krille :
> On Thursday 04 February 2010 18:50:28 Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
>> Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ( live )...
>> ...and I don't mean a one-finger melody, but a mutli-polyphonic piano
>> piece, eventually with sustain held down, which resulted in about 20 to 40
>>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:04:17AM +0100, Igor Brkic wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> . . .
>
> So plenty of room for improvements. ;)
>
Thanks for comments and suggestions. I agree with you about things you
mentioned. Till now I mostly used it for fun and
On 02/04/2010 05:12 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Like all stand-alone jack tools, it's usability hell.
>
> VocProc also connects to physical ins/out at startup.
>
> Next: VocProc changes the volume.
>
> So plenty of room for improvements. ;)
easy, man. it's the first public release, and it sez oh-do
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:50:28PM +0100, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ( live )...
>
> ...and I don't mean a one-finger melody, but a mutli-polyphonic piano
> piece, eventually with sustain held down, which resulted in about 20
> to 40 simultaneusly processed
On Thursday 04 February 2010 18:50:28 Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ( live )...
> ...and I don't mean a one-finger melody, but a mutli-polyphonic piano
> piece, eventually with sustain held down, which resulted in about 20 to 40
> simultaneusly processed voice
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
> Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ( live )...
>
> ...and I don't mean a one-finger melody, but a mutli-polyphonic piano piece,
> eventually with sustain held down, which resulted in about 20 to 40
> simultaneusly processed voices.
>
Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ( live )...
...and I don't mean a one-finger melody, but a mutli-polyphonic piano piece,
eventually with sustain held down, which resulted in about 20 to 40
simultaneusly processed voices.
I just realized, that I've never been able to do that. Neither
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:04:17AM +0100, Igor Brkic wrote:
Hi!
> It is basically the same thing as fons' jretune or Tom's autotalent. I
Thanks for mentioning jretune. I haven't noticed this, but just asked
Fons for a copy.
Autotalent is completely unusable, the artefacts are just too obvious.
16 matches
Mail list logo
