Christopher Cherrett wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [LAD] Canonical sound position opening
> From: Jörn Nettingsmeier
> To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> Date: 02/11/10 15:51
>
>> On 02/11/2010 05:28 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> but I'm just a
Original Message
Subject: Re: [LAD] Canonical sound position opening
From: Jörn Nettingsmeier
To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 02/11/10 15:51
> On 02/11/2010 05:28 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> but I'm just a stupid user spreading FUD, so simply
>> ignore my expe
On 02/11/2010 05:28 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> but I'm just a stupid user spreading FUD, so simply
> ignore my experiences.
jeez, just shut up.
say, do you also feel an urge to reply to obituaries and commercial ads
in your paper with letters to the editor?
it's just plain stupid to discuss your
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:22:03 +
Adam Sampson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:07:54PM +0100, Renato wrote:
> > jack-rack
>
> Sorry, that one's my fault -- I've been absurdly busy with work and my
> thesis for the last few months, and haven't had time to look at the
> outstanding problems a
On 11/2/2010, "Dave Phillips" wrote:
>james morris wrote:
>> Just one or two questions as there's no response to this from the three
>> lists I've sent it to. I'm just being impatient, but not critical of
>> the lack of response, and seeking some feedback about similar existing
>> systems if any
Forwind info wrote:
> Ralf, simply turn off autospawn for pulse if it bothers you that much.
>
> /etc/pulse/client.conf
>
> the line that looks like
> ; autospawn=yes
>
> change it to
> autospawn = no
>
> This will turn off pulseaudio so as the next time you start up, pulse
> will not run and you
Ralf, simply turn off autospawn for pulse if it bothers you that much.
/etc/pulse/client.conf
the line that looks like
; autospawn=yes
change it to
autospawn = no
This will turn off pulseaudio so as the next time you start up, pulse will
not run and you will need to start it manually from comm
Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:03:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>
>
>>> Strong interests and experience with Pulseaudio, Alsa, and
>>> other sound related technology and
>>>
>
>
>> Why not removing Pulseaudio like 64 Studio does?
>>
>
> Ralf, this is clearl
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:03:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Strong interests and experience with Pulseaudio, Alsa, and
> > other sound related technology and
> Why not removing Pulseaudio like 64 Studio does?
Ralf, this is clearly not the place to discuss this. Canonical is
searching fo
james morris wrote:
> Just one or two questions as there's no response to this from the three
> lists I've sent it to. I'm just being impatient, but not critical of
> the lack of response, and seeking some feedback about similar existing
> systems if any (which is something I'd not put as much cons
Forwind info wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new position has come up at Canonical (ubuntu) for a sound software
> engineer.
> Details are below. You can apply online from here
> http://webapps.ubuntu.com/employment/canonical_UDSE/
>
>
>
> Job Title: Ubuntu Desktop Sound Engineer
> Posting Date & id: Fe
On 11/2/2010, "james morris" wrote:
>
>I think this has some potential if it were realized as an application
>with it's own window space and dedicated widgets rather than as a bash
>script utilizing xterms and window-manager window-placement. It maps the
>positions of the popup xterms to note-pi
Hi all,
A new position has come up at Canonical (ubuntu) for a sound software
engineer.
Details are below. You can apply online from here
http://webapps.ubuntu.com/employment/canonical_UDSE/
Job Title: Ubuntu Desktop Sound Engineer
Posting Date & id: February 2010 UDSE
Job Location: Your home,
Adam Sampson writes:
> The two obvious big bits of work that could be done to it are to add
> JACK MIDI support (which should be fairly easy), and to add support for
> LV2 plugins (a bit trickier). For the latter, I was wondering if it
> might be easier to retrofit JACK Rack's nice interface to o
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:07:54PM +0100, Renato wrote:
> jack-rack
Sorry, that one's my fault -- I've been absurdly busy with work and my
thesis for the last few months, and haven't had time to look at the
outstanding problems and put together a new release. If Bob or Gordon
would like to take it
I've cc'd the rezound author..
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:49:49PM -0500, Tim E. Real wrote:
> On February 10, 2010 05:11:27 pm humbert.olivie...@free.fr wrote:
> > ...happy to hear something who make me thing that reZound can will be
> > reworked/update :D
> >
> > Olivier,
> > http://www.linuxmao
On Wednesday 10 February 2010, at 22.45.40, Emanuel Rumpf
wrote:
> 2010/2/8 Paul Davis :
> > not all PCs can do it. but its simply not true that "PCs can't do it".
>
> Accepted.
>
>
> When running any 32 polyphonic hw synth,
> it is able to do those 32 voices anytime.
> When running out of the
I think this has some potential if it were realized as an application
with it's own window space and dedicated widgets rather than as a bash
script utilizing xterms and window-manager window-placement. It maps the
positions of the popup xterms to note-pitch and note-velocity.
I don't know though,
18 matches
Mail list logo
