Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Tim E. Real
On February 22, 2010 03:59:25 pm Arnold Krille wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010 21:24:58 Tim E. Real wrote: > > On February 22, 2010 02:56:50 pm Paul wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > > > > Good day... > > > > > > > > Just coming to grips working with and learn

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:06:55PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > >> >> But why is your app giving midi-ports both for jack and >> >> alsa at the same time? >> > >> > Why not?  I think that doing this actually serves users >> > better, especially since JACK M

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:16 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? > > > > > > kernel 2.

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? > > > > kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland > > RME card (pcmcia card + multiface)

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? > > > > kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland > > RME card (pcmcia card + multiface)

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? > > kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland > RME card (pcmcia card + multiface) > > hdspmixer is not doing the right thing (does not initialize the card

Re: [LAD] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 00:25 +0100, Florian Faber wrote: > James, > > > could it be the PCMCIA part ? I have the PCI version and both 2.6.31.x and > > 2.6.32 are working as they should with my RME HDSP and Multiface II. > > It's pretty much a regression in the ALSA control part. Unfortunately I >

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread fons
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:06:55PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > >> But why is your app giving midi-ports both for jack and > >> alsa at the same time? > > > > Why not?  I think that doing this actually serves users > > better, especially since JACK MIDI adoption is still on the > > up-swing. > > 1)

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Arnold Krille wrote: > >> But why is your app giving midi-ports both for jack and >> alsa at the same time? > > Why not?  I think that doing this actually serves users > better, especially since JACK MIDI ad

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Arnold Krille wrote: > But why is your app giving midi-ports both for jack and > alsa at the same time? Why not? I think that doing this actually serves users better, especially since JACK MIDI adoption is still on the up-swing. -gabriel ___

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Tim E. Real
On February 22, 2010 03:38:25 pm you wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > > On February 22, 2010 02:56:50 pm Paul wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > >> > Good day... > >> > > >> > Just coming to grips working with and learning the alias sys

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Arnold Krille
On Monday 22 February 2010 21:24:58 Tim E. Real wrote: > On February 22, 2010 02:56:50 pm Paul wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > > > Good day... > > > > > > Just coming to grips working with and learning the alias system... > > > > > > Under what conditions might a J

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > On February 22, 2010 02:56:50 pm Paul wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: >> > Good day... >> > >> > Just coming to grips working with and learning the alias system... >> > >> > Under what conditions might a Jack port

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Tim E. Real
On February 22, 2010 02:56:50 pm Paul wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > > Good day... > > > > Just coming to grips working with and learning the alias system... > > > > Under what conditions might a Jack port not have any alias names? > > When might I expect to encount

Re: [LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > Good day... > > Just coming to grips working with and learning the alias system... > > Under what conditions might a Jack port not have any alias names? > When might I expect to encounter that situation? You should never assume the existence o

[LAD] Jack port alias names

2010-02-22 Thread Tim E. Real
Good day... Just coming to grips working with and learning the alias system... Under what conditions might a Jack port not have any alias names? When might I expect to encounter that situation? Because our app supports both ALSA midi and Jack midi, the app's very own ALSA ports are showing up

[LAD] [off-list] midi beat clock

2010-02-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Tim E. Real wrote: > wrote: > >> With my CPU [1] resampling seems to be still a problem. I'm using >> Qtractor, but didn't use it's time stretch feature for audio clips, >> instead I used Rubber Band as plugin to pitch down drums. This forced >> the CPU to it's knees. Another issue might be tro

Re: [LAD] midi beat clock

2010-02-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Tim E. Real wrote: > On February 19, 2010 10:17:12 pm Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > >> As PD said, the MIDI spec requires That MIDI Clock (0xF8) >> pulses be sent out at a rate of 24 clocks per quarter note. >> Meanwhile, a MIDI Tick (0xF9) is sent out at a rate of 1 >> tick per 10 ms. The

Re: [LAD] midi beat clock

2010-02-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Paul Davis wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > > >> Imagine. Midi clock, active sense, tick and/or MTC all on the same line... >> > > the MMA specs recommend a separate MIDI cable for MTC. > And Midi clock + song position pointer is useful or MTC without M