Ok Marije, Arnold, Philipp :)
programs don't depend to the development files, so I perceive that they
should be separated.
Today for 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 = Ubuntu Hardy we do have a package jackd
including /usr/bin/jackd.
A package jackdbus including nothing but copyright, TODO etc..
A package li
Excerpts from Ralf Mardorf's message of 2010-04-18 11:01:41 +0200:
> Ok Marije, Arnold, Philipp :)
>
> programs don't depend to the development files, so I perceive that they
> should be separated.
> Today for 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 = Ubuntu Hardy we do have a package jackd
> including /usr/bin/jac
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 12:10 +0200, Stéphane LETZ wrote:
> At Grame, we started working on JACK (jack1 at that time) in 2003 and our
> first commitment was to port the C code base on OSX. Even if the result was
> working, we rapidly felt that the C code base was not flexible enough to
> evolve in
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
> I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
> What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broken until last year, but I fixed
everything and worked closely together with upst
Philipp wrote:
> Excerpts from Ralf Mardorf's message of 2010-04-18 11:01:41 +0200:
>
>> Ok Marije, Arnold, Philipp :)
>>
>> programs don't depend to the development files, so I perceive that they
>> should be separated.
>> Today for 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 = Ubuntu Hardy we do have a package jackd
Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
>
>
>> I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
>> What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
>>
>
> Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broken until last year, but I fixed
> every
Excerpts from Adrian Knoth's message of 2010-04-18 11:25:57 +0200:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:09:53AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
>
> > I don't really know, nor care, about debian specific packaging stuff.
> > What I know is that it has a record of being broken.
>
> Stop that FUD. Ok, a lot was broke
Philipp wrote:
> What was the topic again?
:D
I've sent what I guess the topic should be 3 minutes before you sent
your mail.
Again.
IMO the topic should be the free choice between JACK1 and JACK2. It's
unimportant if there is one package or if there are 5 packages for each
JACK. JACK3, DBUS
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
> What was the topic again?
We're working on it.
"it" as in "different jack implementations in Debian". Historically, we
only had jackd1, but I guess we'll at least see jackd1 and jackd2,
perhaps also tschack, and the user will be able to
Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Philipp wrote:
>
>
>> What was the topic again?
>>
>
> We're working on it.
>
> "it" as in "different jack implementations in Debian". Historically, we
> only had jackd1, but I guess we'll at least see jackd1 and jackd2,
> perh
hermann wrote: [snip ... because it's off-list, but I guess the thread
shouldn't be closed, pardon]
There are several reasons why people like to switch between versions of
JACK and it isn't that easy to do. Not every musician has knowledge
about technique. Comparison to other OS are irrelevant.
Ups, it go's offline wrong button. :-)
I don't understand all this trouble, we have the choice, no mater witch
distro we use and no mater witch version the distro use as default, we
could switch to the jack version we wont. That's what brings us in this
situation. Sometimes it need more or less w
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:16 AM, rosea.grammostola
wrote:
> It's pretty odd that you guys didn't discuss this clearly with each
> other. It seems that people have an opinion about something, but only
> share this with people who have the same opinion and not with the one
> who himself or his code
This domain has expired
It will be deleted in the next few days. If you are the owner of this
domain, you still have a chance to renew it.
Domain Name
Expires
alsa-project.org
16-APR-10
To renew this domain or to request further information please contact us
at dom...@forpsi.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 03:34:48PM +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> This domain has expired
> It will be deleted in the next few days. If you are the owner of this
> domain, you still have a chance to renew it.
oops :)
The unofficial page, http://alsa.opensrc.org , is still up.
The whois infor
On Sunday 18 April 2010 00:14:31 Philipp wrote:
> Excerpts from Arnold Krille's message of 2010-04-17 23:15:11 +0200:
> >...
> > That way your favourite
> > music player can have an output plugin that looks for jack and if that is
> > not running, looks for pulse and finally choose direct alsa for
On 19 April 2010 01:42, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Hm, which distribution apart from gentoo do you know that has jacks libs and
> server/apps in one package?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/jack/files/
We do not believe in the extra work of splitting package files for no
added benefit.
Excerpts from Arnold Krille's message of 2010-04-18 19:42:00 +0200:
> On Sunday 18 April 2010 00:14:31 Philipp wrote:
> > Excerpts from Arnold Krille's message of 2010-04-17 23:15:11 +0200:
> > >...
> > > That way your favourite
> > > music player can have an output plugin that looks for jack and i
Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 19 April 2010 01:42, Arnold Krille wrote:
>
>> Hm, which distribution apart from gentoo do you know that has jacks libs and
>> server/apps in one package?
>>
>
> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/jack/files/
>
> We do not believe in the extra work of split
On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 08:31 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:16 AM, rosea.grammostola
> wrote:
> > It's pretty odd that you guys didn't discuss this clearly with each
> > other. It seems that people have an opinion about something, but only
> > share this with people who have t
On 19 April 2010 02:57, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> An seemingly outdated information said "pacman -S jack" will make JACK2
> available too. A quick web search doesn't say if there are JACK1 and 2
> available for Arch. Is this the distro that already makes the choice
> available?
jack is and will for t
Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 19 April 2010 02:57, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> An seemingly outdated information said "pacman -S jack" will make JACK2
>> available too. A quick web search doesn't say if there are JACK1 and 2
>> available for Arch. Is this the distro that already makes the choice
>> avail
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:21:06PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 08:31 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:16 AM, rosea.grammostola
> > wrote:
> > > It's pretty odd that you guys didn't discuss this clearly with each
> > > other. It seems that people ha
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, rosea.grammostola
wrote:
> This could all be true, but that's not the point I was talking about.
> JACK2 was planned as successor of JACK1. But at some point that changed,
No, Jack2 (then jackdmp) was not planned as a successor of Jack1. It
was initially planned a
>>
>> This could all be true, but that's not the point I was talking about.
>> JACK2 was planned as successor of JACK1. But at some point that changed,
>> that's all ok, not the point here. But isn't it odd that this isn't
>> clearly communicated with the JACK2 maintainer, why this is happened?
>>
Le 19 avr. 2010 à 00:34, Paul Davis a écrit :
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, rosea.grammostola
> wrote:
>> This could all be true, but that's not the point I was talking about.
>> JACK2 was planned as successor of JACK1. But at some point that changed,
>
> No, Jack2 (then jackdmp) was not p
26 matches
Mail list logo
