Here's the new results with "-w 20" (nb: "-w" == "-w 0")
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Niels Mayer wrote:
> A) Edirol UM-2 ( http://qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdev.php?id=1244 )
> (NB: tested using an illegally-long 30-foot USB cable -- that works
> fine with the UM-2 slow USB device).
> Device: 36
On Friday 02 July 2010, Paul Davis wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Adrian Knoth
wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:43:38PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
[...]
>> You're both missing an argument after -w. I wonder (but haven't
>> checked the source) why the tool even starts when you don't pr
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:43:38PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> > [[see also latency test results for USB 1.0 devices Emagic MT-4 and
>> > Edirol UM-2, below reply]]
>>
>> just for comparison, here are the results for an RME Digiface:
>> sudo
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 07:43:38PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > [[see also latency test results for USB 1.0 devices Emagic MT-4 and
> > Edirol UM-2, below reply]]
>
> just for comparison, here are the results for an RME Digiface:
> sudo /usr/bin/alsa-midi-latency-test -w -r -R -i 20:0 -o 20:0
Yo
