On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:56 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Thursday 15 July 2010 01:14:45 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:46 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > > Apart from that, it remains to be seen if *real* timing errors of
> > > +/- 2 ms do 'destroy the groove'. To test
Shit, I tried to do some research, but
lad.linuxaudio.org and linuxav.org/mailarchive seem to be down :( and it
seems that my last mail didn't come through the list :(.
Has anybody else this trouble?
If not please send me an email.
Shit!
Ralf
___
Li
Test message for lad.linuxaudio.org. Someone wrote, it could be down.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:32 +0400, Mike Cookson wrote:
> Test message for lad.linuxaudio.org. Someone wrote, it could be down.
It's ok now, not only for the list, but also the websites are ok :).
--
Is it possible to get an audible difference between white noise and
transposed white noise?
Some
On Friday 16 July 2010 09:50:39 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:56 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > You really should do that test first before speculating about the outcome
> > and your audience.
> Btw. I tested my own music.
> First I played inside songs from other people a Ralf-mas
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:46 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Friday 16 July 2010 09:50:39 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:56 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > > You really should do that test first before speculating about the outcome
> > > and your audience.
> > Btw. I tested my own
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
> But nothing was ever done about the slider markings.
> Having them go from 0 to 164 is not really helpful.
> It's not clear where the 0dB mark is.
> At the very least a 0dB mark should be added.
> Uh, do you feel like taking a stab at this?
> I
On Friday 16 July 2010 12:06:02 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:46 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > On Friday 16 July 2010 09:50:39 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:56 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > > > You really should do that test first before speculating about t
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:19 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> (Thats why scientists always want more money for devices:)
That's the reason for my signature.
Ignore the ironical question, but the sentence about he metal palates in
the vacuum is a serious ironical statement.
No doubt about your argume
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 12:46 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I tested did it, but I'm sure
Oops, there's a sentence accidentally killed ... sorry, but I'm in a
hurry.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxa
On Friday 16 July 2010 06:06:02 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> It's impossible to do neutral measurements and from a democratically
> worldview listening to recordings without dynamic is the winner.
My personal take is that I would prefer different mixes for different uses.
When out walking on dangerous s
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 07:02 -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
> On Friday 16 July 2010 06:06:02 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > It's impossible to do neutral measurements and from a democratically
> > worldview listening to recordings without dynamic is the winner.
>
> My personal take is that I would prefer dif
On 07/16/2010 11:46 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Friday 16 July 2010 09:50:39 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:56 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
>>> You really should do that test first before speculating about the outcome
>>> and your audience.
>> Btw. I tested my own music.
>> First
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 13:26 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 07/16/2010 11:46 AM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > On Friday 16 July 2010 09:50:39 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 09:56 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> >>> You really should do that test first before speculating about the outcome
Am Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:27:35 -0500
schrieb Nathanael Anderson :
> Here is the setup i'm looking to do:
>
> midi master -> special program
> ddr pad -> special program
> special program -> hydrogen
>
> I've got a hardware midi device controlling the master tempo. aseqdump shows
> the tempo messag
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Geoff King wrote:
> Niels, Thank you for taking the time to work on improving Envy24Ctl.
> I tried your patch for the peaks and it seemed to work fine for me. I
> can't comment on the code (as I'm much more musician than programmer),
> but had no problem patching
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 03:57:20PM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
> On a completely different "note" the envy 24 manual (
> http://alsa.cybermirror.org/manuals/icensemble/envy24.pdf )
> has interesting info on the envy24 digital mixer that I've snapshotted:
>
> Diagram: http://nielsmayer.com/npm/envy
Been so long since I studied envy24 stuff that I was in danger of
messing up facts and wishing for something that might not be
possible. So I pulled my card out and looked at the ICs and their
datsheets, and looked at envy24control coding.
The ADC chip on my particular card is AK4524 from AK
On July 16, 2010 08:56:30 pm Tim E. Real wrote:
> Been so long since I studied envy24 stuff that I was in danger of
> messing up facts and wishing for something that might not be
> possible. So I pulled my card out and looked at the ICs and their
> datsheets, and looked at envy24control coding.
On July 16, 2010 05:34:11 pm m.wolkst...@gmx.de wrote:
> Am Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:27:35 -0500
>
> schrieb Nathanael Anderson :
> > Here is the setup i'm looking to do:
> >
> > midi master -> special program
> > ddr pad -> special program
> > special program -> hydrogen
> >
> > I've got a hardware mid
OK final message for now...
On July 16, 2010 08:56:30 pm Tim E. Real wrote:
> Here we go! snd_mixer_selem_get_playback_dB( )
>
> Problem solved? Accurate or not?
Slider markings still not possible with this - it is only a 'current' value.
But that's OK, I'm now thinking markings on every slide
21 matches
Mail list logo
