Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] announcing envy24control, mudita (*) edition.

2010-08-04 Thread Niels Mayer
Actually, there's a much simpler version of this patch, since the previous code provided some extra validation and pretty error messages, but no information that couldn't be provided by snd_ctl_open(), e.g.: gnulem-336-~> envy24control -Dfoo ALSA lib control.c:902:(snd_ctl_open_noupdate) Inval

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] announcing envy24control, mudita (*) edition.

2010-08-04 Thread Niels Mayer
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Raymond Yau wrote: > The "-D" option seem to be used similar to  "amixer -Dabc" > ctl.abc {  type hw , card 2 } Raymond -- Thanks for the clarification regarding the use of the -D argument for alsa control devices. I've updated my code to handle things in the sam

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:45 PM, wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:31:49PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > >> when i did this with ardour (and a few other projects) back in the >> early days, when guile was the interpreter of choice, any benefits it >> brought to the table were negated by its intrusi

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread fons
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:31:49PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > when i did this with ardour (and a few other projects) back in the > early days, when guile was the interpreter of choice, any benefits it > brought to the table were negated by its intrusiveness into the > overall process structure. I

[LAD] [ANN] Nano-Basket v0.1

2010-08-04 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
Hi Nano-Basket v0.1 has been released. Source files are available from http://github.com/royvegard/Nano-Basket Nano-Basket is a configuration software for the Korg nanoSERIES MIDI controllers. It's intended to run on operating systems where the official configuration editor is not available (i.e.

Re: [LAD] announcing envy24control, mudita (*) edition.

2010-08-04 Thread Niels Mayer
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Tim E. Real wrote: > Something odd. Are you sure about those digital mixer ranges? Yep. > They now go down to only -48dB instead of -144dB. > Seems like 2/3 of the range is missing? Truncated. At least for my purposes, the original faders w/ 144dB dynamic range a

Re: [LAD] announcing envy24control, mudita (*) edition.

2010-08-04 Thread Tim E. Real
Hi Niels. Something odd. Are you sure about those digital mixer ranges? They now go down to only -48dB instead of -144dB. Seems like 2/3 of the range is missing? Verified against the original mixer, and amixer. Also, the 'active' colour of the meters seems way too 'soft'? Seems like just a slight

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread fons
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:43:52AM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > You are aware that those filters will be in antiphase in the xover > > region ? > > What would you recommend? Invert one of the two outputs... > > Measuring subs (or anything LF) is hell... unless you have some > > ver

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:32 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:11:28PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > That would be great... right now I'm using a HPF/LPF pair for my tests > > (butterworth 12dB/oct, supercollider) and placing them high enough that, > > wel

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jack O'Quin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:01 AM,   wrote: > That seems like a good approach. There's a lot to be said for using a > complete programming language for configuration. Python provides > functions, variables, control flow and classes, everything yo

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread fons
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:56:31AM -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:01 AM, wrote: > > > I'm still in doubt what to do with the configuration files. Since adding > > OSC is easy, they could just be the textual form of OSC they are now. > > The other option is to skip this and

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Jack O'Quin
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:01 AM, wrote: > I'm still in doubt what to do with the configuration files. Since adding > OSC is easy, they could just be the textual form of OSC they are now. > The other option is to skip this and turn the config files into active > Python code, directly using the API

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread fons
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:11:28PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > That would be great... right now I'm using a HPF/LPF pair for my tests > (butterworth 12dB/oct, supercollider) and placing them high enough that, > well, maybe both the loudspeakers and the subs are in a region that is > not

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread fons
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:20:56PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > On 08/04/2010 08:11 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > >Unrelated question, does ambdec do third order vertical? Will it? > >(I'm going to have zenith and nadir speakers in the Listening Room so it > >would be able to do 3rd

Re: [LAD] what does "full range" mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 08/04/2010 08:11 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Unrelated question, does ambdec do third order vertical? Will it? (I'm going to have zenith and nadir speakers in the Listening Room so it would be able to do 3rd order h and v). me too! wouldn't even need a gui to create them, but it would