Hi list,
i want to write a jack2 network backend, like netjack2, for my bachelor
thesis.
There is a new network standard comming up specialized for audio and
video transmission, called AVB (Audio Video Bridging - IEEE 802.1AS,
802.1Qat, 802.1Qav,...).
I want do integrate this standard
Hi, I've written a small program (Leevi is its name) to drive Lexicon
MX300, similar console what Lexicon ships for Windows operating system
along with their devices. Leevi supports Linux and BSD, and needs
either libusb-0 or libusb-1. It does not require any user interface
libraries, as
Le 25 févr. 2011 à 11:02, Christoph Kuhr a écrit :
Hi list,
i want to write a jack2 network backend, like netjack2, for my bachelor
thesis.
There is a new network standard comming up specialized for audio and video
transmission, called AVB (Audio Video Bridging - IEEE 802.1AS,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:42:46AM +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 00:34 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I learned that 'ingen' is Swedish for 'no, nobody, nothing' or
similar...
Nobody it is.
Tack :-)
Also noticed 'ingen fara' - no problem and 'ingen aning' - no
On 02/25/11 11:30, j...@lasipalatsi.fi wrote:
http://leevi.sourceforge.net
Two things I faced:
1. linking fails:
gcc -L/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/pkg/lib -L -lpthread -ldl
-lm -lz -lc -o bin/leevi act.o bob.o callback.o cmdline.o config.o
effects.o event.o font.o graphics.o
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 11:28 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Also noticed 'ingen fara' - no problem and 'ingen aning' - no idea.
In a compound statement, yes
And then You have the Scottish Gaelic inghean from Old Irish ingen
meaning daughter which might be related to the Swedish/Norwegian
On 02/23/2011 06:24 PM, Daniel Poelzleithner wrote:
On 02/23/2011 11:10 AM, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
The dynamic cgroups solution seems good.
On Android there basically is one priviledged and trusted audio process,
audioflinger, the sound server, which performs mixing and access the
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com wrote:
But let's take JACK for example. It handles setting up realtime scheduling
transparently when one creates a jack client. There isn't any extra step
necessary. As a supposition, could you imagine that ulatencyd
On 02/25/2011 04:53 PM, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Wouldn't this be an improvement in regard to security?
About this, security really doesn't seem like a pointless question to me.
Otherwise, why would all major distributions grant absolutely no realtime
privileges/runtime by default? Reading the
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com wrote:
Let's now consider that clients runs as user(s) which do not have realtime
privileges by default, but that it's JACK which grant them such privileges and
assign them a certain CPU time share dynamically. In this
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com wrote:
On 02/25/2011 04:53 PM, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Wouldn't this be an improvement in regard to security?
About this, security really doesn't seem like a pointless question to me.
Otherwise, why would all major
On 02/25/2011 05:33 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
the point is that both OS X and contemporary linux have mechanisms
that prevent RT scheduling from locking up the system.
linux distributions have not adapted to this reality and thus they
still continue to make RT scheduling inaccessible to users
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com wrote:
In these circumstances, maybe that a JACK specific solution could make sense.
It
would only need jackd to run as a privileged user (I don't mean root). Maybe
that this would make its way into major distributions
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 00:34 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:47:10PM -0500, David Robillard wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 21:39 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:20:44AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
[...]
This is an error that any
2011/2/23 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com:
Now, here is why rss, email et al don't do a good work enough: they
don't provide perspective and they don't expose connections between
people right away. I've served several years as social hub for free
graphics software
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:48 +, Chris Cannam wrote:
On 23 February 2011 23:55, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
They're all in my LAD meta-repository:
Ah, externals.
LGPL I see -- I've no problem with that in principle, but it would
complicate matters a bit (both Dataquay and
On 02/25/2011 07:33 PM, David Robillard wrote:
That said, I can't think of an actual reason why LGPL complicates
matters...
I am not a lawyer and all that but on mobile devices it can be very complicated
(or impossible) to satisfy the ability-to-relink LGPL requirement.
LV2 plugins on mobile
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
LV2 plugins on mobile devices? Yes, I'm investigating that :)
Olivier++
Android or...?
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
On 02/25/2011 08:14 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
LV2 plugins on mobile devices? Yes, I'm investigating that :)
Olivier++
Android or...?
Yep :)
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
On 02/25/2011 08:14 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
LV2 plugins on mobile devices? Yes, I'm investigating that :)
Olivier++
Android or...?
Yep :)
Is there something I could take a look at?
On 02/25/2011 08:15 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
On 02/25/2011 08:14 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
LV2 plugins on mobile devices? Yes, I'm investigating that :)
Olivier++
Android or...?
Yep :)
Is
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:29 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 02/25/2011 08:15 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
On 02/25/2011 08:14 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
LV2 plugins on mobile devices? Yes, I'm
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
On 02/25/2011 08:15 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
On 02/25/2011 08:14 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
LV2 plugins on mobile devices? Yes, I'm investigating
On 02/25/2011 08:57 PM, David Robillard wrote:
It's a few months ago now that I investigated LV2. IIRC, at that time I
concluded that this wasn't an option because SLV2 was GPL'ed. But things are
changing IIUC :)
You never asked. I would have changed it... but I am not psychic ;)
It's not
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
On 02/25/2011 08:57 PM, David Robillard wrote:
It's a few months ago now that I investigated LV2. IIRC, at that time I
concluded that this wasn't an option because SLV2 was GPL'ed. But things are
changing IIUC :)
You never asked. I would have
On 02/25/2011 08:59 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
The thing about Android is that third-party plugins should be rather
feasible.
There are simple mechanisms which could easily allow a host to discover which
plugins are installed on the system. Such plugins could be distributed as
standalone
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
There are a couple of security issues with linking about a third-party .so
though.
True.
However, my question about this Android/LV2 possibility is: what for? Any
ideas?
In my case, it's intended to provide effects for my app, TapeMachine:
On 02/25/2011 09:24 PM, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com:
There are a couple of security issues with linking about a third-party .so
though.
True.
However, my question about this Android/LV2 possibility is: what for? Any
ideas?
In my case, it's
Clear your cookies and try again. Google must know you are involved
in Linux Audio ;)
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:50 PM, David Robillard wrote:
It's also the company in Jurassic Park. One day I'll make
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 21:09 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 02/25/2011 08:57 PM, David Robillard wrote:
It's a few months ago now that I investigated LV2. IIRC, at that time I
concluded that this wasn't an option because SLV2 was GPL'ed. But things
are
changing IIUC :)
You
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.comwrote:
That said there is another big problem. This glib dependency, it's way too
heavy
for mobile deployment.
Perhaps one of these alternatives could work as a stand-in replacement?
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Jeremy Salwen jeremysal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Olivier Guilyardi l...@samalyse.com
wrote:
That said there is another big problem. This glib dependency, it's way too
heavy
for mobile deployment.
Perhaps one of these alternatives
On 25 Feb 2011 18:34, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net wrote:
I switched Serd and Sord to 2-clause BSD. Enjoy.
Thanks! I hope to.
The license header is
bigger and uglier and has a bunch of lawyer boiler-plate yelling in it,
which I am not aesthetically please with at all... :)
I've always
33 matches
Mail list logo
