On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 11:53 -0800, Iain Duncan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Stefano D'Angelo
zanga.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/19 David Robillard d...@drobilla.net:
[...]
Writing one UI that works on all reasonable devices for free
with zero
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, is that proposal a dead duck now?
No, its not a dead duck. But there is little to no manpower around to
do an initial implementation so that it can be evaluated beyond paper.
Seems to me like if it worked, it
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:04 AM, hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
I realize this question might be provokative, but I've never seen this
comparison before and am genuinely interested in your opinion.
Both java and browser/JS are cross platform. Both are available on almost
every device out
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wondering if I understand this correctly. I making a loop based app for
step sequencing. When I previously did this in Csound, I clocked it off a
phasor, so the timing was sample accurate ( but that brought all
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, I know you did some stuff with this with your old step sequencer. Do
SoftWerk? It didn't use JACK at all because when I wrote it
(pre-Ardour, pre-JACK) there was no JACK MIDI and no point in using
it. One day
Well, as a Java dev I felt the need to interject! :-)
iPhone is still a problem, but desktop is easy - just ship with an embedded
JVM in the same way you embed webkit.
The capabilities and performance of the Java VM are still well ahead of
JavaScript, which is not the same as saying it's the way
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Neil C Smith n...@neilcsmith.net wrote:
Well, as a Java dev I felt the need to interject! :-)
iPhone is still a problem, but desktop is easy - just ship with an embedded
JVM in the same way you embed webkit.
and therein lies the difference to:
visit
2011/11/20 Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Neil C Smith n...@neilcsmith.net wrote:
Well, as a Java dev I felt the need to interject! :-)
iPhone is still a problem, but desktop is easy - just ship with an embedded
JVM in the same way you embed webkit.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.comwrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, is that proposal a dead duck now?
No, its not a dead duck. But there is little to no manpower around to
do an initial
Can you use the same approach you did in csound, using
jack_transport's BBT info to run your phasor? It would require that
some app set a tempo and time signature, of course. I use klick, or
gtklick (which has a tap tempo feature), to do this.
That's precisely what I'm trying to figure out
i think you may be confused about what JACK transport offers. its a
global transport. that means that when you locate (which includes to
looping) to a new position, *all* clients must be ready to continue
processing audio before it can roll again after the locate. For some
kinds of clients,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, that clarifies things a lot for me. I didn't think about the disk
seeking issue. (For my app, my intent is to have everything in RAM for live
playing ). Was the intent of the jack looping transport proposal
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.comwrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks, that clarifies things a lot for me. I didn't think about the disk
seeking issue. (For my app, my intent is to have everything
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Iain Duncan iainduncanli...@gmail.com wrote:
Off the official ardourd-jack roadmap record, do you think there's a
realistic chance of this still happening in the next few years? At least for
Ardour? I might code such that I can use ardour with it when
On 20 November 2011 13:58, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Neil C Smith n...@neilcsmith.net wrote:
Well, as a Java dev I felt the need to interject! :-)
iPhone is still a problem, but desktop is easy - just ship with an embedded
JVM in the same
Hey Paul!
You said:
Many people look at Live and do not realize the sophistication of what
they are doing.
Can you briefly speak about what kind of things they are doing, just so
that I would know how difficult it is and how realistically can we (not)
expect this to ever appear on Linux - and
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Louigi Verona louigi.ver...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Paul!
You said:
Many people look at Live and do not realize the sophistication of what
they are doing.
Can you briefly speak about what kind of things they are doing, just so
that I would know how difficult
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 06:04 -0500, hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
[...]
I realize this question might be provokative, but I've never seen this
comparison before and am genuinely interested in your opinion.
Both java and browser/JS are cross platform. Both are available on almost
every device out
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 06:04 -0500, hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
[...]
I realize this question might be provokative, but I've never seen this
comparison before and am genuinely interested in your opinion.
Both java and browser/JS are cross platform. Both are available on
almost
every device
Wrong.
Android has the highest smart phones market share (Samsung alone became th
largest smart phones producer in the world). It's recent news.
-Giuseppe
Il giorno 21/nov/2011 02:15, David Robillard d...@drobilla.net ha scritto:
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 06:04 -0500, hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011, at 02.44.00, Giuseppe Zompatori
silicon...@gmail.com wrote:
Wrong.
Android has the highest smart phones market share (Samsung alone became th
largest smart phones producer in the world). It's recent news.
...but, that's not really Java, is it? Different VM (Dalvik)
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 02:44 +0100, Giuseppe Zompatori wrote:
Wrong.
Android has the highest smart phones market share (Samsung alone
became th largest smart phones producer in the world). It's recent
news.
I said most popular smart phone, not most popular smart phone OS.
Either way, apps
22 matches
Mail list logo
