Am 3. März 2012 23:29 schrieb Paul Davis :
>
>> OSC
>
> this general language is the whole problem.
>
> you can't send OSC to "an OSC capable plugin" or "an external OSC
> application" in any generalized sense, because there is no shared
> format for the messages.
>
> the sequence of messages that
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 00:55 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, Paul, I understand that you have plenty of other important stuff
> on your TODO list for Ardour3. I'm not complaining. The reason that I
> brought up Ardour in this context was that I seem to recall reading
> something on the
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 23:20 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 08:25 PM, David Robillard wrote:
> > Sure, you could just implement dumb raw OSC recording and playback, but
> > there's little point in using a DAW for that (not to mention little
> > practical musical use)
>
> But that's exac
On 03/03/2012 11:36 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
I use Algoscore for sequencing OSC.
http://kymatica.com/Software/AlgoScore
Hi Robin,
thanks for the pointers. Yes I know about AlgoScore and Iannix, but
that's not quite what I had in mind.
There was a presentation at Piksel a few years back abou
On 03/03/2012 11:29 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
you can't send OSC to "an OSC capable plugin" or "an external OSC
application" in any generalized sense, because there is no shared
format for the messages.
Yes, there is. It's the OSC format itself. If you want to keep it
simple, you could boil it dow
On 03/03/2012 11:20 PM, Albert Graef wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 08:25 PM, David Robillard wrote:
>> Sure, you could just implement dumb raw OSC recording and playback, but
>> there's little point in using a DAW for that (not to mention little
>> practical musical use)
>
> But that's exactly what I wan
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Albert Graef wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 08:25 PM, David Robillard wrote:
>>
>> Sure, you could just implement dumb raw OSC recording and playback, but
>> there's little point in using a DAW for that (not to mention little
>> practical musical use)
>
>
> But that's exact
On 03/03/2012 08:25 PM, David Robillard wrote:
Sure, you could just implement dumb raw OSC recording and playback, but
there's little point in using a DAW for that (not to mention little
practical musical use)
But that's exactly what I want. For starters, even just simple messages
consisting o
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 07:36 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 06:50 AM, David Robillard wrote:
> > There is also the chicken& egg problem, last I checked there wasn't an
> > OSC note standard in use anywhere to have Ardour send...
>
> I don't see why an OSC track should make any assumpti
On 03/03/2012 07:36 AM, Albert Graef wrote:
I don't see why an OSC track should make any assumptions about the
semantics of OSC messages.
For optimized representation and editing.
Avoiding artificial restrictions can give you both freedom and clumsiness ;)
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's desig
Greetings,
I'm pleased to announce the release of Non-DAW and Non-Mixer version
1.1.0. It's been a while since the last release. But, I assure you,
the project is still alive and well.
This release includes a number of fixes and some minor improvements to
the build system. The big changes are:
*
11 matches
Mail list logo
