On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:29 AM, John Rigg wrote:
>
>
> To be fair I wasn't really slagging off Windows and Mac users. Most pro
> audio
> engineers are using those after all. I'm just bemused by the attitude that
> audio processing tools should be anything more than that. Pretty pictures
> and dum
Hi,
I was a long term jackd1 user and my first action on a new linux
installation (mostly using Ubuntu) was normally to remove pulseaudio as
it was badly configured and/or buggy. Things have changed and I really
started to like PA for everyday stuff. And then jackdbus came along
which togeth
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 12:03:41PM +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:29 AM, John Rigg wrote:
> > To be fair I wasn't really slagging off Windows and Mac users. Most pro
> > audio
> > engineers are using those after all. I'm just bemused by the attitude that
> > audio processin
Right, I hear you John. But I did look at pro mastering software on
Windows, I don't
remember any unnecessary restrictions.
My message would that I oppose this sort of a sweeping judgment of a whole
audio platform.
There might be some concrete examples, sure, but if you mean that in
general all or
Le Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:21:59 +0100,
Kjetil Matheussen a écrit :
> William Light:
> > it's interesting to me that free (source and/or beer) music
> > software on
> > OSX and windows has come further than it has on Linux. off the top
> > of my head:
> >
> > http://psycle.pastnotecut.org/portal.php
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Dominique Michel wrote:
> In the past, I done such a rt conversion on a dsp. It was working very
> well but need some parameters to be carefully chosen. The only way to
> chose those parameters are with a visual signal analysis. The timbre of
> an instrument is uni
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:16:48AM +, John Rigg wrote:
> By "dumbed down" I mean restricted in a way which may result in
> inexperienced users making fewer mistakes, but will also inconvenience
> more advanced users. An example of this would be a high mid EQ that won't
> sweep above 8kHz. What
Am 09.02.2013 12:38, schrieb Dominique Michel:
Is is a few applications that claim to be able to do that. By example
guitarixhttp://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2011/1/7/177338
but in practice, it is total unusable.
Quote: "Guitarix offers this, Given, you play with good intonation/a
well tuned
Hi James,
On 02/09/2013 01:11 PM, James Stone wrote:
Hi Flo, I am also running Ubuntu 12.10 and using jackdbus. It is
really nice for things like playing along to youtube videos.. On my
computer, I noticed that jack does have a tendency to lockup after a
while when jackdbus is running. I had t
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> I use very large period sizes, 1024 or even 2048. The problem of
> jackd starting to eat 100% cpu occurs usually when I'm done with my
> current work (recording something or fiddling around) and just leave
> it running idly.
On 02/09/2013 01:36 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
I use very large period sizes, 1024 or even 2048. The problem of
jackd starting to eat 100% cpu occurs usually when I'm done with my
current work (recording something or fiddling ar
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:20:58PM +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> Right, I hear you John. But I did look at pro mastering software on
> Windows, I don't
> remember any unnecessary restrictions.
> My message would that I oppose this sort of a sweeping judgment of a whole
> audio platform.
> There mig
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:26 PM, John Rigg wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:20:58PM +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> > Right, I hear you John. But I did look at pro mastering software on
> > Windows, I don't
> > remember any unnecessary restrictions.
> > My message would that I oppose this sort of
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:16 AM, John Rigg wrote:
> I will stress that I'm talking about audio engineering tools, not music
> creation software here. I do appreciate that users of the latter have very
> different requirements.
I was reading your post, about to vocalize the counter-argument, but
Hey all!
I have a simple enough question, but I don't know the best practice for
solving it, so figured I'd ask.
There's an LV2 synth running in a LV2 host. The synth exposes its operation
trough control ports.
Option 1:
The plugin can bind incoming MIDI events to these control ports values,
allo
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 01:01 +, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> I have a simple enough question, but I don't know the best practice for
> solving it, so figured I'd ask.
> There's an LV2 synth running in a LV2 host. The synth exposes its operation
> trough control ports.
>
> Option 1:
>
I'm looking for a simple tool where I can point it at an http audio stream,
define a number of seconds to detect silence and exit with a non-zero status if
silence is detected. It seems like this should be easy but I've been search
high and low for such a utility and nothing simple exists. Un
17 matches
Mail list logo
