So tap-plugins is wrong. The -lm comes *before* the .o in the Makefile.
(what a crazy sunday...)
okay, and to finish the day (utc+2): this problem has been
solved since february in the svn of tap-plugins.
See:
http://tap-plugins.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tap-plugins/tap-plugins/Makefile?revisio
On 05/18/2014 09:04 PM, Filipe Coelho wrote:
On 05/18/2014 07:50 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
Ubuntu is wrong too. Debian is okay. So it might be ubuntu the
guilty one in there. I sent an email to the list
ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com
(https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2014-May/007660.html
On 05/18/2014 07:50 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
Ubuntu is wrong too. Debian is okay. So it might be ubuntu the
guilty one in there. I sent an email to the list
ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com
(https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2014-May/007660.html)
I think this is caused by -Wl,--as-needed
On 05/18/2014 01:11 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
On 05/18/2014 12:57 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
but this is really strange that the tap .so files
are not linked against the libm.
okay, I downloaded KXStudio_14.04b_64bit.iso and indeed
all the /usr/lib/ladspa/tap_*.so in it are *not* linked against
the l
On 05/18/2014 01:11 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
On 05/18/2014 12:57 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
but this is really strange that the tap .so files
are not linked against the libm.
okay, I downloaded KXStudio_14.04b_64bit.iso and indeed
all the /usr/lib/ladspa/tap_*.so in it are *not* linked against
the l
On 05/18/2014 12:57 PM, Cedric Roux wrote:
but this is really strange that the tap .so files
are not linked against the libm.
okay, I downloaded KXStudio_14.04b_64bit.iso and indeed
all the /usr/lib/ladspa/tap_*.so in it are *not* linked against
the libm.
The official tap plugins Makefile for 0
because they are compiled with -lm
try to build the test program with:
gcc -o bug bug.c -ldl -lm
but this is really strange that the tap .so files
are not linked against the libm.
On 05/18/2014 12:57 PM, Zlobin Nikita wrote:
Yet, on gentoo all right. So, problem seems to be invalid.
But strange
Yet, on gentoo all right. So, problem seems to be invalid.
But strange, how other hosts can load these ladspa, if loading requires
dlopen() too %/.
> This. Is. Weird.
>
> Did you compile the tap plugins yourself?
> If yes: what version do you have? how did you compile it?
> If no: what linux dis
ubuntu 12.04 with kxstudio upgrade.
hm, it is from kxstudio team repos.
0.7.2
> This. Is. Weird.
>
> Did you compile the tap plugins yourself?
> If yes: what version do you have? how did you compile it?
> If no: what linux distribution do you use?
>
> On 05/18/2014 12:42 PM, Zlobin Nikita wrote:
This. Is. Weird.
Did you compile the tap plugins yourself?
If yes: what version do you have? how did you compile it?
If no: what linux distribution do you use?
On 05/18/2014 12:42 PM, Zlobin Nikita wrote:
No dependency on libm.
$ ldd /usr/lib/ladspa/tap_echo.so
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x0
No dependency on libm.
$ ldd /usr/lib/ladspa/tap_echo.so
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fff9dffe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f9472f16000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f9473523000)
> Okay, seems there is a problem with the libm
> (math librar
Oops, wrong email destination.
Sorry, i did not know about dlerror().
Output:
dlopen failed: /usr/lib/ladspa/tap_echo.so (dlerror:
/usr/lib/ladspa/tap_echo.so: undefined symbol: __powf_finite)
dlerror? (null)
> In my code I call dlerror to print the error.
> What is printed?
> And can you send m
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Zlobin Nikita wrote:
> Code - includes are omited, line with main() declaration is numbered
>
> 30: int main (int argc, char ** argv)
> {
> //LADSPAPluginSearch(describePluginLibrary);
> char plugpath [] = "/usr/lib/ladspa/tap_echo.so";
>
> Am 18.05.2014 09:10, schrieb Zlobin Nikita:
> > All plugins are in /usr/lib/ladspa, and this path is in LADSPA_PATH.
> > Otherwise all other ladspa hosts should not find anything, but they do.
>
> So then I'm sorry, I'm out of ideas what it could be, as it works here
> very well. :-(
>
> One th
Sorry, just forgot to add newline, and did not notice output %)
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Am 18.05.2014 09:10, schrieb Zlobin Nikita:
All plugins are in /usr/lib/ladspa, and this path is in LADSPA_PATH.
Otherwise all other ladspa hosts should not find anything, but they do.
So then I'm sorry, I'm out of ideas what it could be, as it works here
very well. :-(
One thing you could t
All plugins are in /usr/lib/ladspa, and this path is in LADSPA_PATH.
Otherwise all other ladspa hosts should not find anything, but they do.
> Am 18.05.2014 08:01, schrieb Zlobin Nikita:
> > Tried to run this tool - no plugins in list %)
>
> Do you use x86 system? Maybe your plugs are in usr/lib6
17 matches
Mail list logo
