Excellent.
The less mailman to configure for me on Debian-based systems, the better! ;)
May 6th sounds good! Any thoughts on what time? I suppose early evening?
8PM okay?
So many new mailing lists with interesting topics as of late!
I just subscribed to the one you mentioned below.
What are your
Sorry, forgot to commit :) git push did nothing, and I didn't see it.
Lg Gerald
On 21.04.2015 20:49, Guido Scholz wrote:
> but a "git push" seem to be missing yet.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxa
Hey all,
May 6th works out for me too. 8PM sounds good also.
-w
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, at 09:04, David Runge wrote:
> Excellent.
>
> The less mailman to configure for me on Debian-based systems, the better!
> ;)
> May 6th sounds good! Any thoughts on what time? I suppose early evening?
> 8PM okay?
Hey everyone!
I was reading what you, Fons, wrote, and I must say that I very strongly
disagree with the direction your arguments are taking.
1. "If a developer holds some views that go against those of the average
user he will have some very good reasons for that."
I guess this is irrelevant
Nice!
May 6th is good :)
[]'s
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:07 AM, William Light wrote:
> Hey all,
> May 6th works out for me too. 8PM sounds good also.
>
> -w
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, at 09:04, David Runge wrote:
> > Excellent.
> >
> > The less mailman to configure for me on Debian-based systems
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Louigi Verona
wrote:
>
> Linux Audio packages are plagued by reasons that are relevant to the
> developer, but which should be irrelevant to the user.
> I don't care if dev thinks knobs are a bad idea, I want a knob and not a
> text field, because it is easier to
Sure. This was only an example. It could have been any other feature or GUI
element.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Paul Davis
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Louigi Verona
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Linux Audio packages are plagued by reasons that are relevant to the
>> developer, but wh
I would like to comment on two things in your list:
Am 19.04.2015 um 00:40 schrieb Harry van Haaren:
> 1: Splash Screen
I would rephrase that to: show something as quickly as possible. If you
need to load stuff, do it in the background, but show the main GUI
window already (possibly with a loadin
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Louigi Verona wrote:
Linux Audio packages are plagued by reasons that are relevant to the
developer, but which should be irrelevant to the user.
I don't care if dev thinks knobs are a bad idea, I want a knob and
not a text field, because i
Am Wed, 22. Apr 2015 um 09:45:23 +0200 schrieb Gerald:
Hi Gerald,
> Sorry, forgot to commit :) git push did nothing, and I didn't see it.
attached you find a patch to get rid of an other ugly warning message
which also enables a slightly smarter frequency number display.
Guido
--
http://wie-im
I don't understand why speakers are using the analog output cable for
sound. How about, use a digital interface like HDMI or USB?
Can anyone recommend high quality speakers I can purchase which use a
digital interface to my computer?
___
Linux-audio-dev
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> I don't understand why speakers are using the analog output cable for
> sound. How about, use a digital interface like HDMI or USB?
>
someone you need to convert from digital to analog. do you want one DAC per
speaker when you could have on
[The posting to LAA is awaiting moderator approval for 2 days, so I take the
liberty of cross-posting]
Hi,
during LAC2015 in Mainz last week, I gave a lightning talk on what I called
"The LAC2014 Percussion Combo". It was a presentation about a little field
recording session conducted one year e
I am imagining this setup:
Plug a USB or HDMI cable into my computer.
Plug the other end into a hub.
5 speakers and a subwoofer all plug into the hub.
Plug the hub into a AC power outlet.
So there would still be one DAC, and it would be in the hub. Is a DAC
really that expensive? Why can't they b
Build your own with some (nice, affordable) boards from Hong Kong:
http://www.yuan-jing.com/dacs-decoder
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> I am imagining this setup:
>
> Plug a USB or HDMI cable into my computer.
> Plug the other end into a hub.
> 5 speakers and a subwoofer
HDMI cables will add up latency (because of the TV/monitor processing),
some ms but perceptible if you're recording a live performance and
monitoring it.
One DAC per speaker may cause time drift problems.
The best solution is use a high-quality external soundcard with studio
monitors. onboard sound
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 06:34:25AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> A knob is ok if it works similar. Knobs that insist that I touch the
> knob pointer and move that in a tiny arch to adjust and where the
> pointer flips from one end to the other if I make the wrong move are
> not easier to move on stag
Hi, Clean version available of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer:
http://gsequencer.org/downloads/ags-0_4_2-52.tar.bz2
A half year later after releasing 0.4.2 its end is fourseeing, for now
me should be able to do extensive testing.
To compile and run:
./configure
make ags
./ags
bests
Joël Krähemann
On 04/22/2015 09:10 PM, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> I don't understand why speakers are using the analog output cable for
> sound. How about, use a digital interface like HDMI or USB?
>
> Can anyone recommend high quality speakers I can purchase which use a
> digital interface to my computer?
>
For
Hi Guido, thanks for the patch. I applied and pushed it up. Haven't
tested it though.
I'm thinking of using falktx's DPF lib to make GuitarSynth a plugin.
Will deal with that on friday. Meanwhile,
can someone point me to a paper or some code on polyphonic pitch
detection or even blind source separa
On 04/22/15 21:33, Andrew Kelley wrote:
Plug a USB or HDMI cable into my computer.
Plug the other end into a hub.
5 speakers and a subwoofer all plug into the hub.
You can have exactly this with Audio-over-Ethernet (AES67 is all the
rage these days), but you would be surprised how expensive th
Would the pitch detection be easier with a hex pickup with individual
channels for each string?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Gerald wrote:
> Hi Guido, thanks for the patch. I applied and pushed it up. Haven't
> tested it though.
> I'm thinking of using falktx's DPF lib to make GuitarSynth a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:43:11AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> Just one little note here. Back in 2001, I read an article in the US
> Keyboard magazine that made a strong case for stopping the use of
> skuomorphic GUIs (knobs etc) for a variety of reasons. It wasn't written by
> a software develope
definately, but that comes with the cost of extra hardware (pickup,
6chan soundcard). I would build that into GuitarSynth if I had that gear.
But I'm also rather interested multipitch out of one signal. It's just
more convenient too
Gerald
On 23.04.2015 00:03, Jesse Cobra wrote:
> Would the pitch
Op 23-apr.-2015 00:14 schreef "Fons Adriaensen" :
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:43:11AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > Just one little note here. Back in 2001, I read an article in the US
> > Keyboard magazine that made a strong case for stopping the use of
> > skuomorphic GUIs (knobs etc) for a v
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
unsubscribe
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
27 matches
Mail list logo
