On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Gordonjcp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:26:55PM +0100, Markus Seeber wrote:
> > >> and be done with it, let offensive software die. In my eyes writing a
> plugin GUI
> > >> in GTK/Qt is very bad practice for exactly these reasons.
> > > So what would you wr
On 12/12/2017 04:02 PM, Gordonjcp wrote:
> That doesn't answer the question, really. For one thing, statically
> linking *anything* is utterly ridiculous and anyone doing that now or
> indeed at any point in the past 30 years of Unix development should have
> their hands cut off.
Keep in mind th
On 12.12.2017 16:02, Gordonjcp wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:26:55PM +0100, Markus Seeber wrote:
and be done with it, let offensive software die. In my eyes writing a plugin GUI
in GTK/Qt is very bad practice for exactly these reasons.
So what would you write it in instead?
You can still
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:26:55PM +0100, Markus Seeber wrote:
> >> and be done with it, let offensive software die. In my eyes writing a
> >> plugin GUI
> >> in GTK/Qt is very bad practice for exactly these reasons.
> > So what would you write it in instead?
> >
> You can still statically link fo