Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-08-05 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 10:07 -0400, David Robillard wrote: On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 12:59 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote: On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 23:16 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote: This testing is great stuff. It would be cool to have a buildbot (http://buildbot.net) and run this regularly

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-08-04 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 23:16 +0300, Stefan Kost wrote: This testing is great stuff. It would be cool to have a buildbot (http://buildbot.net) and run this regularly. Ideally test-tools would be part of ladspa/lv2 sdk and the plugin-packages add running the test tools as part of make check.

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread Damon Chaplin
Hi, I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed. I've tried the demolition test app as well. The output isn't too clear so I've summarised the major issues spotted: Demolition Findings CALF 34049 Calf MultiChorus

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:55 +0200, xmag wrote: Hi, I wrote all the Glame* filters, did you send me an email, and if, where did you send it :-) I sent Steve Harris an email about some issues in the swh plugins, but no problems were spotted in the Glame* filters by my test app. What is

Re: [LAD] LV2 test apps?

2009-07-30 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:27 +0100, james morris wrote: Are there any similar testing tools for LV2 plugins? Although I'm familiar with gdb and valgrind, I don't know how to go about using these with plugins, and I guess/assume a simple host (perhaps one specifically designed for testing)

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-28 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:44 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote: [Damon Chaplin] caps memory errors in 3 plugins Thanks for pointing out the make invocation. I haven't used valgrind before so my cluelessness may show again in what follows. Anyway, when running this: $ valgrind --tool=memcheck

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-28 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:02 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote: Testing 2589: C* ToneStack - Tone stack emulation (caps.so) ==9992== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==9992==at 0x4129F9F: DSP::ToneStack::start_cycle(float**, int) (ToneStack.h:103) ==9992

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-28 Thread Damon Chaplin
A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version. So the current status is: amb OK blopOK calfmemory errors in 2 plugins capsOK cmt OK fil OK ladspa OK mcp OK rev OK swh memory

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-28 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 14:12 -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: Hi Damon, On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Damon Chaplin wrote: A quick update - fixes have been found for blop, caps cmt, and the ladspa Sine plugin problem is fixed in the latest version. Great job! Did you update your test

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-28 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:08 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: Hi Damon, thanks for your efforts. How does your test compare to the ladspa demolition thing? They're pretty similar actually. Unfortunately I hadn't heard of demolition - maybe it should be mentioned on ladspa.org or go in the SDK.

Re: [LAD] SynthForge - new modular synth builder

2009-06-29 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 14:26 +0200, hollun...@gmx.at wrote: does the build depend on the swh plugins or are they just necessary because you wouldn't be able to do anything without them? In other words: are they a compiletime dependency? No, it should compile fine without them. They are used

Re: [LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

2009-06-18 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 20:58 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: 2009/6/18 Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net: 5. Add something like this to the API: struct { float value; const char *name; } ladspa_port_value_enum; struct ladspa_port_value_enum *

Re: [LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

2009-06-18 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 23:23 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote: Sorry, didn't see that. Well, I guess there's no problem on the plugin side then... any other possible problems on the host side? In case there are none, we could add an array or another callback. You'd need a way to let the host

Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...

2009-05-19 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 11:37 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: the main question, at least in my mind, is all about *which* settings will be used to auto-start the server, isn't it? an explicit command line, as in classic, should *always* take precedence over the settings in any internal

Re: [LAD] pipe/cond/semaphore/etc benchmarks

2007-06-09 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 14:18 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: Hi all, I remember a while back someone posting results of a benchmark to compare performance of pipes vs cond vs semaphores, but I can't find the specific post or code in the archives for the life of me. Does anyone have the /code/