Hi,
I'm impressed by my recent discovery: non-daw and especially non-sequencer:
http://non.tuxfamily.org/
I love the design of the sequencer, it's very intuitive, userfriendly
and fast! Respect for that!
But I couldn't contact the author. So I was wondering, maybe he is on
this (lad) list?
Maurizio De Cecco wrote:
Hallo,
This is a serious question for Linux Audio and in general multi media
applications developers.
I am in the program committee of the conference part of a Linux related
even in france (called Salon Linux), and we are discussing about the
2010 conference
Hi,
There are quite some people who like to have a better Lilypond MIDI
output. But they lack some people who are able and want to work on it.
That's why I send this message.
There are some improvements using the Articulate midi script:
http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate
And
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 08/06/2009 03:16 AM, David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:53 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
From TFA:
--8--
Go to System-Preferences-Sound, click on the Devices tab, and check
out the pulldown menu next to ‘Sound
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
On 08/06/2009 04:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
This is why I know so many people who never ever will use Linux, because
of noise like yours Paul.
And your point is what exactly? That Paul should give a toss about
those people? That he or others on this list
David Robillard wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 21:53 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
From TFA:
--8--
Go to System-Preferences-Sound, click on the Devices tab, and check
out the pulldown menu next to ‘Sound Events’ at the top of the panel.
You will see
Damon Chaplin wrote:
Hi,
I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all
the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed.
Great work! We need good plugins! :)
Regards.
\r
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:44 PM, lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
Robert Keller wrote:
Dear linux-audio developers,
I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
visor/
Thanks
for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I will populate the
source later today, as I need time to get acquainted with their
system, but I have to be
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 05:08:49 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Dear linux-audio developers,
I have created New Project https://sourceforge.net/projects/impro-
visor/
Thanks
for Impro-Visor, which is its correct name. I
alex stone wrote:
Just on a more serious note, amidst all this mayhem and frivolity, we
forked a project recently to more specifically add and modify a set of
tools for a defined purpose.
Unlike this trainwreck, we not only tried our best to do so in a
decent way, but the original author was
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything else I should have?
I appreciate your help.
In Copying it's say: GPLv2 or at your
Robert Keller wrote:
I fixed it to v2. Thanks!
Bob
Bob,
We don't post on top. Quote the relevant part and place your message
below, because of our mail archive ;)
About the licenses. I think Impro-visor should have the same license of
the GPL source you use (Jmusic or something(?)).
About
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
I fixed it to v2. Thanks!
Bob
Bob,
We don't post on top. Quote the relevant part and place your message
below, because of our mail archive ;)
Sorry
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 13:58:06 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Robert Keller wrote:
Arnold, thank you. I think I have everything in SF now. I added GPL
notice to the package-info.java files and added INSTALL.txt,
COPYING.txt, and LICENSE.txt.
Is there anything
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
My recommendation is, that Bob forge the project within the next 3
month, that he will be the head of the project, but coders from the
community get access to the source directories, after they have shown by
some patches, that they are able to program, or what ever the
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 27 July 2009 13:10:50 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I have contacted sourceForge
about his posting of sources relating to the project, and they
suggested filing a copyright infringement (the project is copyright by
me and Harvey Mudd College).
You don't
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
While I'd normally respect the private nature of any
message, this one goes well above any reasonable limit
so I do feel free to quote it:
- Forwarded message from lase...@gmail.com -
From: lase...@gmail.com
To: Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net
Date:
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 26 July 2009 15:53:30 nescivi wrote:
On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:31:10 lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Impro-Visor compiles in the jMusic code, which makes it even more
evident that there is a violation. And the header clearly mentions
using jMusic. So
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:09:26 you wrote:
While you have every right to fork the code, one quibble I have (most
likely just with your wording) is where you say that they are
obligated to provide the binary. They have no such obligation
whatsoever. If they
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:04:05 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 25 July 2009 14:09:26 you wrote:
While you have every right to fork the code, one quibble I have (most
likely just with your wording) is where you say
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Apart from that, I will be looking into forking Impro-visor in the next few
days. After making contact with the responsible parties about the GPL
violations, I have received no reply and the source code has not been
posted along with the binaries as is legally
lase...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks man. I'll forward this to Bob Keller too.
I think he mentioned in a message that he is willing to give developers
svn access to the recent code.
Really. Last year I found Improvisor and wanted to contribute to it,
so I got in contact with Bob. I
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jun 11, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
lasconic wrote:
I took some time yesterday night to take a look to improvisor code and
estimate the cost of adding musicXML export. Import is indeed more
complicated.
I downloaded the code of improvisor 3.39. It's
Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Four-band parametric equaliser LV2 plugin. DSP code by Fons Adriaensen.
Homepage: http://nedko.arnaudov.name/soft/lv2fil/
Screenshot: http://nedko.arnaudov.name/soft/lv2fil/lv2fil.png
Tarball download:
http://nedko.arnaudov.name/soft/lv2fil/lv2fil-2.0.tar.bz2
lasconic wrote:
I took some time yesterday night to take a look to improvisor code and
estimate the cost of adding musicXML export. Import is indeed more
complicated.
I downloaded the code of improvisor 3.39. It's the last and only code
available. Improvisor inner model is a little bit
raymond wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2009 08:19:56 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
lasconic wrote:
I took some time yesterday night to take a look to improvisor code and
estimate the cost of adding musicXML export. Import is indeed more
complicated.
I downloaded the code of improvisor 3.39
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jun 11, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
lasconic wrote:
I took some time yesterday night to take a look to improvisor code and
estimate the cost of adding musicXML export. Import is indeed more
complicated.
I downloaded the code of improvisor 3.39. It's
.
Maybe some devs can help this application with ALSA and/or Jack support?
Kind regards,
\r
---BeginMessage---
I got this reply from the main developer:
---BeginMessage---
On Jun 9, 2009, at 12:44 PM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
I've found a very interesting application, Improvisor
*Impro
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Where is the application hosted???
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 22:39 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
This is an very interesting application, and it is released as GPL software.
The only drawback on GNU/Linux is that sound is not working very well,
at least in my
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~keller/jazz/improvisor/
Thats the user-manual or something. Where is the *.jar, *.zip or how
this is distributed?
The download link leads to Yahoo ...
yeah you have to subsribe there... before you can download.
I'll sent the file to
I've uploaded Improvisor here, so you don't have to subscribe to yahoo
groups:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ANIZYM07
Maybe someone has a better place for it?
\r
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
This is an very interesting application, and it is released as GPL
software.
The only drawback on GNU
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
I've uploaded Improvisor here, so you don't have to subscribe to yahoo
groups:
Ok, sorry I was to quick with that.
I'd prefer you didn't. If there are developers who are serious, I could
provide svn access to our repository. Right now there are 3 people who
Justin Smith wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:00 AM, David García Garzón
dgar...@iua.upf.edu wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 18:19:19 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
David García Garzón wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:45:40 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
David García Garzón
David García Garzón wrote:
Hi, lads! Some news from the CLAM project.
For anyone interested in that subject, we managed to build Qt based VST
interfaces (from linux!). Not about integrating existing VST in Qt
applications but building brand new plugins using Qt. This is an step to get
David García Garzón wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:45:40 Grammostola Rosea wrote:
David García Garzón wrote:
Hi, lads! Some news from the CLAM project.
For anyone interested in that subject, we managed to build Qt based VST
interfaces (from linux!). Not about integrating
Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Hey Ico,
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand what you mean. While I would
encourage the people from the Debian Multimedia Team to subscribe to a
list
like linux-audio-tuning to discuss tuning issues and grab ideas from here,
I don't see how we could provide
Hi,
I'm just an Lilypond user, not an programmer. I really think Lilypond is
a core app for GNU/Linux musicians and many apps has Lilypond export
functions. To keep improving Lilypond and because some people are
starting to work on some Tablature improvements, which makes me really
excited,
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Fraser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
I suggest add a 'chapter' in the wiki of linuxaudio.org with
information about maintaining packages. The information about
Debian/Ubuntu you can find in my link. But I can
Fraser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
I suggest add a 'chapter' in the wiki of linuxaudio.org with information
about maintaining packages. The information about Debian/Ubuntu you can
find in my link. But I can imagine that also other
Hans Fugal wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Changed the title, cause it's an important discussion opened by Fraser imo.
\r
I think it is, too. I've maintained a few Debain packages in the past
(don't have time at the moment), so I can weigh in.
The documentation is out
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Hey Ico,
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand what you mean. While I would
encourage the people from the Debian Multimedia Team to subscribe to a
list
like linux-audio-tuning to discuss tuning issues and grab ideas from
here,
I don't
Dennis Schulmeister wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:48 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
3. Documentation - especially man pages which are required for all
binaries (even if they just refer to online documentation or info
pages). This requirement is often skipped for Ubuntu-only
Dennis Schulmeister wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:48 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
3. Documentation - especially man pages which are required for all
binaries (even if they just refer to online documentation or info
pages). This requirement is often skipped for Ubuntu-only
help in building, maintaining and/or
testing!
Thanks in advance,
\r
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
There is an promising discussion on the debian-dev mailinglist. Maybe
some people who knows more about realtime kernels could join. Also
users who might want
MarcO'Chapeau wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:25:38 -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote:
I think you are missing my point. I am not proposing to start a replica
of
the Debian Multimedia initiative under the auspices of linuxaudio.org.
Rather, I am proposing that their efforts
Crypto wrote:
On Monday 09 March 2009 16:29:53 Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
My point was : if Debian Multimedia is just an effort to make things
better
looking on the audio/multimedia side, then it has more to do with the
Debian packages and process group of people than with the linuxaudio
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
Many of the people of the Linux audio community uses Debian or a
Debian based distro (Ubuntu (Studio), 64Studio, Musix, Sidux, Mepis
etc. etc.). Most of those distro's uses and rebuild the packages of
Debian (unstable).
There are a lot of audio packages
Hi,
Many of the people of the Linux audio community uses Debian or a Debian
based distro (Ubuntu (Studio), 64Studio, Musix, Sidux, Mepis etc. etc.).
Most of those distro's uses and rebuild the packages of Debian (unstable).
There are a lot of audio packages build by the Debian Multimedia Team,
Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Daire O'Neill wrote:
Hi all,
My name is Daire O'Neill. I've just joined the list to hopefully begin
my learning on audio development and possibly to contribute to some
current projects. As a beginner, I have only basic C/C++ skills, and
have never worked on
Hi,
A couples months ago we started a forum at linuxmusicians.com . Our aim
is to bring Linux musicians together and help each other to make music
on the Linux platform. We want to promote FLOSS software for making
music. We also want to make making music on Linux more accessible for
newbies
52 matches
Mail list logo
