evelopers. As far as I am concerned,
for about five years now I have not even looked at OSS anymore.
But should I reconsider?
Thanks
Victor
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Does this mean that pulseaudio is preferred to Jack?
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)
>> Basica
Ok: my next question is, given that a software has native
alsa support, Jack support, do we need to put some effort into
adding 1) pulse audio support and 2) OSS support?
Is that a good idea or is it just a waste of time?
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Vaughan" <[EM
or write a Csound plugin... just as easy...
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Darren Landrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Prototyping algorithms and ideas
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:22 -0500, Darren
, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Dr Victor Lazzarini
Senior Lecturer, Music
Music Technology Lab
NUI Maynooth
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi everyone,
what would be your suggestions as to the best setup (parameters/patches)
for customising 2.6.25 regarding scheduling and realtime audio?
Thanks
Victor
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http
and in case any of you are curious about the little green laptop and
you happen to be at the ICMC next Monday, come and
see it there at around 9:20 in the morning
http://www.icmc2008.net/programme/schedule/paper?type2=studio
I hope to be able to amuse you with a little talk...
Regards
Victor
I was told to revert to 2.6.24.17 (not possible in my specific
case, but there you go), in this list. Or to join the tuner's list.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Claassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux-Audio-Dev"
Sent: Wednesday, August
The good news is that they seem to be tackling these problems. We might see
a much more RT-enabled linux in the future. I was quite optmistic after
reading that
blog.
In the meantime, looks like we should not touch 2.6.26, not even with a
bargepole.
Victor
>> http://kerneltrap.org
There is also pulseaudio, which is quite simple to program
and use in simple apps.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "David Cournapeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Spindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 4:36 PM
Subject
Gone is the dream of UNIX. Long it live.
> Solutions of simple problems, demanding several complex packages to be
> piped into one each other, does not take my fancy.
>
> ___
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> http:
Well, that dream was not mine but Dennis Ritchie's and
Ken Thompson's...
- Original Message -
From: "Jens M Andreasen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [LAD] [ot] c
However, doing so (writing apps using his API) is
dead easy.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Cournapeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Guide to Linux Soun
Gosh, I hope I have enough gusto to be re-building computers when
I get there (if I do), never mind programming in C (will it still exist?).
Impressive.
Victor
>
> Were I 20 years younger, which would put me in my mid-50's when I was
> carving
> machine code for 8 bit machines,
I think it's up to your MIDI destination to ignore the channel
information (so called 'omni' mode) is it not?
Regards
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Claassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux-Audio-Dev"
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2
I was trying to access the conference site, but I can't seem to be
able to. Is it down?
Victor
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
you can try using a bank of equaliser filters in parallel? The
Regalia and Mitra design ("Tunable Digital Frequency Response Equalization
Filters", IEEE Trans. on Ac., Sp. and Sig Proc., 35 (1), 1987) works
quite well.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Jörn Nettingsm
this. But I suppose you can get RT audio via
PyAudio (portaudio bindings) or the alsa python interface.
About calibration, I am not sure, but I guess this can be done
programmatically.
Other solutions: http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/
http://www.speech.kth.se/wavesurfer/
Victor
- Original
can be read and
enjoyed. Phase plots are no problem there. This is what I would
call something 'for the rest of us'.
Victor
===
as for phase plots, there is no solution i know of. most people who need
that kind of data are proficient with maths tools such as octav
In relation to pseudoscince bit, here is a good description of it:
http://skepdic.com/globalconsciousness.html
>> I am promoting the development and manufacture of a new music keyboard
>> capable of playing all traditional and some new musical scales.
>> Descriptions of both can be found on my web
there.
Victor
Ps.: I'm not driving, by the way...
==
I wouldn't really advise anyone to travel Malpensa-Parma by
car, certainly not during the night unless you have already
done it and know what to expect. Or you have a GPS navigator
in the car - using just visual roadsigns could mak
I would also like to add in my thanks. The conference was very well
organised
and, speaking for myself, I had a great time in Parma (even though my
computer
died on me before the end of my talk :(
Thanks to everyone who put a lot of effort in it. And long live LAC
Victor
- Original
query.
Have you got the FC WindowMaker package installed or is it a custom
-built version you have? The FC package should give you an extra
login option, but what do I know...
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Fons Adriaensen"
To: "Linux Audio Developers"
Sent: Sunda
Frank,
that is a very good job, really nice. Thanks so much.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Neumann"
To: ;
;
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 1:00 PM
Subject: [LAD] LAC2009: Conference material (papers, photos and more) now
online
>
> Hi,
>
> I fi
quot;could not find DLL" when we don't have
a dependency for one of our plugin modules. The sofware can
be run, but it's just annoying.
On Linux,it's much easier because the dependencis are just
packaged (RPM, .deb etc), so weak linking is not s
Hi everyone,
does anyone know where I can get the VesTige headers
easily without having to svn a whole package down?
Is it available anywhere?
Thanks
Victor___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.or
Thanks, Paul, I got it now.
Does anyone know whether it is possible to write fully-compatible
VST plugins with this header? It does seem to have a lot less than
the VST SDK headers on first looks. Or is this just meant for
writing hosts?
Thanks
Victor
- Original Message -
From
reimplement it alright).
My reasons for looking at this is that I would have liked to build
a VST plugin example from the ground up without having to
depend on the SDK, with LGPL or similar license. It's an
educational thing.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Cannam&quo
Hi everyone,
does anyone have any idea on the uptake of VST 3 ?
Is this becoming the standard and 2.* being quickly
deprecated?
Comparing the two, there is a lot of stuff in VST3, it
seems quite heavy, which seems to be a change
from the relative simplicity of 2.*. Also 3 does not look
backwa
Thanks, that answers my question!
- Original Message -
From: Ray Rashif
To: Linux Audio Developers
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [LAD] VST 2.4 v. 3.0
Currently, almost all open-source/Linux-based VST efforts make use of 2.3,
not even 2.4. As such, 3 i
Hi everyone,
changing a bit of the subject in this list, is anyone here going
to the ICMC? I'll be in Montreal for a week from 17/08, it'll be
nice to meet some of you there.
Regards
Victor
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux
things.
I am very happy to see this. One thing I thought was missing
from his text was what did he replace MaxMSP with. I was
wanting to read PD somewhere, but could not find it anywhere.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Barknecht"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 05,
investing the time
of your staff to support a bought closed-source product, you may
as well not invest the money too).
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Mardorf"
To: "victor"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Kim did the sw
ginal Message-
>> From: linux-audio-dev-boun...@lists.linuxaudio.org [mailto:linux-audio-
>> dev-boun...@lists.linuxaudio.org] On Behalf Of nescivi
>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:17 PM
>> To: linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
>> Subject: Re: [LAD] ICMC anyone?
>> Hehe... does mailman support an entrance examination? :)
>
> i guess majordomo is what you're looking for :-D
>
Aka the Butler... Jeeves ;)
Sorry, I couldn't resist. It's August.
V
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.or
re
at home.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Chuckk Hubbard"
To: "James Cameron"
Cc: ;
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] Kim did the switch to Linux
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:22 AM, James Cameron wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 07
use external programs to do it (although
it would be nice). The main thing is to be simple, load plugins on request,
no sequencing or that kind of stuff (otherwise I would just use Ardour or
LMMS). Just sound in and out, plus some MIDI.
Thanks!
Vi
#x27;ve got a lovely Godin with hex out and I am trying to find a friend who
is good with soldering to make a split cable for me (no luck yet...).
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Albert Graef"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] [PD-announce] smec
ire your own output splitter.
HTH
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "victor"
To: "Albert Graef" ; "The Linux Audio Developers'
Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] [PD-announce] smeck (6ch guitar processing patch)
Looks good, but expensive? No price on the site.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Barknecht"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] [PD-announce] smeck (6ch guitar processing patch)
released]
> Hallo,
> victor hat gesagt: // victor wr
o mine (getting rid of __cdecl). Whereas
this one just fixes the macro to keep the calling convention as it is.
I have not been able to test the plugin yet, perhaps I'll have a better idea
of what I should do then.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas&qu
yes, sorry I meant exactly that, but got it all mangled. Your solution
fixes the macro and is the ideal one. Then there should be no problems
as far as the calling convention is concerned. Sorry if I didn't make myself
clear.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Lopez-Caban
But I thought I read some mention in the VST SDK manual about
linux plugins being '.so', which would imply they at least acknowledged
its use in that platform. It might have been unix rather than linux.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Davis"
To: "
Hi Ian,
I have seen good results with wxPython. The guys in Montreal are using it
with great success, see for instance http://code.google.com/p/ounk/
We're also be hearing from them soon on the new version of a
certain Grand Lady, which uses wxPython too.
Victor
- Original Me
I suppose by virtue of Jack, it's possible to run SC, PD, Csound or anything
jackable as a separate process, and pretend it is a plugin to things like
Ardour.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "rosea grammostola"
To: "Linux Audio Developers"
Cc: "At
As an alternative, you can use PortMIDI. It's a fairly simple API and
I would recommend it.
Victor
- Origina
Victorl Message -
From: Harry Van Haaren
To: Carlo Capocasa ; linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 3:06 PM
Subject: Re:
Hi everyone,
Just a word to say that Csound 5.11 is out now. Here is
John ffitch's official announcement.
Victor
==
many of you may have heard the rumours, but it is true, Csound 5.11 is
now released and available from Sourceforge
The re
Would it be the case that Ardour etc are thinking this is a mono
file? A stereo file played as mono could sound half-speed (maybe
somewhat distorted, depending on the differences betweeen the channels).
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Martin"
To:
Sent: Monday,
y reasoning is wrong somewhere (it
could
well be, I often get things like that mixed up)?
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Martin"
To:
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Half speed audio playback issue
> Hi Victor,
>
>> Would it be
tracks.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Martin"
To: "victor"
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Half speed audio playback issue
> Hi Victor,
>
>> I thought something like that was happening. But I'm curious: if
Csound also uses jack_client_new(). Is there any document explaining what
needs to
be done to update to the new API?
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Emanuel Rumpf"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 3:41 PM
Subject: [LAD] jackd api change, fluidsynth, etc.
> In the
team does.
Thanks for your responses.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Knoth"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] jackd api change, fluidsynth, etc.
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 04:41:25PM +0200, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
>
>>
The minimal solution is quite simple - just use an
empty options argument. But while you're there you
(I mean all developers of jackified apps) should
IMNSHO add the option for the user to set the
application's name as a Jack client.
And of course read the actual name used af
.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Fons Adriaensen"
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] jackd api change, fluidsynth, etc.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:07:38PM +0100, victor wrote:
>
> The minimal solution is quite simple - jus
... seems to have been announced. I got an email from ICMA about it.
Why was it not announced here or in the Consortium list? I would
have thought these are the main places where you find good interest.
Any further news?
Victor___
Linux-audio-dev maili
that makes sense now, so someone jumped the gun. Anyway, it's good to know
it'll be happening.
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Gareus"
To: "victor"
Cc: "The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List"
; "Marc Groenewegen"
Sen
Even more OT: is WASAPI supported by PortAudio?
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Jussi Laako"
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] Anyone have experience with OSS (3 or 4)?
> On 12/17/2009 04:58 PM, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>> Throu
A quick look at WASAPI reference and examples seems to indicate it uses a
blocking IO method. Is there
a callback mode? Sorry for all of these OT questions, but I got really
curious. Can WASAPI match Linux and
OSX levels of latency?
Victor
- Original Message -
From: "Jussi Laako
I think it depends on whether you are happier with C or C++. I like portaudio
and have used it quite a bit as a simple way to add realtime audio to C
programs.
Victor
On 17 Mar 2012, at 01:12, Rafael Vega wrote:
> Let me rephrase that:
> Is RTAudio any better than PortAudio for implem
Ctirad Fertr wrote:
> Currently I store my
> albums into one flac file per CD plus separate CUE sheet. It's far from
> perfect. I would like to have just one file per album with all the content
> inside (eg. audio, pictures, lyrics, videoclips, bonuses, etc...) and player
> with direct acces t
That was not my experience. I put together a pulseaudio IO module
for Csound using the simple API (pulse/simple.h) in about half an hour.
It seemed much simpler than any alternative. And it seemed to do
everything I needed from it.
Victor
At 13:59 29/09/2008, you wrote:
>On Sun, 28.09.08 09
__cdecl and it will not be getting it.
Perhaps someone else would have a different solution.
Regards
Victor Lazzarini
Music Technology Laboratory
Music Department
National University of Ireland, Maynooth
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev
Dave , Andres and others
thanks for your suggestions. I am actually looking for this type
of host, for 'native' Linux plugins, not windows dlls.
Thanks
Victor
At 14:06 18/08/2009, Dave Phillips wrote:
>Andres Cabrera wrote:
> > Never mind. Just got "juced" and i
f a plugin
header file.
Victor
At 19:30 27/08/2009, victor wrote:
>yes, sorry I meant exactly that, but got it all mangled. Your solution
>fixes the macro and is the ideal one. Then there should be no problems
>as far as the calling convention is concerned. Sorry if I didn't make
Does anyone know anything about this change in alsa:
warning: snd_pcm_sw_params_set_xfer_align is deprecated (declared
at /usr/include/alsa/pcm.h:1115)
I just wanted to check background before fixing the code.
Regards
Victor___
Linux-audio-dev m
Well, there is a LADSPA plugin generator that uses Csound. I suppose it
can serve the basis for a LV2 version, if anyone has the time to write
it...
Victor
On 22 Sep 2009, at 11:36, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> 2009/9/22 rosea grammostola :
>> victor wrote:
>>> I suppose
Well if the audio was clipped, there would probably be some audible
distortion.
Perhaps if a code fragment was posted we could give a more informed
opinion.
Victor
On 26 Oct 2009, at 09:08, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 10/26/2009 07:33 AM, Drip Stone wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>&
I never looked at it, but is netjack built into jack now?
On 14 Nov 2009, at 16:23, Paul Davis wrote:
> JACK 0.117.0 is out. Please see the website http://jackaudio.org/ for
> all the details. Many improvements in netjack1 performance, and jack
> now runs in realtime mode by default.
> ___
ee). That's a very good forum for these discussions. Perhaps a Panel
discussion on 'desktop' versus 'pro-audio' could be set up.
Victor
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
ent this by using the correct constant
1000U
Victor
On 7 Dec 2009, at 19:22, Mario Lang wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just happened to stumble about a (what I call) pretty subtle
> bug in typical ALSA PCM code:
>
> r...@fzidpc73:/tmp# cat test.c
> #include
> int main() {
&
If you need software mixing, what is the problem with using Jack?
Victor
On 11 Dec 2009, at 13:24, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
> After about 10 years of frustration, I'm a bit tired of alsa.
>
> Does anyone know if OSS supports proper software mixing?
> Is the alsa emulat
This is very interesting, thanks. Learned a new thing today. I was
also not aware of sched_setaffinity()
this is actually something I always wondered existed, but had never
seen before.
Thanks a lot again
Victor
On 12 Dec 2009, at 17:47, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Recently on this
I would have thought at least Solaris should be able to do audio
reasonably well. Or am I wrong?
Victor
On 17 Dec 2009, at 05:45, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 17.12.09 00:42, Jussi Laako (ju...@sonarnerd.net) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12/16/2009 08:23 PM, Paul Davis wrote
Interesting comment. I would like to know what your opinion is of OSX
versus Linux in terms of RT capabilities and audio IO programming
environment,
if you could elaborate it a bit more.
Victor
On 17 Dec 2009, at 09:07, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>
> Le 17 déc. 2009 à 10:01, Victor Lazza
ck at application level.
Victor
On 17 Dec 2009, at 12:29, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Kjetil S. Matheussen
> wrote:
>> No. Not providing mixing for all devices is a design fault
>> in alsa. I'm going to install OSS as soon as I get time.
>
> Kjetil,
Well, with my ASIO devices if a program is using that audio card via
ASIO, other programs can't access it. It may well vary from driver to
driver then.
Victor
On 17 Dec 2009, at 12:52, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>
>>
Through which API? I not sure I understand audio IO on Vista, with the
concurrent existence of several APIs. Never mind, perhaps this is a
bit OT in a Linux Audio list...
Victor
On 17 Dec 2009, at 14:45, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 17.12.09 09:14, Paul Davis
Well said, especially this one.
On 7 Jan 2010, at 07:51, Stéphane Letz wrote:
> 3) Climate story is probably not the more important short term
> threat (although on long term it may be the one...), I would say
> "peak oil" is *the* short term threat but very few people understand
> that corr
similar problems.
To use portaudio on Linux, I always have to kill pulseaudio.
Otherwise, it's fine.
Victor
On 12 Jan 2010, at 20:11, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 07:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
>>
Torben,
this looks very interesting. Quite a lot of C++ complexity, though.
I'll keep following it to see where you are heading.
Regards
Victor
On 15 Jan 2010, at 09:03, torbenh wrote:
>
> hi...
>
> i am working on a c++0x DSP library.
> variadic templates prove to be
r not.
But it is an interesting example (even if it does not build) of what
(possibly) can be done with templates.
My question to the list is: has anyone managed to compile this code?
Regards
Victor
prime.cpp
Description: Binary data
___
Linux-
of course, when you read the error messages they say just that. Thanks
for the fix.
yes, it's insane. It's a good laugh, though.
Victor
On 16 Jan 2010, at 01:25, Dominic Sacré wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Victor Lazzarini
> wrote:
>> Torben's new p
What 16 thousand million? Who said there was no money in electronic
music instruments?
On 24 Jan 2010, at 15:06, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 17:46 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
>> I read about this Korg OASYS ...
>
>> ... Proprietary world is so full of wasted efforts, imho.
Hi Dave,
what do you mean by an Audio Function Generator?
Victor
On 30 Jan 2010, at 12:10, Dave Phillips wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> A respondent to my latest article for LJ has asked if I can
> recommend an
> audio function generator for Linux. He's using a command-line app
do you mean oscillators then?
On 30 Jan 2010, at 22:18, Folderol wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:59:11 +0100
> f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:51:13PM +, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> what do you mean by an
Pardon the ignorance, but are the RF signals brought down to AF before
AD conversion? Otherwise, it sounds like a silly SR will be needed. Is
this the flowchart?
antenna -> RF demodulation -> ADC -> your software -> DAC -> audio
So what exactly does your plugin do?
Victor
Hi everyone,
I think this CfP might interest some of the people on this list:
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/asp/si/mart.html
We welcome contributions from various related audio development areas,
as you will be able to see from the call, there is a wide scope in it.
all the best
Victor__
Hi everyone,
We have a new post in our department, which might interest some of you.
http://www.publicjobs.ie/publicjobs/en/star/goToJobDetails.do?id=419
Unfortunately, given my involvement in the selection process, I can't
answer any queries related to this post, but
my colleague Gordon Del
Hi everyone,
a question for one of your OSC gurus out there: is it possible/a good
idea to use OSC for syncing? How good is it for that kind of thing?
So far I have only used it for parameter control, but is there a good
means of using it with timing accuracy?
Thanks a lot
Victor
A simple question: can GPL plugins be loaded into non-free hosts?
This may appear a stupid question, but given the fact that non-free
code can't link to GPL binaries, what is the story with dynamic modules?
Thanks
Victor
___
Linux-audio-dev ma
GPL?
Victor
On 21 Jun 2010, at 12:34, Paul Davis wrote:
But I think that in the direction that you asked it then I think its a
little more restrictive, with the same proviso that Chris offered: you
as a user of a GPL'ed plugin can do whatever you want with it,
including load it into a no
ution, I may as well
not take the job.
Victor
On 21 Jun 2010, at 20:34, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Victor Lazzarini
wrote:
I think this is the closest to the scenario I am envisaging. There
is a
host, which is non-Free and commercial, currently using a non-Free
p
I am not expecting legal advice. I am a developer too, working
exclusively with Free software; I was never in a situation where I had
to check closely the GPL license, but I expect that someone here might
have had previous experience.
Victor
On 21 Jun 2010, at 20:47, Luis Garrido wrote
ks everyone for your responses.
Victor
On 21 Jun 2010, at 21:28, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Victor Lazzarini
wrote:
I am not expecting legal advice. I am a developer too, working
exclusively
with Free software; I was never in a situation where I had to check
closely
th
ader files too.
Sorry, I did not mean to make this discussion longer than it needs to
be, but...
Victor
On 22 Jun 2010, at 03:10, Paul Davis wrote:
I believe that the FSF has never written a version of the GPL that
really addresses this, which is why they need to say things like "We
beli
15/January 2011
Notification of acceptance: 7/March 2011
Camera-ready papers: 1/April 2011
Queries: Victor Lazzarini, NUI Maynnooth (victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie)
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.or
[Apologies for cross-postings] [Please distribute]
Paper-submission, call-for-music and registration are now open
for the Linux Audio Conference 2011 - May 6-8 2011, Maynooth, Ireland
More information: http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2011/
As in previous years, we will have a full program of talks, w
Not to mention Jazz musicians, arrangers, Debussy, Ravel, Stravinsky...
Sounds like a teutonic idea of Musik (sorry Joern...), rather than
anything else.
Victor
On 4 Nov 2010, at 12:02, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 11/04/2010 06:01 AM, Jens M Andreasen made my day with this
hilarious
If you were at LAC in Parma, you'd have heard a 3-part strictly
invertible counterpoint fugue I wrote, used as
an example for some distortion synthesis instruments. Just a bit of fun.
Victor
On 4 Nov 2010, at 15:48, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 11/04/2010 01:18 PM, Victor Lazzarini
Maybe jackrack is a good example to look at?
On 20 Nov 2010, at 19:25, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 06:50:02PM +, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
I've downloaded the SDK, but reading trough the "applyplugin.c" code
confused me more than it helped...
800+ lines is more than
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
