Re: [LAD] [LAU] [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Improvisor lilypond support!?]]

2009-06-09 Thread Dave Phillips
Grammostola Rosea wrote: re: Impro-Visor : > This is an very interesting application, and it is released as GPL > software. > The only drawback on GNU/Linux is that sound is not working very well, > at least in my experience: > http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=860 > > I dunno if th

Re: [LAD] [LAU] [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Improvisor lilypond support!?]]

2009-06-09 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Grammostola Rosea wrote: > I've uploaded Improvisor here, so you don't have to subscribe to yahoo > groups: > Ok, sorry I was to quick with that. "I'd prefer you didn't. If there are developers who are serious, I could provide svn access to our repository. Right now there are 3 people who a

Re: [LAD] [LAU] [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Improvisor lilypond support!?]]

2009-06-09 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dave Phillips wrote: > The JavaSound developers seem to have mistaken JACK for something like esd. > >  From http://www.jsresources.org/faq_misc.html#no_daemons : > ** > > "Why is there no artsd/esd support in Java Sound? > > In Florian's and my opinion, mixing daem

Re: [LAD] [LAU] [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Improvisor lilypond support!?]]

2009-06-09 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > > Dave - I've had this argument with at least one of them online > (somewhere). No, this particular person didn't get it and I suspect > the others won't either. The critical arguments are: > >    (a) the linux kernel has a general design principl