On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Ken Restivo wrote:
> If the new JACK session feature only saves things when I ask it to, then
> sure, that could be useful. Even better if it saves its state in a format
> that is human-readable and can be diff'ed, or put into git for versioning.
it doesn't chang
2010/3/9 Julius Smith :
> Since I always use shell scripts to get as close as I can to a
> particular set-up state, I would love to see more support for that, to
> the point that it doesn't have to look like scripting to an end user.
> For example, each app could respond to a message to return its
2010/3/9 Burkhard Wölfel :
>
> How would you share a complicated production setup, aka session, with
> other users? Script, or text explanation? Screenshot? Ardour audio
> project only? ... there are users out there waiting to hop on the linux
> audio boat
> as soon as there is an obvious way to
Am 06.03.2010 um 07:19 schrieb Ken Restivo :
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Gerald Mwangi
>> wrote:
>>> Hi, does anyone know a synth powerfull like zynadd, phasex or
>>> bristol,but in dssi format? I need something I can loa
Hi, well I'm also not the auto spellcheck guy. I just need something
that saves the state of the session. No auto bla bla. It should save,
when I click 'save session', pressumebly just causing all the apps to do
their internal save operation.
> +1 for Calf Monosynth and WhySynth. They, in additio
