On 08/18/2014 10:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Qtractor the fader for synth plugins is pre everything ;), that's bad
design, but I guess not the audio stream is controlled, but the synth
volume.
while on midi tracks, qtractor mixer/track faders simply deals midi
channel volume (cc#7) and panning
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> I would think ((Gain+54)/64)*7f uses a lot less CPU time than a real
> (proper) log. Think 8 fingers (plus thumbs?) fading around 80 steps in a
> small time. Remember that this calculation has to be done at both ends too
> and the receiv
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:00 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 17:44 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> > On a DAW, we sort of do this already by recording using the fader (and
> > audio device gain) for trim and then mixing down using the fader for fine
> > tuning. However, as I commented
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 17:44 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> On a DAW, we sort of do this already by recording using the fader (and
> audio device gain) for trim and then mixing down using the fader for fine
> tuning. However, as I commented earlier, sometimes a harsh effect can
> introduce the need to
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 08:24 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 09:45 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> >> A quick thought on fineness of control. It is true that 127 levels
> >> tends to "zipper". However, 127 levels is more than enough for static
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Will Godfrey wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:15:58 +
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 08:24:38AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
>>> So Allen & Heath uses 127 levels on their top end digital control
surfaces, How do they do it? Well they have two different scal
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:15:58 +
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 08:24:38AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
So Allen & Heath uses 127 levels on their top end digital control
surfaces, How do they do it? Well they have two different scales:
-
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:15:58 +
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 08:24:38AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
>
> > So Allen & Heath uses 127 levels on their top end digital control
> > surfaces, How do they do it? Well they have two different scales:
> > - fader: ((Gain+54)/64)*7f - al
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 08:24:38AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> So Allen & Heath uses 127 levels on their top end digital control
> surfaces, How do they do it? Well they have two different scales:
> - fader: ((Gain+54)/64)*7f - also used for sends
> - Gain: ((Gain-10)/55)*7f - this is preamp gain
S
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 09:45 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
A quick thought on fineness of control. It is true that 127 levels
tends to "zipper". However, 127 levels is more than enough for static
levels.
I disagree. I never heard zipper noise, when I fade in
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
I can see that dealing with controller data has some way to go.
the problems with controllers come from the almost absurdly varied ways that h/w
manufacturers have chosen to use them.
Yes, I have
On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 09:45 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> A quick thought on fineness of control. It is true that 127 levels
> tends to "zipper". However, 127 levels is more than enough for static
> levels.
I disagree. I never heard zipper noise, when I fade in or out or when
using MIDI panning. Usual
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> The JACK MIDI API delivers and acccepts normalized MIDI data ONLY.
>>
>> No running status. No "clever" merging or filtering. Bytes in... bytes
>> out.
>>
>
> That makes perfect sense. That way the app
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Paul Davis wrote:
The JACK MIDI API delivers and acccepts normalized MIDI data ONLY.
No running status. No "clever" merging or filtering. Bytes in... bytes out.
That makes perfect sense. That way the application designer can expect all
MIDI events to be the same way. How
The JACK MIDI API delivers and acccepts normalized MIDI data ONLY.
No running status. No "clever" merging or filtering. Bytes in... bytes out.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linu
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Tim E. Real wrote:
Pitch bend, which the mackie faders use, is specified in the MIDI standard
and in the MCP spec as: Ex yy zz in one event.
Correct.
Pitch bend is the only truly 14-bit encapsulated message.
There is also one more, real time Song Position Pointer (F2, LSB,
On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 16:09 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 09:30:51AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > > All computers do that. Just put a DI-box with ground lift between your
> > > audio interface and the speakers and the noise is gone.
> > >
> > > Dennis
> >
> > And ge
> On Aug 16, 2014, at 12:09, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Whether it will reduce interference from MIDI in a sound
> card is questionable. MIDI is isolated anyway. If anything
> of it leaks into the analog audio path that means the sound
> card has a problem.
DIN MIDI is isolated, but more and more
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 18:01:12 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> A DI-box with transformers galvanically isolates
Absolutely. That's why I said put a DI-box in between.
>
> Isn't the digital noise audible regarding to electric smog inside the
> computer?
My experience is that the noise comes from the
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 09:30:51AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > All computers do that. Just put a DI-box with ground lift between your
> > audio interface and the speakers and the noise is gone.
> >
> > Dennis
>
> And get someone electrocuted. That doesn't happen on my watch because
> they'll
A DI-box with transformers galvanically isolates, but I won't discuss
ground loops and ground lifts.
Isn't the digital noise audible regarding to electric smog inside the
computer?
Hm? By a short test I couldn't hear the digital noise from an ADA8000
output (but mains hum and/or a ground loop is
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:30:51 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> And get someone electrocuted. That doesn't happen on my watch because
> they'll never get it plugged in, I would not allow it. There are several
> ways to fix a noise inducing ground loop, but a ground lift adapter is not
> one of them
On Saturday 16 August 2014 06:49:59 Dennis Schulmeister did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:32:06 +0200
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > there always is loud
> > audible digital noise what ever slot I use. I experience/d the same
> > with my TerraTec PCI cards on this machine and wi
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:32:06 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> there always is loud
> audible digital noise what ever slot I use. I experience/d the same with
> my TerraTec PCI cards on this machine and with my old mobo.
All computers do that. Just put a DI-box with ground lift between your
audio inte
On Sat, 2014-08-16 at 03:00 -0400, Tim E. Real wrote:
> One can use the pitch wheel for something other than pitch.
> It is per-channel. You can have up to 16 14-bit pitch wheels
> (or knobs/sliders/etc), per interface, each routed to whatever you
> want.
>
> You would just have to reserve some
On August 15, 2014 05:24:51 PM Len Ovens wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
> > Is it just me? Has anyone else looked at pitch bend events on the
> > Ardour MIDI Tracer? Quick test:
> >
> > ===
26 matches
Mail list logo
