On Thursday 26 November 2009 1:24 am, Folderol wrote:
> Once it has this information it can tell the slave to do any of the
> following:
> perform general initialisation and set all defaults (panic!)
> change textual name to '?'
> set bit depth -> 8, 16, 24, ? (defa
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:44:51 +0100
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 01:24 +, Folderol wrote:
> > It's late, but I can't sleep, so...
>
> > set sample rate -> 44.1, 48, 96, ? (default 48)
>
> > If anyone can see any obvious holes in this or simplification
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 01:24 +, Folderol wrote:
> It's late, but I can't sleep, so...
> set sample rate -> 44.1, 48, 96, ? (default 48)
> If anyone can see any obvious holes in this or simplifications please
> say so.
Crystals controlling inexpensive DAC'c and ADC's will
It's late, but I can't sleep, so...
Refining my protocol thoughts, which I originally posted on LAU.
There is one master, which would probably be the computer, but I can
envisage a situation where there could be more than one computer and
only one of them would be the master, the other would be a
>
> And how many of them are open standards?
>
>
> Flo
The only "usefull" would be AES50-2005 because it is royalty-free.
([..] SuperMAC provides 48 channels bi-directionally over Cat 5 cable,
while HyperMAC provides up to 384 channels bi-directionally over Cat 5 or Cat 6
or fibre.
The signal f
Wow! A lot been said since I opened my mouth :o
First an apology!
When I started this thread I CC'd LAU hoping to just bring interested
people over. I didn't expect the cross-post deluge that followed -
Sorry. I won't do it again :(
For those in doubt the original discussion started over on LAU
Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
>> Yes, there is an overview over protocols here:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_over_Ethernet
> Seems like the latter reference is quite far ahead of the IEEE
> thoughts.
And how many of them are open standards?
Flo
--
Machines can do the work, so people have tim
Hmm..this is definitely interesting. When specs and schematics are up, if
the hardware is within my budget, I'll most certainly be testing the idea.
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/
Fons!
>> In the broadcast/studio segment, transport over ethernet is already in
>> use by some manufacturers.
> In the segment of large fixed audio installations (airports,
> train stations, cruise ships, etc.) things like Cobranet have
> been in use for many years - the savings in wiring costs a
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:26:04AM +0100, Florian Faber wrote:
> > I wonder why no company took up this idea already, it seems so sleek and
> > logical. (Almost) every computer has ethernet and the ethernet standard
> > is (in my experience) problem free...
>
> A lot of companies are working on
Florian Faber wrote:
> Atte André Jensen wrote:
>
>
>> I wonder why no company took up this idea already, it seems so sleek and
>> logical. (Almost) every computer has ethernet and the ethernet standard
>> is (in my experience) problem free...
>>
>
> A lot of companies are working on this
Atte André Jensen wrote:
> I wonder why no company took up this idea already, it seems so sleek and
> logical. (Almost) every computer has ethernet and the ethernet standard
> is (in my experience) problem free...
A lot of companies are working on this, but for anything but a simple
audio in/au
12 matches
Mail list logo
