Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On 2010.07.27. 9:50, Mike Cookson wrote: I just read this question, processing tons of collected mails from all three lists. Sorry for naivety or that I am trying to be cute, but in this case host should be unable also to output sound from LV2 plugins. IMHO, any plugin, being a part of some ho

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

I just read this question, processing tons of collected mails from all three lists. Sorry for naivety or that I am trying to be cute, but in this case host should be unable also to output sound from LV2 plugins. IMHO, any plugin, being a part of some host, can only give it data and receive them

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

> > > Adrian, thanks! > > Well, typically, on Windows where a sequencer is an IME (Integrated Music > Environment) you would choose different quality settings of rendering and > that would define how fast it is. Sometimes it might be slower, sometimes > faster. > > > > ps: LMMS has that too -- L

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:14:31PM +0400, Louigi Verona wrote: > > > at this point I'd like to get an expert explanation of what is slower > than > > real time and faster than real time. I don't know what it means %) > > Put simply: if you hav

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:14:31PM +0400, Louigi Verona wrote: > at this point I'd like to get an expert explanation of what is slower than > real time and faster than real time. I don't know what it means %) Put simply: if you have a 3mins song and rendering it to a file takes exactly 3mins, the

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:10 PM, drew Roberts wrote: > On Friday 18 June 2010 08:55:16 Louigi Verona wrote: > > And this type of music > > requires non-real time work rather than real time. At least when it > > concerns final rendering. > > But in the case you are speaking of, slower than real ti

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Friday 18 June 2010 08:55:16 Louigi Verona wrote: > And this type of music > requires non-real time work rather than real time. At least when it > concerns final rendering. But in the case you are speaking of, slower than real time rather than faster than real time right? Resulting from too m

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

Yes, recording by channeling audio into external app is an option, however it has an inherent flow: if you have lots of synth loaded and playback is not exactly perfect, you will not be able to record the tune without xruns crippling right into the master mix. And so it would mean that you have to

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

Excerpts from Louigi Verona's message of 2010-06-18 12:13:16 +0200: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Ralf Mardorf > wrote: > > > Louigi Verona wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rui Nuno Capela >> rn...@rncbc.org>> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>there's no limitati

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Friday 18 June 2010 06:13:16 Louigi Verona wrote: > No, I mean hitting "Render all song to wav" and have everything in one > file. > > -- > Louigi Verona > http://www.louigiverona.ru/ Perhapsjust use jack and hook it up to a simple stereo recorder? all the best, drew _

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Louigi Verona wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rui Nuno Capela > rn...@rncbc.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>there's no limitation on lv2. >> >>i think you misunderstood something, but any lv2 host has obvious >>acce

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:16:19 +0400, Louigi Verona wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: >> >> there's no limitation on lv2. >> >> i think you misunderstood something, but any lv2 host has obvious access >> to the audio stream produced by _any_ plugin. how could it be oth

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

Louigi Verona wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rui Nuno Capela > wrote: there's no limitation on lv2. i think you misunderstood something, but any lv2 host has obvious access to the audio stream produced by _any_ plugin. how could it be

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > > > there's no limitation on lv2. > > i think you misunderstood something, but any lv2 host has obvious access > to the audio stream produced by _any_ plugin. how could it be otherwise? > > your question seems to pertain on rendering au

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Louigi Verona wrote: > Hello everybody! > > When using an LV2 synth within a sequencer, I was told that the host has no > way to access audio which is produced by the plugin so such a basic thing as > rendering your whole project to wav appears to be impossible. T

Re: [LAD] A question about LV2 audio

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:32:54 +0400, Louigi Verona wrote: > Hello everybody! > > When using an LV2 synth within a sequencer, I was told that the host has no > way to access audio which is produced by the plugin so such a basic thing > as > rendering your whole project to wav appears to be impossib

[LAD] A question about LV2 audio

Hello everybody! When using an LV2 synth within a sequencer, I was told that the host has no way to access audio which is produced by the plugin so such a basic thing as rendering your whole project to wav appears to be impossible. I want to ask if this is true and whether this can somehow be cha