J?rn Nettingsmeier:
>
> this looks like it could provide a simple way of granting fixed-deadline
> tasks appropriate cpu time without effectively handing the machine over.
> i was quite skeptical of lennart's idea of a userspace daemon to do the
> job reliably, but the scheduler should have pretty
[paul, i assume this was meant for the list?]
Paul Davis wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Jörn Nettingsmeier :
>> hi everyone!
>
> this:
>
>> A feature of BFS is that it detects when an application tries to obtain a
>> realtime policy (SCHED_RR or SCHED_FIFO) and the caller does not have the
>> appropriate p
2009/10/22 Jörn Nettingsmeier
> hi everyone!
>
>
> i just came across con kolivas' announcement of the latest release of
> the brain fuck scheduler, http://lwn.net/Articles/357451/ .
>
> in it, he explains the idea behind isochronous scheduling (which lennart
> brought up when announcing his real
hi everyone!
i just came across con kolivas' announcement of the latest release of
the brain fuck scheduler, http://lwn.net/Articles/357451/ .
in it, he explains the idea behind isochronous scheduling (which lennart
brought up when announcing his realtime kit):
> Isochronous scheduling.
>
> Is
