On 06/08/2010 12:10 AM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
quantisation noise, making the latter irrelevant. If your A/D
converter is 24 bit, then analog noise will always dominate,
so again quantisation noise is irrelevant.
IMO, the important part is that practically none of the modern
converters,
On 06/07/2010 11:41 PM, Philipp wrote:
My guess is that quantisation noise is only something present between
the input signal and its digital representation, and hence no change of
the digital representations can do anything about it.
It also applies always when the change in digital
Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-06-08 12:08:27 +0200:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:53:43AM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
So the actual problem isn't the noise but its correlation with the signal?
Yes.
I'm a bit curious about the first graph. The actual signal is the ~1kHz
one,
Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-06-07 23:10:27 +0200:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:41:07PM +0200, Philipp wrote:
This is probably a stupid question.
Not stupid, but maybe worded in a way that makes
answering it quite impossible.
You managed anyway, thanks ;)
My guess is that
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:53:43AM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
So the actual problem isn't the noise but its correlation with the signal?
Yes.
I'm a bit curious about the first graph. The actual signal is the ~1kHz
one, but what are all the other 'spikes'?
The quantisation error
This is probably a stupid question.
My guess is that quantisation noise is only something present between
the input signal and its digital representation, and hence no change of
the digital representations can do anything about it.
--
Regards,
Philipp
--
Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:41:07PM +0200, Philipp wrote:
This is probably a stupid question.
Not stupid, but maybe worded in a way that makes
answering it quite impossible.
My guess is that quantisation noise is only something present between
the input signal and its digital representation,