On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Steve Harrisst...@plugin.org.uk wrote:
An update.
I've been contacted by the company that sells this software, asking
for retrospective permission, or something along those lines.
I'm not going to grant it - I don't really think I can, the SWH
plugins
An update.
I've been contacted by the company that sells this software, asking
for retrospective permission, or something along those lines.
I'm not going to grant it - I don't really think I can, the SWH
plugins represent the work of far too many people for me to feel
comfortable doing
Hallo,
Steve Harris hat gesagt: // Steve Harris wrote:
Consensus seems to be that they need to distribute code for the
plugins they include, but whether they are allowed to ship the plugins
is another question.
The crazy thing is that if they shipped their host in one package, and
Quoting Steve Harris st...@plugin.org.uk:
An update.
I've been contacted by the company that sells this software, asking
for retrospective permission, or something along those lines.
Hi,
I wonder if we have received the same email? The email I got did not
mention any specific license or
On 5 Aug 2009, at 11:49, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
Quoting Steve Harris st...@plugin.org.uk:
An update.
I've been contacted by the company that sells this software, asking
for retrospective permission, or something along those lines.
Hi,
I wonder if we have received the same email? The
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 10:02 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Consensus seems to be that they need to distribute code for the
plugins they include, but whether they are allowed to ship the plugins
is another question.
The crazy thing is that if they shipped their host in one package, and
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Sampo Savolainenv...@iki.fi wrote:
Quoting Steve Harris st...@plugin.org.uk:
An update.
I've been contacted by the company that sells this software, asking
for retrospective permission, or something along those lines.
I wonder if we have received the same
2009/8/5 Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org:
Quotint the GPL-FAQ. However applied to LADSPA this would mean, that
GPL-plug-ins are not allowed in commercial software *at all*,
That's been *my* understanding of the GPL too:
It just doesn't want GPL'd software to be used by proprietary software
in
