Re: [LAD] IR: Lv2 reverb (without the GUI..?)

2011-09-02 Thread harryhaaren
On , David Robillard wrote: The (truly awful) hash thing can and should be replaced with the use of the newish persist and files extensions immediately. Fair enough. I've not yet "host-supported" either of those yet, so that's on the todo list now :) Thanks for the info, -Harry

Re: [LAD] IR: Lv2 reverb (without the GUI..?)

2011-09-02 Thread David Robillard
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:50 +0100, Harry van Haaren wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm faced with a problem that I can't see an easy way around regarding > the use of the IR reverb plugin. > > I'm running the GUI in a seperate *process*, and doing all lv2 > communication over OSC. For the most part this i

[LAD] IR: Lv2 reverb (without the GUI..?)

2011-09-02 Thread Harry van Haaren
Hey All, I'm faced with a problem that I can't see an easy way around regarding the use of the IR reverb plugin. I'm running the GUI in a seperate *process*, and doing all lv2 communication over OSC. For the most part this is easy, the problem rears its head when one want's to use a plugin whose