Re: [LAD] On LAD (WAS: Re: [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb)

2011-02-23 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
Unless you're interested on somewhat more 'user-oriented' reflections triggered by David's long-winded rant... :) also skip. Not a real developer here, so some reflections from a more user-oriented point of view maybe. Excerpts from David Robillard's message: Maybe not true with blinders on,

Re: [LAD] On LAD (WAS: Re: [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb)

2011-02-23 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 2/23/11, David Robillard wrote: > Lignux will never replace OSX as The music production platform until our > plugin technology is at least as capable. That makes it sound as if plug-ins were the only obstacle :) You probably didn't intend to mean it :) Also, the notion of replacing Mac with L

[LAD] On LAD (WAS: Re: [OT] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb)

2011-02-22 Thread David Robillard
Unless you're interested in a long-winded rant mostly about me and my perspective on LAD in general, skip this one. Otherwise, here goes: On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 22:31 +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote: > Excerpts from David Robillard's message of 2011-02-22 22:12:56 +0100: > > --snip-- > > > Put si