Hi,
We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
Our product (Receptor) is used in live situations by non-programmers, so
the support can't be "tweaky
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
it works. its development seems to be an i
Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
>> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
>> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
>
> it works. its
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
> Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
>>> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
>>> ea
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:15:33AM -0800, Michael Ost wrote:
> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
>
> Our product (Receptor) is used in l
Le 12 janv. 2010 à 19:38, Paul Davis a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
>> Paul Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost
>>> wrote:
Hi,
We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
Windows/Ma
Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
>> Paul Davis wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost
>>> wrote:
Hi,
We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality,
> case. OTOH, stephane does have a trick in jack2 whereby you can make
> the app *become* the server, and then run the app, so to speak, as an
> internal client, so that there is no IPC overhead at all. i don't know
> if this works in windows.
Well the "trick" in question is that the code using th
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Stéphane Letz wrote:
>
> Le 12 janv. 2010 à 19:38, Paul Davis a écrit :
>> I don't think that is true, but its not clear that you want your
>> product based on a server/client model anyway. The windows
>> installation seems to work quite well, but it requires an
>
On 01/12/2010 07:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
PortAudio on Linux is very reliable in my experience. It's
Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 07:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
>> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
>> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
>
> PortAudio on Linux is ve
Michael Ost:
>
> Paul Davis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
>>> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
>>> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in L
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:20:31 +0100 (CET)
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" wrote:
>
> Michael Ost:
> >
> > Paul Davis wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
> >>> Windows/Mac as well). What's
The only issue I currently have with PortAudio is that it does not
work very well with pulseaudio. It seems to have problems using the
alsa-plugin mechanism. I have mentioned this on the portaudio list,
but none of the developers responded, only a couple of other users
said they had similar
14 matches
Mail list logo