Hi there,
I could use some advise.
You may or may not heard of replaygain. It's reasonably widely used in
consumer audio, but sometimes I wish it was available for video as well.
By this I mean I wish it was available for the audio part of the video.
Well, I need a programming project for a unive
On 12/09/11 21:20, Philipp wrote:
Hi!
> Well, I need a programming project for a university course and this is
> just one of my ideas that I want to propose to my teacher and
> prospective teammates. In order to do this I'd like to narrow it down a
> bit further and especially want to find out wh
On 12/09/2011 09:20 PM, Philipp wrote:
Question 1: Is there anything better than replaygain that should be used
instead?
not better as such, but carrying more weight, for sure: the EBU R128
recommendation. fons has presented an implementation at lac 2011:
http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2011/pape
Excerpts from Adrian Knoth's message of 2011-12-10 11:38:03 +0100:
> On 12/09/11 21:20, Philipp wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Well, I need a programming project for a university course and this is
> > just one of my ideas that I want to propose to my teacher and
> > prospective teammates. In order to do t
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> >2. Players like VLC have a normalize function. I don't know if it's
> > one-pass (on the fly, more like automated gain control) or two-pass,
> > but it basically solves your problem of audio levels at playback
>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:01:54PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Huh? I cannot find anything on this website that says "normalization is
> not sufficient":
Depends on what is normalised. Peak level has no relation to
loudness, so peak normalisation doesn't help. RMS comes as lot
closer, RMS after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hoi Philipp,
On 12/09/2011 09:20 PM, Philipp wrote:
> Hi there,
> I could use some advise.
>
> You may or may not heard of replaygain. It's reasonably widely used in
> consumer audio, but sometimes I wish it was available for video as well.
> By this
Excerpts from Adrian Knoth's message of 2011-12-10 15:01:54 +0100:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:10:38PM +0100, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
>
> > >2. Players like VLC have a normalize function. I don't know if it's
> > > one-pass (on the fly, more like automated gain control) or two-pass,
>
Excerpts from Robin Gareus's message of 2011-12-10 15:26:11 +0100:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hoi Philipp,
>
> On 12/09/2011 09:20 PM, Philipp wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I could use some advise.
> >
> > You may or may not heard of replaygain. It's reasonably widely used in
> > consumer audio, but sometimes
On 12/10/2011 11:04 PM, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
[..]
> guess I'd need the whole track anyway before making
> calculations.
Yes, but not all of it at the same time. You can calculate it sequentially.
Have a look at https://www.ohloh.net/p/Samplecat it includes a ffmpeg
audio decoder, max. gain
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
> For comparison, ebur128 reported:
> Loundness-range 19.1 LU; Peak 6.7 LU for the Chaplin movie.
> and
> Loundness-range 11.3 LU; Peak 15.3 LU for the youtube video,
?? ebur128 does not report anything called 'Peak' in LU.
The r
On 12/11/2011 01:19 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
>
>> For comparison, ebur128 reported:
>> Loundness-range 19.1 LU; Peak 6.7 LU for the Chaplin movie.
>> and
>> Loundness-range 11.3 LU; Peak 15.3 LU for the youtube video,
>
> ?? e
Quoting Robin Gareus (2011-12-11 14:27:35)
>On 12/11/2011 01:19 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>
>>> For comparison, ebur128 reported:
>>> Loundness-range 19.1 LU; Peak 6.7 LU for the Chaplin movie.
>>> and
>>> Loundness-range 11.3
13 matches
Mail list logo
