Hi everybody!
I'm interested in wavetable synthesis, so read around a bit on how they
work, best used etc, but I can find preciously little information that
describes how to best "create" a wavetable.
Pre-recorded material seems a pretty go-to choice rather than using csound
or freinds to g
Hello Harry!
It's an interesting topic, which I had been investigating. I do have a
wavetable based hardware synth, but I was thinking about emulating it in
software. Waldorf didn't say a lot about creating one's own wavetables. You
might just as well try csound - or one of its accompanying p
My intention is indeed to do "waldorf style" cascaded wavetables which are
interpolated between. I have a program that I can use to test the
wavetables, but the issue of tuning remains a problem for me.
Example:
I record a C3 note, 10 seconds of it. Then I want to create a wavetable.
Search
Hey Harry!
I have a feeling, that you should go with just one cycle of your waveform.
So you would need a wavetable oscillator to load your waveform for one
position in the full wavetable. That should solve your problems of pitch.
I investigated one way of performing the full wavetable bit i
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:35 PM, wrote:
> Example:
> I record a C3 note, 10 seconds of it. Then I want to create a wavetable.
> Search for a zero crossing after 1 second, chop. Looped playback = C3.
> Now I want to have a C#3, so 1/12 of the double of the frequency, playing
> back at that rate w
On 08/24/2012 10:35 PM, harryhaa...@gmail.com wrote:
> I record a C3 note, 10 seconds of it. Then I want to create a wavetable.
> Search for a zero crossing after 1 second, chop. Looped playback = C3.
> Now I want to have a C#3, so 1/12 of the double of the frequency,
> playing back at that rate wi
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 08:35:29PM +, harryhaa...@gmail.com wrote:
> My intention is indeed to do "waldorf style" cascaded wavetables
> which are interpolated between. I have a program that I can use to
> test the wavetables, but the issue of tuning remains a problem for
> me.
A few things to
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
> Even if you implemented it correctly, overtones or undertones can
> mislead ones perception quite easily.
>
Indeed: I've not taken a spectrum analyzer to the signal yet: but something
feels wierd with it.
Will look at the spectrum and see i
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> The easiest way in the case of wavetable synthesis is to upsample
> your waves by a factor of say 8, then use linear interpolation.
>
So the preparation process is:
-record the sounds
-upsample x8
Live playing:
-downsample the wavetable
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:44:12AM +0100, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>
> > The easiest way in the case of wavetable synthesis is to upsample
> > your waves by a factor of say 8, then use linear interpolation.
> >
>
> So the preparation proce
On 08/24/2012 02:21 PM, harryhaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm interested in wavetable synthesis, so read around a bit on how they
work, best used etc, but I can find preciously little information that
You probably know this, but wavetable synthesis is different from a
table-lookup os
On , Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Basically just multiply all samples indices by 8.
I understand the indice part. Say I have a recorded sample to upsample :
just resample it to a factor 8 with sinc interpolation in eg Audacity?
@Gabriel: Yeah I suppose its a table look-up oscillator that I'm doi
12 matches
Mail list logo
