alex stone wrote:
> And i can see the use case for, as an example, a headless rig running
> a big sampler, i.e., a raw warrior box.
At least I am running headless audio server setups where jackd is
started by startup script along with required server process. Otherwise
system is pretty minimal wit
On Mon, 15.06.09 11:38, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote:
>
> [it'd be nice if you keep all the cc'ed original lists in the thread]
>
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu
[it'd be nice if you keep all the cc'ed original lists in the thread]
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu)
> wrote:
>
> > > Distributions will certainly enable the D-Bus code in JACK if they
> > >
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu)
> wrote:
>
>> > Distributions will certainly enable the D-Bus code in JACK if they
>> > ship it. So, I have no problem with depending on a dbus'ified jack for
>> >
On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote:
> > Distributions will certainly enable the D-Bus code in JACK if they
> > ship it. So, I have no problem with depending on a dbus'ified jack for
> > this logic to work.
>
> >From a packagers' (for Fedora/Planet CCR
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 15.06.09 15:34, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, 15.06.09 11:01, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote:
> >>
> I was just thinking, when jack2 finished initialization it takes a
> name on the session
>
>> What I'm personally trying to achieve is a more "flexible" way
>> (compared
>> to what is currently a bit hard-coded in JAKC2 SVN) so that a DBus
>> control component can be coded as a "plugin" to be possibly loaded in
>> JACK server process. This new plugin model allows to keep basically 2
On Mon, 15.06.09 15:34, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote:
>> On Mon, 15.06.09 11:01, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote:
>>
I was just thinking, when jack2 finished initialization it takes a
name on the session bus, right?
>>>
>>> Not sure about what you mean by " it takes name on th
Le 15 juin 09 à 14:59, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> On Mon, 15.06.09 11:01, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote:
>
>>> I was just thinking, when jack2 finished initialization it takes a
>>> name on the session bus, right?
>>
>> Not sure about what you mean by " it takes name on the session
>>
On Mon, 15.06.09 11:01, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote:
> > I was just thinking, when jack2 finished initialization it takes a
> > name on the session bus, right?
>
> Not sure about what you mean by " it takes name on the session bus". I
> hope Nedko can answer better here.
I simply mean
Le 15 juin 09 à 01:14, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> Hmm,
>
> I was just thinking, when jack2 finished initialization it takes a
> name on the session bus, right?
Not sure about what you mean by " it takes name on the session bus". I
hope Nedko can answer better here.
What is implemented rig
11 matches
Mail list logo
