Actually, thinking about what I do in real life (to whatever extent a
professor is involved with real life :) ) -- mobile robots -- it seems
like there's a real need for a network protocol doing low latency,
timestamped data over unreliable transports. Audio is an example
application, so is robot
"Richard C. Burnett" wrote:
>
> I would think there would have to be moving parts of some sort, like the
> plastic itself, since sound is created through disturbances in the air (or
> any transmission medium). I wonder what kind of distortion they are going
> to get with bass frequencies. I thi
douglas irving repetto wrote:
> okay, i'll just go ahead and set up [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> if it takes off, that's great, if not it only cost me a few minutes of
> my time.
>
> jorn, would you like to be the maintainer of LAU too?
I'm pleased to see the response to this idea. Alas, I didn't consul
I may have picked up a virus, please do not open any recent attachments
from my address. Thanks,
Emmanuel
---
'It's easy to procrastinate and leave good deeds undone, but such a course
will bring regrets when life's short race is run'
-Anon
douglas irving repetto wrote:
>
> Paul Winkler wrote:
>
> > BTW, if someone (jorn & douglas?) gets this started, can we
> > please have it archived somewhere from day 1? Might as well get
> > it right from the beginning.
>
> okay, i'll just go ahead and set up [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> if it takes of
Paul Winkler wrote:
>
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > I think, that a linux audio user list (LAU?) would be the most important
> > next step. Unfortunatly linux-audio-using still means, that one has to be
> > familiar with too much development issues. The reason is obvious: a lot of
> > the interest
Yeah, just a little typo.
--- Darwin Marcus Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2001 17:35, you wrote:
> > I'm running low latency with suse linux 7.1 and
> the
> > 2.1.18 kernel, and its nice, I can use terminatorX
> > with full scrtahcing on a puny 233mghz machine.
> >
>
> Wha
