Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
My suggestion: LAD - Linux Audio Developers SPA - Simple Plugin Api LAP - Linux Audio Patchbay LADIES - Linux Audio Developers Intuitive Editing Suite How many self respecting long haired hippy muso's won't appreciate those four words? -- Patrick Shirkey - Manager Boost Hardware. Importing

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA app client question

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Davis
Maarten had written an FLTK client for LAAGA: >> >It is a very simple example, it's your ae_client.c with a slider to control >> >the gain. >> >> I just added it to the laaga source base. It seems to work flawlessly >> here. So I suspect some library issues, or something like that. > >Very stran

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Davis
>On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Ellis Breen wrote: > >> Another couple of questions regarding LAAGA.Would this allow softsynths to >> be synchronised with audio to sample accuracy? And how would one go about >> bouncing their output to a hard disk recorder such as Ardour? What tools are

[linux-audio-dev] linux-kernel info: 2.4 Performance bug in read ahead

2001-07-27 Thread Roger Larsson
Hi, I have for some time wondered why reading two big (and identical) files takes the double time of comparing them... today I found the cause :-) Linux limits the read ahead to 1+31 pages (á 4096 bytes = 128 kB) with modern HD this is read quickly (4.3 ms, with 30 MB/s) then the head has to mo

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Davis
>> I was wondering whether it was possible to implement LADSPA on non-Linux >> OSes, and if so, whether it has been done? For example, without breaking any >> licenses (by clever dynamic linking if necessary) could a DirectX, VST, MAS >> or TDM wrapper/adapter be written for it (if any of these pr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Davis
On the subject of: >> JACK - Jack Audio Connection Kit. Rick writes: >Hehe, I can see it know 'You haven't used pro-audio tools on linux, well >let me tell you buddy, you don't know JACK :) this is so good, so very, very good it almost makes me want to run: sed -e 's/laaga/jack/g' -e 's/

[linux-audio-dev] Cross application ladspa settings

2001-07-27 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > It's important to also save mulitple plugins. Save the order of a chain. > And some programs also support networks where the plugin's aren't > necessarily connected in a linear a->b->c manner. Maybe > $LADSPA_PATH/networks/? This might not be practic

Re: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
Sébastien Métrot wrote: > Isn't it exactely the job of the main X Desktop providers to reach an > agreement about where such specs should be placed in the users directory and > what format it should be? (I'm becoming a big fan of xml for such kind of > settings files but wahtever will do as long

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Richard C. Burnett
Hehe, I can see it know 'You haven't used pro-audio tools on linux, well let me tell you buddy, you don't know JACK :) Rick On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] Sébastien Métrot wrote: > JACK - Jack Audio Connection Kit. > > Just wait till version 6.35 :-) > > Sebastien > > - Original Mes

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re:User Interface -> An idea about presets for ladspa plugins

2001-07-27 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Linium wrote: > One cruel thing is that there is no inter-applications presets system for the > ladspa plugins. > > Presets are quite usefull for all sort of reasons: > -They are nice starting points for further tweakings. > -It's immediate, you don't want to adjust all the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] Sébastien Métrot wrote: > > However, some might see it a bit rude to take their Linux plugins and > > compile them for Windows and because of this I've not encouraged spread to > > other platforms. What do folk think? I wouldn't mind for my CMT plugins. > > > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Sébastien Métrot
Isn't it exactely the job of the main X Desktop providers to reach an agreement about where such specs should be placed in the users directory and what format it should be? (I'm becoming a big fan of xml for such kind of settings files but wahtever will do as long as it's a standard that every one

Re: [linux-audio-dev] modifiers was - what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
Look this may have got out-of-hand (it was meant to be an illustration of a point rather than a Very Important Thing). >> so why don't we use the key as the copy/cut/paste modifier? > > What's wrong with C-w, M-w and C-y? ;-). the same argument about stretching applies (at least on the kbds I

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread ccb
> so why don't we use the key as the copy/cut/paste modifier? What's wrong with C-w, M-w and C-y? ;-). ccb -- Charles C. Bennett, Jr. VA LiNUX Systems Systems Engineer, Northeast US 25 Burlington Mall Rd., Suite 300 +1 617 543-6513 Burlingt

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
Yo Steve ... it *is* hot isn't it? On Fri, Jul 27, 2001, Steve Harris wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 07:29:00PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> Why don't I like the -{x,c,v} keys on Linux & M$ - is it because they >> are 'different' from the -{x,c,v} on MacOS? >> >> Nope. It's because the key (

Re: [linux-audio-dev] FW: Kudos to the CoreAudio team

2001-07-27 Thread Karl MacMillan
On Friday 27 July 2001 14:07, you wrote: > This was just posted on the OS-X core audio list > > Kudos to who ? > > > I just came across a paper detailing audio latency on various desktop > > operating > > systems. MacOS X was second best without load and the best performing > > system > > wit

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Sébastien Métrot
- Original Message - From: "Richard W.E. Furse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:19 PM Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA > > However, some might see it a bit rude to take their Linux plugins and > compile them for Windows and becau

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Richard Dobson
Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > Taybin wrote: > > >But that menu would be rearranging, so it would be slower to use it. Now, > >I would suggest connecting the redo, or some "do again" command to the > >last action taken. The user always knows what he did, and always knows > >where the "do again" co

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 07:29:00PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Why don't I like the -{x,c,v} keys on Linux & M$ - is it because they > are 'different' from the -{x,c,v} on MacOS? > > Nope. It's because the key (placed where the key is on a PC > keyboard) is less of a stretch for one-handed ope

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 07:19:20PM +0100, Richard W.E. Furse wrote: > However, some might see it a bit rude to take their Linux plugins and > compile them for Windows and because of this I've not encouraged spread to > other platforms. What do folk think? I wouldn't mind for my CMT plugins. Fine

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001, Steve Harris wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:08:12PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> order. [Iain rates the probability approx. = 0.5 * sqrt(bugger all) ] > > Possibly a bit of a high estimate ;) > >> an Audio HIG? > > I would be nice, but even getting people to agree on

[linux-audio-dev] Re:User Interface -> An idea about presets for ladspa plugins

2001-07-27 Thread Linium
Le Fri, 27 Jul 2001, vous avez écrit : > Yup, that seems to be a part audacity needs to be extended - ladspa > support is quite important these days. Hello, I would like to take the occasion to talk about something I feel is needed. One cruel thing is that there is no inter-applications presets

[linux-audio-dev] FW: Kudos to the CoreAudio team

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
This was just posted on the OS-X core audio list Kudos to who ? > I just came across a paper detailing audio latency on various desktop > operating > systems. MacOS X was second best without load and the best performing > system > with load. 2.83 ms under load is very impressive. The link i

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Richard W.E. Furse
A few people have got LADSPA support working on Windows already. After all, it's all ANSI C except for the dlopen() mechanism which can be replaced trivially with the DLL mechanism. The suggestion to drop the L has been made, but I think it should stay. However, some might see it a bit rude to ta

[linux-audio-dev] FW: Kudos to the CoreAudio team

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
This was just posted on the OS-X core audio list Kudos to who ? > I just came across a paper detailing audio latency on various desktop > operating > systems. MacOS X was second best without load and the best performing > system > with load. 2.83 ms under load is very impressive. The link i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
> JACK - Jack Audio Connection Kit. > > Just wait till version 6.35 :-) and thus Jack the LAD sorry - it *is* hot in the UK (as Steve says it gets to us) ... ;- Iain.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Kevin Conder
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Steve Harris wrote: > > > > Alba, Audio Linking By Alba > > My vote is for "ALBA" (Audio Linking by Alba) > -- > Abramo Bagnara > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think ALBA sounds too much like ALSA and would cause confusion. === Kevin Conder

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Sébastien Métrot
JACK - Jack Audio Connection Kit. Just wait till version 6.35 :-) Sebastien - Original Message - From: "Paul Winkler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name > Steve Harris wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 2

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Karl MacMillan
On Friday 27 July 2001 11:37, you wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Ellis Breen wrote: > > I was wondering whether it was possible to implement LADSPA on non-Linux > > OSes, and if so, whether it has been done? For example, without breaking > > any licenses (by clever dynamic link

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
>British humour tends to be very dry, but I don't think much of it gets >exported, when it is, its usually misunderstood (I should know). It is proper that one should refrain from talking of which cultures of our world don't quite un_der_stand. -- Patrick Shirkey - Manager Boost Hardware. Im

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Taybin wrote: >But that menu would be rearranging, so it would be slower to use it. Now, >I would suggest connecting the redo, or some "do again" command to the >last action taken. The user always knows what he did, and always knows >where the "do again" command is located. This would be most

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread delire
- Original Message - From: "Taybin Rutkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 27 July 2001 10:51 Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame > On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > > > > > I beli

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread delire
- Original Message - From: "Paul Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 27 July 2001 10:57 Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface jesus man you're hilarious ; ) >When its easy, I get a nice warm feeling all over. When its > difficult, I end up being

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Sébastien Métrot
> British humour tends to be very dry, but I don't think much of it gets > exported, when it is, its usually misunderstood (I should know). > > - Steve > Which doesn't prevent it to be funny anyway :-))) Sebastien (some french guy ;-)

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Winkler
Steve Harris wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 06:24:30PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Richard C. Burnett wrote: > > > > > Not Another Wire (NAW) :) (Hook your DAW with NAW) > > > > YAAF (BBTM) > > Yet Another Audio Framework (But Better Than Most) > > Yard, Yet Anther R

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: ALBA

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:42:48AM -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: > Greetings: > > Someone mentioned that 'alba' is Italian for 'dawn'. Just FYI, the > alba (or aubade) was a troubadour or trouvere song form used by a > look-out to awaken lovers before the dawn, i.e., before their spouses > could

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Winkler
Richard Guenther wrote: > Well, people dont stop development on their apps they worked on for > one and a half year - this will not happen. I think it does happen... AFAICT, Boris Nagels disappeared off the 'net sometime after promising to open-source Multitrack, but before actually doing so. You

[linux-audio-dev] Re: ALBA

2001-07-27 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: Someone mentioned that 'alba' is Italian for 'dawn'. Just FYI, the alba (or aubade) was a troubadour or trouvere song form used by a look-out to awaken lovers before the dawn, i.e., before their spouses could figure out what they were up to. Ah, the Middle Ages, how I miss 'em... Be

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Alexander Ehlert
Hi, > I would like to add that I feel it is the ideas that are more important > than the individual apps. Each one has different strong points. Things > progress so much faster with the sound editors if we combined these > ideas. Yeah thats it and sometimes two different philosophies can't be ju

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Richard Guenther wrote: > > > > Well, people dont stop development on their apps they worked on for > > one and a half year - this will not happen. > > > > Both you and Paul feel the same way on that topic. I don't hold it > against you either. > >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Paul Davis wrote: > I would point out here that snd has had the same kind of capabilities > as the GIMP in the realm of audio for many years now. One might argue > even more power, given that it uses Guile for the scripting language. > > Yet nobody (well, OK, very few people

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Ellis Breen wrote: > I was wondering whether it was possible to implement LADSPA on non-Linux > OSes, and if so, whether it has been done? For example, without breaking any > licenses (by clever dynamic linking if necessary) could a DirectX, VST, MAS > or

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 08:28:37AM -0600, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >Proper British humour about wideboys, cortinas and posers, now that makes >more sense. > > I was always told ``British humour'' was an oxymoron :) Naah, you were thinking of american ;) British humour tends to be very dry, b

[linux-audio-dev] Wrappers and LAAGA

2001-07-27 Thread Ellis Breen
I was wondering whether it was possible to implement LADSPA on non-Linux OSes, and if so, whether it has been done? For example, without breaking any licenses (by clever dynamic linking if necessary) could a DirectX, VST, MAS or TDM wrapper/adapter be written for it (if any of these provide a supe

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
> Err, (Paul) Newmann's Own Salad Dressing? Now I'm confused, why does Paul Newmann have salad dressing. Isn't he an actor? He put a bunch of his money into a salad dressing company; the profits all go to the Scott Newmann foundation (in memory of his son, who died very young -- I think

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 08:57:01AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > Now, if someone produced a library that supported playlist editing in > C in a way that could be easily integrated into (1) other languages > (2) programs with different goals, there would be chance at > "cooperation", since we'd stand

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Dave Phillips
Paul Davis wrote: > ...snd has had the same kind of capabilities > as the GIMP in the realm of audio for many years now. One might argue > even more power, given that it uses Guile for the scripting language. > > Yet nobody (well, OK, very few people) have jumped into snd and done > all kinds of

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:08:12PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote: > order. [Iain rates the probability approx. = 0.5 * sqrt(bugger all) ] Possibly a bit of a high estimate ;) > an Audio HIG? I would be nice, but even getting people to agree on simple things, is hard in the UNIX world. eg. what the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
Richard Dobson wrote: >[lots of reasonable stuff snipped...] > 'Intuitive' is a wonderfully useless (and much abused) (non-)technical > term, as it invariably means different things to different people, > because, strangely enough, people learn to wotk (and think) in different > ways. Nothing i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 08:46:41AM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Paul Davis wrote: > > > >> POSA > > >> Paul's Own Sound Architecture > > > > > >now *that* made me laugh ... > > > > true, but i wonder if taybin has any idea of quite why, since i think > > i do (given your un

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 09:12:53PM +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > >Steve Harris wrote: > >> > >> Alba, Audio Linking By Alba > > >Wow!!! This is wonderful. > > >"Alba" is the italian word for "dawn". It seems good wishing Wow, I though it was italian for White,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > > > I believe that studies have been done with dynamic menus. They found that > > it was confusing to have the menus rearrange. Humans get used to looking > > for the same thing in one place, and if the

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Davis
>The library of useful ideas for each project are reasonably sized but >nothing as extensive as the code base for win or mac editors. But if we >had combined them all from the start then we would already have a very >strong editing suite. How unrealistic is it? Is that posibility just too >fantast

RE: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Richard C. Burnett wrote: > The next best alternative is code that statistacally keeps track of how > often commands etc are used, then its sent back so people can see what the > most frequent operations are and how they distribute between different > users. Seems uncomforta

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Paul Davis wrote: > >> POSA > >> Paul's Own Sound Architecture > > > >now *that* made me laugh ... > > true, but i wonder if taybin has any idea of quite why, since i think > i do (given your understanding of the cortina mk.III situation) ... Err, (Paul) Newmann's Own Salad

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Paul Davis
>I would like to add that I feel it is the ideas that are more important >than the individual apps. Each one has different strong points. Things >progress so much faster with the sound editors if we combined these >ideas. > >That is where the true value of the Gimp lies. It's not the useful gui >d

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Abramo Bagnara wrote: >Steve Harris wrote: >> >> Alba, Audio Linking By Alba >Wow!!! This is wonderful. >"Alba" is the italian word for "dawn". It seems good wishing >My vote is for "ALBA" (Audio Linking by Alba) Isn't also a quote from Napoleon? Also I think you are biased because it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Richard Dobson
Well, nobody can ever win these arguments; I find the new Start menu system very convenient and intuitive, as I do indeed use 15% of my installed programs 99% of the time. Win2k Startmenu doesn't move menu items to different places (though it enables you to do that if you want), it just hides rar

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Richard Guenther wrote: > > Well, people dont stop development on their apps they worked on for > one and a half year - this will not happen. > Both you and Paul feel the same way on that topic. I don't hold it against you either. I would like to add that I feel it is the ideas that are more im

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Abramo Bagnara
Steve Harris wrote: > > Alba, Audio Linking By Alba Wow!!! This is wonderful. "Alba" is the italian word for "dawn". It seems good wishing My vote is for "ALBA" (Audio Linking by Alba) -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Opera Unica Phon

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
> User interfaces need to be intuitive. #1 priority - preferably with: the main (if not all) tasks right in front of you. well-designed icons that lead you to the task directly. > For linux > applications it is better to satisfy the 90 > percentile. Bells and whistles should be left to > profe

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Kevin Hremeviuc
Hi all, --- Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 04:54:09AM +0900, Patrick > Shirkey wrote: > > Richard Dobson said: > > > > >and, wherever possible, ensure that the most > frequently performed tasks > > >(which may be the most argued-over parameter, of > course) r

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Frank Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why change? Personally I like LAAGA. But maybe that's for being > dutch, and used to the double-A. I agree here - personally I don't see a need in changing the name again. Sure, there are more "sexy" names (like "FreeWire" is) that we could use, but the basic prob

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 06:24:30PM -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Richard C. Burnett wrote: > > > Not Another Wire (NAW) :) (Hook your DAW with NAW) > > YAAF (BBTM) > Yet Another Audio Framework (But Better Than Most) Yard, Yet Anther Rewire Duplicate ;) Plug, Plug Links Us

Re: [linux-audio-dev] documentation

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:17:30AM +0100, Richard Dobson wrote: > I have one example where I would really like to have an answer: having > installed Mandrake 7.2 (replacing an old but pleasant Redhat 6), I have > the problem that in the terminal (under KDE), different file types are > now colour-c

Re: [linux-audio-dev] what's wrong with glame

2001-07-27 Thread Steve Harris
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 04:54:09AM +0900, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > Richard Dobson said: > > >and, wherever possible, ensure that the most frequently performed tasks > >(which may be the most argued-over parameter, of course) require the > >least number of steps. A sub-menu requires at least fou

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Vincent Touquet
Ok, apalogies are in place here, this is way offtopic. I intended to send this to Nick only, but I failed : Sincere apaologies, Vincent

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > My reason is that there are so many editors to chose from I can only > really be bothered with contributing to 3 of them seriously. I think for contributing to even 3 is a lot... > Have the Glamers bothered to install ardour yet? What about sweep? O

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 08:37:18AM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote: (cut) >time now. I've even just bought some hardware (a twin K7 1.2GHz with an RME >soundcard amongst other things) to run it on! If it was a "higher-level" library than (cut) Hi, I'm about to buy a new computer too and i was think

Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface

2001-07-27 Thread Nick Bailey
ljp wrote: > 7/26/2001 23:30:38, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Why don't I make my libraries available as RPMs or debian packages? > >Because I have better things to do with my development time than > >rebuilding, reuploading, re-doing a web page every time I fix a bug in > >a libr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA name

2001-07-27 Thread Maarten de Boer
Why change? Personally I like LAAGA. But maybe that's for being dutch, and used to the double-A. mAArten

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA app client question

2001-07-27 Thread Maarten de Boer
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:54:13 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >It is a very simple example, it's your ae_client.c with a slider to control > >the gain. > > I just added it to the laaga source base. It seems to work flawlessly > here. So I suspect some library issues, or something like that. Ver