On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:14:28AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> > CONFIG_MK7=y
> >
> > Did I read correctly that some 3DNow instructions cause latency issues?
>
> That's what Roger Larsson suggested when I showed bad latency results.
> Compiling for 586 solved that problem for me, and I find
just fyi, the linuxdj site has repaired itself last night and i
have finally been able to update the news page.
still no traces of benno however, and my mails remain unanswered.
Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
> sorry for the noise, but has anyone been in contact lately with
> benno senoner ?
>
>
wonderful - thanks!
thats actually one of the approaches we are considering at
the moment :o) - i will let you all know how things are
progressing with the project once we've experimented a bit.
thanks to everyone once again,
miriam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.iriXx.org
Quoting Mark Rages <[EMAI
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:39:23 +0100,
> Maarten de Boer wrote:
> >
> > Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think 2.4.14 or 15pre are ok, too. The same LL patch should work.
> >
> > I applied the 2.4.15pre1AA patch on 2.4.
>Sounds very good. I can provide server space to host the test results,
>and write some CGI to display them. I think the best way is to submit
>them by e-mail, having the test scripts write out an e-mailable
>form. I am not very sure though what to do with the images; are these
>really necesar
CK wrote:
>hmmm ... now I wonder what these things have to do to with each other ??
Nothing like what Juhana is thinking. I only want to provide useful bits
of information in a format that is quick and to the point. You can see
an example at
http://www.boosthardware.com/LAU/Linux_Audio_Users_
Andre Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
>> their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of
>> the several combinations, categorising on:
>
> This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latency
> testing harness s
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
> their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of
> the several combinations, categorising on:
This is a great idea. I actually started re-writing the latenc
I read:
>
> In the interest of promoting Linux Audio Development, can anyone point
> me to a good place to find out how to set up a system that loads adverts
> randomly when a webpage is accessed?
hmmm ... now I wonder what these things have to do to with each other ??
anyway since I guess usin
>From: Patrick Shirkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>In the interest of promoting Linux Audio Development, can anyone point
>me to a good place to find out how to set up a system that loads adverts
>randomly when a webpage is accessed?
How do you plan promoting LAD? Do you mean adverts that brings mone
Well of course :)
Can you also put there a comprehensive mini-howto
about how we should run which test to get these results ?
kind regards
vini
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:26:23AM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
>their latency
In the interest of promoting Linux Audio Development, can anyone point
me to a good place to find out how to set up a system that loads adverts
randomly when a webpage is accessed?
TIA.
--
Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.
Http://www.boosthardware.com - For the discerning hardware connoisse
At Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:39:23 +0100,
Maarten de Boer wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think 2.4.14 or 15pre are ok, too. The same LL patch should work.
>
> I applied the 2.4.15pre1AA patch on 2.4.14 (with some very small
> modifications), and the results are horrible.
>
At Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:26:23 +0100,
Maarten de Boer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
> their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of
> the several combinations, categorising on:
>
> - processor
> - SMP
> - kernel version
> - kernel
Hello,
I am thinking of setting up a webpage, where people can post
their latencytest results, so we can keep an inventory of
the several combinations, categorising on:
- processor
- SMP
- kernel version
- kernel patch
- kernel configuration
--- processor
--- SMP
--- ??
- tuning
--- vm
--- hdp
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 21:47:02 +0100
Andy Lo-A-Foe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 07:54:41PM +0100, Maarten de Boer wrote:
>
> > Your results look good. For what processor did you compile your kernel?
>
> CONFIG_MK7=y
>
> Did I read correctly that some 3DNow instructions ca
Vincent Touquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an Athlon too.
> Is it true that there are issues with the lowlatency patches
> (Andrew Morton's as well as the kernel pre-emption patches) and the
> optimizations used in the kernel for the Athlon processor ?
>
> If so, do I need to compile for
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think 2.4.14 or 15pre are ok, too. The same LL patch should work.
I applied the 2.4.15pre1AA patch on 2.4.14 (with some very small
modifications), and the results are horrible.
http://www.iua.upf.es/~mdeboer/latency/2.4.14-15pre1AA/3x256.html
Maarten
18 matches
Mail list logo
