--cut---
*Are* any of creative's competitors releasing specs for chips that do
advanced effects? I understand RME and MidiMan have been quite open,
but they use FPGA chips, and am I right in thinking those are
off-the-shelf chips with already open specs?
FPGA (= 'Field Programmable Gate
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:16:46 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
discriminate. ;-/ And the receiver takes the hit, AFAIKT the payer
doesn't pay anything.
Erm, it doesn't really make any difference who has to pay!
- Steve
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:40:56 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Initially, Final Scratch will only be available for
Linux and BeOS operating systems running on an
Intel compatible CPU. A Mac version is planned.
I can't imagine anyone releasing anything for BeOS anymore.
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 08:47, Pieter wrote:
--cut---
*Are* any of creative's competitors releasing specs for chips that do
advanced effects? I understand RME and MidiMan have been quite open,
but they use FPGA chips, and am I right in thinking those are
off-the-shelf chips with already
After actually looking at the rme site, it appears that their cards
aren't actually a good example of openness for creative to follow;
they're concerned about the dsp functions on their chips (reverb and
what-not.) Still, it shows them some of their competitors are not so
secretive.
precisely.
--- quote from s3000xl manual, pg. 261 ---
Start:
Here, you can set the method by which a take will commence playback.
The options are:
IMMEDIATE - This will cause the take to commence playback as soon as
you press PRME - F8.
MIDI NOTE - This will cause the take to playback when it
Greetings:
Thanks for the message, Paul. I teach at a local music store, so I
asked the owners if they'd ever heard of Stanton. I didn't realize what
a profile they have in the DJ industry, they're definitely a big name,
and this news is definitely good.
Btw, has anyone ever used (or know
although there might be something interesting in here, i can't help
but feel revulsion at what appears to me to be an amazing level of
bullshit marketing obfuscation here:
http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM02/Content/Hartmann_Music/PR/Neuron.html
the idea, however, seems pretty cool to have
I'd still like to know if there are any other companies out there giving
out specs for their dsp chips.. can anyone canonically tell me yay or
nay?
Certainly for conventional DSP chips, like the TI, Motorola and Analog
Devices families, there are reams upon reams of user-level documentation,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Robert Jonsson wrote:
Here's a project to do some more LADSPA plugs, I found it just the other day.
Haven't tried any of it, have no idea what they are aimed at.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jezabel/
I don't think this guy is on the list. It would be nice:
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 14:51, Paul Davis wrote:
precisely. rme are quite happy releasing specs to right a driver; they
are not planning on releasing specs to write new FX. its worth noting
that rme have said publically that it took them quite a long time and
quite a lot of really deep
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:10:56 +0100
Vincent Touquet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting that stanton are selling it, I don't think they developed it,
could be wrong though.
They mention on their site that some people in the Netherlands developed it.
Dunno if they were Stanton employees.
I
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 14:51, Paul Davis wrote:
precisely. rme are quite happy releasing specs to right a driver; they
are not planning on releasing specs to write new FX. its worth noting
that rme have said publically that it took them quite a long time and
quite a lot of really deep
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 14:14, Bob Ham wrote:
I'd still like to know if there are any other companies out there giving
out specs for their dsp chips.. can anyone canonically tell me yay or
nay?
Should have been more specific: any *sound card* companies giving out
specs for their (sound card)
Yes, that rings a bell. I think it was on the S3000 at least,
it was only stereo+monophonic, but if it had instant start it
must have chached (the scsi controller in the 3000 was very slow).
The Akai S1100 and S3200 (and S3000 with an upgrade) could play back
recordings from hard disk. I'm
Hm, but as they will be using their own distro of Linux,
they _have_ to provide the sources (thank you GPL).
Of course not for their application,
but that who prevents you from copying the binary and using it
on another system ?
The fact that they are using Linux is just great by itself.
If I
Have a look here:
http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM02/Content/Native_Instruments/PR/Kontakt.html
Marek
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:12:17AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:16:46 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
discriminate. ;-/ And the receiver takes the hit, AFAIKT the payer
doesn't pay anything.
Erm, it doesn't really make any difference who has to pay!
Sure it does.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:52:13AM +, Steve Harris wrote:
If they're smart, they'll add LADSPA support. That would be way cool.
I don't think they'd want to do that.
Running out of cpu juice could compromise thier time tracking code and
make it unreliable.
Hmm, maybe so. didn't
19 matches
Mail list logo
