Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread xk
HA HA HA HA I meant "\usr\friendly". HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA And jfm3, your security key makes my Windows Microsoft Outlook Express feel sick. jfm3 wrote: == >HAHAHAHAHAHAA > >You said "usr friendly".

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread jfm3
HAHAHAHAHAHAA You said "usr friendly". On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 19:30, xk wrote: > You have a rather simplistic view of the world :) > Not all people know how to compile a plugin or how to work in Linux, which > is still far from beeing as usr friendly as Windows is. > > - Original Message ---

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread xk
You have a rather simplistic view of the world :) Not all people know how to compile a plugin or how to work in Linux, which is still far from beeing as usr friendly as Windows is. - Original Message - From: Joachim Backhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I see no reason that Windows and DOS exist

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Frank Barknecht
Steve Harris hat gesagt: // Steve Harris wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:56:23 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > > > As much as I like your way and as much as I would like to understand it > > better, I would prefer a more general C or even better C++ tutorial. > > Making the work easier wit

[linux-audio-dev] [ot] perl python php

2002-02-13 Thread Frank Barknecht
Steve Harris hat gesagt: // Steve Harris wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:56:23 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > (The makestub.pl indeed needs a cleanup. I found myself constantly > > cleaning up my Perl code, so I am now happily learning and coding in > > Python, but that shall not start a

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: ALSA is in 2.5!!!

2002-02-13 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, D. Stimits wrote: > Just curious, is the integration based on the "stable" (less useful) > version of ALSA, or one of the "devel" versions? It's the latest 0.9.x version of ALSA. All features, drivers, bells and whistles are included. ;) -- http://www.eca.cx Audio softw

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA is in 2.5!!!

2002-02-13 Thread Jay Ts
Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > This is great news! This is not just great news - it is _amazingly_ great news(!). Within just a week, the two most major "roadblocks" keeping me from developing Linux music/audio apps have been "fixed". Now we have virtual commitment from the kernel developers for supp

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA is in 2.5!!!

2002-02-13 Thread D. Stimits
Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > This is great news! > > Congratulations to the ALSA team and to all who've contributed to the > effort. This is of course just the beginning. Hopefully the merge will not > only increase the number of incoming bug reports, but also the number of > incoming new developers.

[linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA is in 2.5!!!

2002-02-13 Thread Kai Vehmanen
This is great news! Congratulations to the ALSA team and to all who've contributed to the effort. This is of course just the beginning. Hopefully the merge will not only increase the number of incoming bug reports, but also the number of incoming new developers. :) On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Jaroslav

RE: [linux-audio-dev] LJ Firenze report

2002-02-13 Thread STEFFL, ERIK *Internet* (SBCSI)
one of the presentations was for demudi (debian based multi-media distro) - I just checked their web page and it seems like the latest update was on october 2001. anybody knows more details? is the project dead? on hiatus? erik > -Original Message- > From: Dave Phillips [mailto

Re: [linux-audio-dev] query

2002-02-13 Thread Alexander Ehlert
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 17:39, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > bigger than the overlap you used before. So far the basic idea. Happy > > implementing :-) > > Is that how the non-pitch-changing one works? That's how sox does it, I suppose. But that only works for a limited range. If you try to stretch it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] query

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:39:09 -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > On 13 Feb 2002, Alexander Ehlert wrote: > > > The basic idea for a simple time stretch is to subdivide your signal > > into overlapping windows. Next you would apply a so called windowing > > function to that window (Kaiser, Hamming,

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Paul Davis
>> MAIA does not exist. > >What is this: http://www.linuxdj.com/mucos/ ? AFAIK, its a completely dead project. >> This is the first time I have ever heard of OX_API. > >The API of GNU octal >http://www.gnu.org/software/octal/ I notice that the octal mailing list has seen no significant activit

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Joachim Backhaus wrote: > > An interesting question, to be sure. > > http://jackit.sf.net/faq/ compares > > a lot of plugin and host frameworks, which might give you a start. > > Perhaps, but I get a 404 - not found message. > > Is http://jackit.sourceforge.net/docs/faq.ph

Re: [linux-audio-dev] query

2002-02-13 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On 13 Feb 2002, Alexander Ehlert wrote: > The basic idea for a simple time stretch is to subdivide your signal > into overlapping windows. Next you would apply a so called windowing > function to that window (Kaiser, Hamming, Hanning, a triangle). > Afterwards you sum up those windows with an ove

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Joachim Backhaus
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 16:42 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's > > > >why do so much different Plug In API's exist > >(it seems that every application has it's

[linux-audio-dev] LJ Firenze report

2002-02-13 Thread Dave Phillips
Greetings: Those of you who attended the event may recall that I promised to submit my notes to the Linux Journal. I did so, and never heard about it again. I mistakenly assumed that Richard rejected the article: While searching for something else I came across this URL: http://www.lin

Re: [linux-audio-dev] query

2002-02-13 Thread Alexander Ehlert
On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 10:53, Swapnil Padhye wrote: > i want to strech a audio file. how can i do that > Is it possible to do so in java or any programming language??? if yes then what is >the exact procedure?? *g* I'd say this is possible in any programming language that provides you wit

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial

2002-02-13 Thread Paul Davis
>> alsa, "properly linked" means either learning quite a lot about the >> linker or using libtool, neither one of which i relish :) > >Libtool won't* correctly build LADSPA plugins. It thinks the're libraries >and makes some assumptions. i got it to work for quasimodo plugins. but yes, it is tric

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Paul Davis
>why do so much different Plug In API's exist >(it seems that every application has it's own API)? for the same reason that so many operating systems exist. >Wouldn't it be much more efficient to bundle >the power to one superb API? > >E.g. I have found LADSPA, MAIA and OX_API. MAIA does not ex

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Frank Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is also a graphical program that creates the XML, GDAM. The link to > it on ladspa.org is dead though. Yes, that should be http://www.ffem.org/gdam nowadays. Frank

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Joachim Backhaus
> -Original Message- > From: Andy Wingo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 16:25 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's > > > An interesting question, to be sure. > http://jackit.sf.net/faq/ compares > a lot of plu

Re: [linux-audio-dev] query

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:53:17 -, Swapnil Padhye wrote: > > Dear sir, > > i want to strech a audio file. how can i do that If you want to do it using an existing tool, try "sox stretch". If you wanto to write your own code, do a web search for "sinc interpolation" it can be done in

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Andy Wingo
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Joachim Backhaus wrote: > > Hi, > > why do so much different Plug In API's exist > (it seems that every application has it's own API)? > > Wouldn't it be much more efficient to bundle > the power to one superb API? > > E.g. I have found LADSPA, MAIA and OX_API. > > But L

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:16:42 -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote: > > More or less. Some of them include static libraries written in C. For eg. > > gverb, which was written by Juhana Sadeharju, there is just a simple XML+C > > wrapper that calles the library functions. > > There is also a graphical pr

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Joachim Backhaus wrote: > why do so much different Plug In API's exist > (it seems that every application has it's own API)? It is easier to design an API then to implement it. > Wouldn't it be much more efficient to bundle > the power to one superb API? Well, different AP

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Steve Harris wrote: > > > generate the raw C source. I think it saves a lot of grunt work, > > > but it > > > > That would be super cool! Is that how you make all of your plugins? > > More or less. Some of them include static libraries written in C. For eg. > gverb, which w

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Joachim Backhaus
> -Original Message- > From: Joachim Backhaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 15:39 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's > > But LADSPA seems to be the online one of them ^^ I can't

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:57:37 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > > alsa, "properly linked" means either learning quite a lot about the > linker or using libtool, neither one of which i relish :) Libtool won't* correctly build LADSPA plugins. It thinks the're libraries and makes some assumptions. - S

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:56:23 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > (The makestub.pl indeed needs a cleanup. I found myself constantly > cleaning up my Perl code, so I am now happily learning and coding in > Python, but that shall not start a Perl-Python discussion, please.) Yes, I tried to give up

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:56:23 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > As much as I like your way and as much as I would like to understand it > better, I would prefer a more general C or even better C++ tutorial. > Making the work easier with XML and Perl might be too off-topic in the > tutorial I a

[linux-audio-dev] Different Plug In API's

2002-02-13 Thread Joachim Backhaus
Hi, why do so much different Plug In API's exist (it seems that every application has it's own API)? Wouldn't it be much more efficient to bundle the power to one superb API? E.g. I have found LADSPA, MAIA and OX_API. But LADSPA seems to be the online one of them which is further developed.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Harris
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:16:18 -0800, Tim Westbrook wrote: > > > You've seen how I do it, write it in XML wrapped C, then use perl > > to > > generate the raw C source. I think it saves a lot of grunt work, > > but it > > That would be super cool! Is that how you make all of your plugins? Mor

RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Writing Tutorial [was: tracker with midi input]

2002-02-13 Thread mikko.a.helin
> PS The analogue oscilator that I used to distrubte was very > very bad. It's > removed in the current release. I will write another when I > have a good > understanding of band-limited oscilators. > Then write just a sine osc. -Mikko

[linux-audio-dev] query

2002-02-13 Thread Swapnil Padhye
Dear sir, i want to strech a audio file. how can i do that Is it possible to do so in java or any programming language??? if yes then what is the exact procedure?? Kindly helpme in doing so. Thanking you. Swapnil Padhye