Hello,
I sent the following to the ALSA list, but did not get any answer, so I
repost it here, hoping anybody has delt with this before.
First, I noticed that the alsa rtctimer is not compiled when you have
the RTC in your kernel as a module. The problem is in
alsa-kernel/core/Makefile, where C
* Paul Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >maybe i'm missing something somewhere, but is there a reason why i can't
> >seem to get audio processing via async handlers to work reliably?
>
> i have explained before on the alsa-devel list that the async handling
> stuff in ALSA is fundamentally inco
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:40:58PM -0500, rm wrote:
>
> is anyone successfully using a laptop for doing low latency audio
> development? if so which brands and models? (i've seen rme-audio's
> list, but it's a bit outdated now). a few of the sony models look
> cool, like the r505.
>
> the ibook
Greets,
Just wanted to point out, for those of you
not on linux-audio-user, there is a discussion
going on over there regarding a new dynamic community-driven
site intended to supercede DLP's excellent software list.
I've volunteered to develop this site, with help
from whoever's willing. Current
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:40:58 -0500, rm wrote:
>
> is anyone successfully using a laptop for doing low latency audio
> development? if so which brands and models? (i've seen rme-audio's
> list, but it's a bit outdated now). a few of the sony models look
> cool, like the r505.
I'm using an del
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:35:59 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >At least one person is dlopen-ing LADSPA plugins with RTLD_GLOBAL, and this
> >can potentially cause problems with plugins that have clashing globals.
>
> as at least one of those people, i should note that this occurs only
> because i
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:35:59 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >At least one person is dlopen-ing LADSPA plugins with RTLD_GLOBAL, and this
> >can potentially cause problems with plugins that have clashing globals.
>
> as at least one of those people, i should note that this occurs only
> because i
is anyone successfully using a laptop for doing low latency audio
development? if so which brands and models? (i've seen rme-audio's
list, but it's a bit outdated now). a few of the sony models look
cool, like the r505.
the ibook seems nice, no pcmcia though; are there any firewire or usb
interf
>maybe i'm missing something somewhere, but is there a reason why i can't
>seem to get audio processing via async handlers to work reliably?
i have explained before on the alsa-devel list that the async handling
stuff in ALSA is fundamentally incompatible with POSIX. you are not
allowed to do ver
maybe i'm missing something somewhere, but is there a reason why i can't
seem to get audio processing via async handlers to work reliably?
i'm using andrew morton's kernel patch for 2.4.18.and i can crank the
latency test program all the way down to 64 frames with no trouble. but
when i try
>At least one person is dlopen-ing LADSPA plugins with RTLD_GLOBAL, and this
>can potentially cause problems with plugins that have clashing globals.
as at least one of those people, i should note that this occurs only
because i am using the g_module library, which uses RTLD_GLOBAL
implicitly. it
At least one person is dlopen-ing LADSPA plugins with RTLD_GLOBAL, and this
can potentially cause problems with plugins that have clashing globals.
Given that LADSPA plugins shouldn't be exporting global variables to the
rest of the world anyway it would be better if this didn't cause any
problem
Andy Main wrote:
>
> Sorry guys
>
> My mailbox is too busy now, and I've lost the message with the majordomo
> command - can someone mail it to me or tell me how to get off this list
>
> Thanks
>
> Andy.
http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/subscribe.php3#subscription
Sorry guys
My mailbox is too busy now, and I've lost the message with the majordomo
command - can someone mail it to me or tell me how to get off this list
Thanks
Andy.
It may be easier to buy quieter fans, but it could be more fun to try the
following:
http://www.analog.com/library/analogDialogue/archives/34-02/noise/
Matthew
- Original Message -
From: "Maarten de Boer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday
* Paul Winkler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The drives have much less annoying whine than my "old" maxtor & seagate
> 4 GB drives, but the clicky noises (is that seeking?) are still
> quite audible. Anyway, it's down to the point where I can listen to
> music in the room with the PC and not feel
[...]
> The drives have much less annoying whine than my \"old\" maxtor & seagate
> 4 GB drives, but the clicky noises (is that seeking?) are still
> quite audible.
I think most recent drives have an acoustic management feature that should
improve this. There was an article in the german \"c\'t
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:12:38PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> www.quietpc.com - I have thier powersupply which is good, can't speak for
> anyhitng else.
I have a PSU from them and also a CPU fan for my PIII which is drastically
quieter than what I had before. My hard drives are now the loudest
Hi,
To make sound cancelation with anti-sound possible the
both sound sources would have to genetrate theier sound
>excactly< at the same physical position - otherwise you will
always recognize phase shifts between the two sources
of sounds depending on your current distance form the
sound so
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 12:46, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> i have been thinking about the following before, and now
> that i read about it on slashdot, and it got me thinking
> a bit more.
>
> the issue is sound cancelation. the article mentioned
> on slashdot,
> http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.
Hi,
Haven't read the article yet. However, this is a technique sometimes used in
very loud industries where sound is predictable as to location and content.
There might be issues with this approach with placement of the cancelation
speaker. It has to be placed VERY close the originator of the
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:46:58 +0200, Maarten de Boer wrote:
> any suggestions / remarks?
Buy quieter fans! It will be better + easier + cheaper than a sound
cancellation apporach.
www.quietpc.com - I have thier powersupply which is good, can't speak for
anyhitng else.
- Steve
i have been thinking about the following before, and now
that i read about it on slashdot, and it got me thinking
a bit more.
the issue is sound cancelation. the article mentioned
on slashdot,
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns2094
talks about a (very expensive) general approach
This should be of interest to some list readers.
Glasgow's Centre for Music Technology (http://cmt.gla.ac.uk) is looking for
a Linux-competent programmer with skills in audio programming to support a
project with the Animation Industry. We want to build a toolset to
create/display/transport anim
24 matches
Mail list logo
