On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 02:25:41PM -0700, John Lazzaro wrote:
>
> Without a standards document that precisely defines the semantics of
> a language, there's no way to know what the language is. Even _you_
> don't really know without the document -- every change to the existing
> codebase is a deci
Hi all,
I was just wondering if RME Hammerfall can be used for Dolby surround
output via its optical (SPDIF) output going into an AC-3 decoder. Is
this something that is supported in the current drivers (in Win/Mac
obviously since Linux drivers are not ready yet)? I am asking this since
I am wond
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 04:25 PM, John Lazzaro wrote:
>> Which of these languages has this been done for: Python Ruby Perl?
>> I think that there is only one code tree for each of these languages.
>> Are they condemned?
>
> Yes.
I'm sorry, I disagree with you.
--
--- james mccartney
Joshua Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> I would be happy to maintain libsndfile, though Stefan would probably be
> a good choice also. A lot will depend on whether H. S. Teoh is willing
> to give up maintainership. Debian developers are very territorial about
> their work,
> james mccartney writes
>
> Which of these languages has this been done for: Python Ruby Perl?
> I think that there is only one code tree for each of these languages.
> Are they condemned?
Yes.
Larry Rosler makes the case for Perl standardization:
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2000/06/rosler.htm
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 03:57 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
> There are actually two python interpreter implementations,
> one in C (the standard python distribution) and one in Java
> (commonly called Jython).
>
Was it necessary for the language to be formally adopted by some
standards bod
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:25:15PM -0500, James McCartney wrote:
>
> On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 02:50 PM, John Lazzaro wrote:
>
> >submit the SuperCollider
> >language to be an open standard
> >Without taking this step, you're condemning the SC language to a
> >lifetime limited to the prac
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 02:50 PM, John Lazzaro wrote:
> submit the SuperCollider
> language to be an open standard
> Without taking this step, you're condemning the SC language to a
> lifetime limited to the practical lifetime of your implementation(s).
Which of these languages has thi
> --- james mccartney writes
>
> But things have a way of changing in life, so you might sit tight and
> see what happens.
Taking the long view, its more interesting to submit the SuperCollider
language to be an open standard, and to permit royalty-free licensing
for any patents you may have re
* Erik de Castro Lopo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:08:50 +0200
> Enrique Robledo Arnuncio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, you won't need to search hard. It is good practice for Debian
> > developers to contact the autor of the software they package, but it
> > seems
Paul Davis wrote:
> oh, i remember. the example capture client uses it. "depends" is
> perhaps too strong a word. "will build some extra sample clients if
> libsndfile is present" is better, though as usual with me, more
> verbose :)
Ok... I have to admit that I didn't check _what_ exactly in th
>snd-dmotif) and I'm going to upload jack (the audio server), which
>depends on libsndfile,
oh, i remember. the example capture client uses it. "depends" is
perhaps too strong a word. "will build some extra sample clients if
libsndfile is present" is better, though as usual with me, more
verbose
>That could be me :-) I'm no debian maintainer right now, but I'm in the
>new maintainer queue, have two sponsored packages in debian (snd and
>snd-dmotif) and I'm going to upload jack (the audio server), which
>depends on libsndfile,
it does? news to me :)
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> What I am looking for is a Debian maintainer who is especially interested
> in audio who might want to take over from H. S. Teoh. It would be even
> better if it was the maintainer of another Debian package which depends
> on libsndfile.
That could be me :-) I'm no
>I do not have anything against Linux and I am not an Apple robot/zombie.
>It has taken me some time to get SC ported to MacOSX. I'm still not done
>with that. I have always said that after that I would look at a linux
>port. I would like to do that.
James: you may want to consider taking a lo
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 10:27 AM, Kasper Souren wrote:
> So I would like to know why you don't want SC to be GPL'd. Is it
> because of the money or are there other reasons? I suppose you can't
> live of the money you get from people registering anyway - or am I
> wrong?
I have been
James McCartney wrote:
>
> OK I've been clued into this thread and will give my 2 cents.
>
> I do not have anything against Linux and I am not an Apple robot/zombie.
> It has taken me some time to get SC ported to MacOSX. I'm still not done
> with that. I have always said that after that I wou
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:08:50 +0200
Enrique Robledo Arnuncio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you won't need to search hard. It is good practice for Debian
> developers to contact the autor of the software they package, but it
> seems this one did not... :)
>
> http://packages.debian.org/unstab
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 05:47:03PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm on the lookout for a Debian maintainer with an interest in audio. I
> am very near to releasing version 1 of libsndfile and want to find a
> package maintainer.
>
> Anyone inetrested should email me at : [EMA
Hi all,
I'm on the lookout for a Debian maintainer with an interest in audio. I
am very near to releasing version 1 of libsndfile and want to find a
package maintainer.
Anyone inetrested should email me at : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Erik
--
+--
20 matches
Mail list logo
