On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:11:05PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >> I don't know what balanced drivers are.
> >
> >Balanced I/O. Professional grade.
>
> its related to the wiring of the connectors and the voltage level that
> corresponds to 0dB. footnote: this has nothing to do with "drivers"
> in
>> I don't know what balanced drivers are.
>
>Balanced I/O. Professional grade.
its related to the wiring of the connectors and the voltage level that
corresponds to 0dB. footnote: this has nothing to do with "drivers"
in the software sense :)
>As to the AudioScience cards, they are common in r
On Friday 24 May 2002 01:12 pm, Mark Rages wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:47:07PM +1200, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> > - analog and digital audio I/O, balanced drivers
> I don't know what balanced drivers are.
Balanced I/O. Professional grade.
As to the AudioScience cards, they are comm
Hi,
> I'd like some idea how hard it would be to write an ALSA driver either
> as a
> compatibility layer on top of our existing driver, or from the ground
> up. I
> realise that this is rather a broad question, so please consider this an
> invitation to enter discussion, rather than a request
On Friday 24 May 2002 01:47, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> I'd like some idea how hard it would be to write an ALSA driver either as a
> compatibility layer on top of our existing driver, or from the ground up.
> I realise that this is rather a broad question, so please consider this an
> invita
> Maybe we should consider a rethink on the meaning of LADSPA port
> types, as clearly it is not the case that a LADSPA_PORT_AUDIO type
> port will always recieve what is considered 'audio' data?
The main reasoning behind the design of ssm is that there is no distinction
between control and aud
Hi,
Taybin Rutkin hat gesagt: // Taybin Rutkin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
> > LADSPA currently makes audio+control ports orthogonal to each other. i
> > don't think there are any LADSPA hosts at this time that allow the
> > user to connect the ports "by hand" ...
> Doesn't GL
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 06:55:51 +0200, Dr. Matthias Nagorni wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > The right choice imho. More to the point, you can coonect control or audio
> > output to audio inputs, so you can do what you'de like with an audio rate
> > resonace/cutoff input.
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:47:07PM +1200, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I work for AudioScience (www.audioscience.com)
>
> We make excellent (how could I say otherwise) audio cards.
...
> I'd like some idea how hard it would be to write an ALSA driver either as a
> compatibility l
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
> The right choice imho. More to the point, you can coonect control or audio
> output to audio inputs, so you can do what you'de like with an audio rate
> resonace/cutoff input.
I'm currently implementing the filters with audio ports for both frequency
and
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:15:45 -0400
Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> You mean dynamic resonance control at _audio_ rate ? I would assume
> >> that being able to feed envelopes and LFO up to perhaps 10 Hz is
> >> sufficient for the resonance port ?
> >
> >You can get some fantasic effect
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:37:02 +0200, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> > LADSPA currently makes audio+control ports orthogonal to each other.
> > i don't think there are any LADSPA hosts at this time that allow the
> > user to connect the ports "by hand" ...
>
> Well, you can connect audio signals to
> LADSPA currently makes audio+control ports orthogonal to each other.
> i don't think there are any LADSPA hosts at this time that allow the
> user to connect the ports "by hand" ...
Well, you can connect audio signals to LADSPA control inputs in ssm, but of
course, it just uses the first samp
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
> LADSPA currently makes audio+control ports orthogonal to each other. i
> don't think there are any LADSPA hosts at this time that allow the
> user to connect the ports "by hand" ...
Doesn't GLAME let you draw lines between LADSPA plugins?
Taybin
>> You mean dynamic resonance control at _audio_ rate ? I would assume that
>> being able to feed envelopes and LFO up to perhaps 10 Hz is
>> sufficient for the resonance port ?
>
>You can get some fantasic effects modulating cutoff at near audio rate or
>above :)
the problem is that a LADSPA h
On Fri, 24 May 2002 10:32:22 +0200 (CEST)
"Dr. Matthias Nagorni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > one would hope that you implemented them all as LADSPA plugins so
> > that your hard work can be used by many different audio applications
> > ... Well, yes,
I don't intend to use this plugin as an "audio sequenzer".
SFAcid, the windows app, IS a sequenzer, but what I'd like to program
is a plugin capable of adding the special Acid feature to any ladspa
audio sequenzer. I think ladspa can do the job, but a jack app might be a
better solution.
Vivien
> You mean dynamic resonance control at _audio_ rate ? I would assume that
> being able to feed envelopes and LFO up to perhaps 10 Hz is
> sufficient for the resonance port ?
You can get some fantasic effects modulating cutoff at near audio rate or
above :)
Dave
: www.pawfal.org :
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivien Guillet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Freitag, 24. Mai 2002 12:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Acid-like player using ladspa plugin
>
>
> Do you think it's possible ? And what about using it in an audio
> sequencer ?
Why
Hello
First of all, I'd like to thank you for all the great job you're doing.
I've been trying to use free software in replacement for windows and co
for more than two years. I still not achieved in doing that, but I can
feel it's getting closer every day...
I use SF Acid almost each day because
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Stefan Kost wrote:
> Dynamic resonance control *is* important, whithout it there would be nearly no
>techno/electro music at all.
> So having three input would be IMHO the way to go.
You mean dynamic resonance control at _audio_ rate ? I would assume that
being able to feed
Dr. Matthias Nagorni wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>
>>one would hope that you implemented them all as LADSPA plugins so that
>>your hard work can be used by many different audio applications ...
>
> Well, yes, of course I thought about implementing them as LADSPA plugin.
>
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
> one would hope that you implemented them all as LADSPA plugins so that
> your hard work can be used by many different audio applications ...
Well, yes, of course I thought about implementing them as LADSPA plugin.
But here we are again: My VCF module has t
23 matches
Mail list logo
