Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1 Alternative Proposal

2002-05-29 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:46:03PM +1000, Conrad Parker wrote: > I'll deal with each in turn, but preface this by clarifying that we are > only talking about control ports, not audio ports, because: > > * conceptually, we're only talking about default parameters; > default audio input

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1 Alternative Proposal

2002-05-29 Thread Conrad Parker
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:51:56PM +0100, Richard W.E. Furse wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Goetze > > Sent: 29 May 2002 22:32 > [...] > > >totally agree -- Tim's solution doesn't break binary compatability, > > > >

RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1 Alternative Proposal

2002-05-29 Thread Richard W.E. Furse
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Goetze > Sent: 29 May 2002 22:32 [...] > >totally agree -- Tim's solution doesn't break binary compatability, > > richard pointed out that it'd actually break binary compatibility with > hosts that

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1 Alternative Proposal

2002-05-29 Thread Tim Goetze
Conrad Parker wrote: >by making the defaults an outcome of connect_port() instead, we get a >dynamic mechanism for free. Default frequencies can be related to the >sample rate, etc. now you mention it, yes, that's a very welcome side effect i think. >totally agree -- Tim's solution doesn't brea

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing a driver for this card: your thoughts?

2002-05-29 Thread Fred Gleason
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 14:22, Lamar Owen wrote: > But then the amplifier is *producing* sound rather than *reproducing* > sound, and has become a form of compressor. A compressor with some > interesting curves, maybe, but a compressor nonethless. And a compressor > one can model and produce i

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing a driver for this card: your thoughts?

2002-05-29 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 02:50 pm, Paul Winkler wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:22:09PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > > interesting curves, maybe, but a compressor nonethless. And a compressor > > one can model and produce identical characteristics in effects plugins. > > :-) > In theory, yes.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing a driver for this card: your thoughts?

2002-05-29 Thread Paul Winkler
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 02:22:09PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday 29 May 2002 11:18 am, Paul Winkler wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:43:14PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > Class A design has it's strong points. As long as you are in a good > > > linear portion of the transconductan

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing a driver for this card: your thoughts?

2002-05-29 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 11:18 am, Paul Winkler wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:43:14PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > > Class A design has it's strong points. As long as you are in a good > > linear portion of the transconductance curve you're OK. > As a sometime guitarist, I'd say Class A has

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing a driver for this card: your thoughts?

2002-05-29 Thread Taybin Rutkin
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Paul Winkler wrote: > Hey Taybin, I know you weren't really into that Sleater-Kinney show, > but how did you like that Vox AC-30 that Carrie plays through? Oh yeah! Her sound was great. Real warm. Taybin

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing a driver for this card: your thoughts?

2002-05-29 Thread Paul Winkler
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:43:14PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: > Class A design has it's strong points. As long as you are in a good linear > portion of the transconductance curve you're OK. As a sometime guitarist, I'd say Class A has its strong points well into distortion... Hey Taybin, I know y

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Super news from SuperCollider

2002-05-29 Thread Paul Sladen
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Frank Barknecht wrote: > http://www.audiosynth.com/whyfree.html Ww! I'm glad you've got `proper job'--I need to do the same myself! After you've got yourself sorted out and re-organised again, if you do a brief on what needs removing of MacZoop, and make an initial rel

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1 Alternative Proposal

2002-05-29 Thread Dr. Matthias Nagorni
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Conrad Parker wrote: > regarding the provision of default values in LADSPA, I totally support > Tim's suggestion -- in fact, I reckon it is brilliant for reasons I'll > outline below :) [...] > All this requires is that a plugin suggest default values in the way > Tim propose

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Super news from SuperCollider

2002-05-29 Thread James McCartney
On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 02:49 AM, Jo:rn Nettingsmeier wrote: > i'm looking forward to the code release. have you already made up your > mind which license you are going to use for the parts you own the > copyright of ? > GPL most likely. -- --- james mccartney [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Super news from SuperCollider

2002-05-29 Thread Jo : rn Nettingsmeier
Frank Barknecht wrote: > > Hi, > > SuperCollider will be free: > http://www.audiosynth.com/whyfree.html > if this was Slashdot I would say: "First post!!". YEEEHAH ! thanks james for opening up such a great piece of code, and all the best for your new job. i'm looking forward to the code relea