Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
>
> ...
> diff -urN linux-2.4.19-pre7/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c
> linux-2.4.19-pre7-jl1-ll/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c
> --- linux-2.4.19-pre7/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.cWed Aug 8 19:42:15 2001
> +++ linux-2.4.19-pre7-jl1-ll/drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c Mon A
On 05 Jun 2002 20:11:55 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 17:11, Juan Linietsky wrote:
> > On 05 Jun 2002 05:09:17 -0600
> > Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > To LAD list members:
> > > I'm aware that there is a new Linux Audio Announce list, but I
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 17:11, Juan Linietsky wrote:
> On 05 Jun 2002 05:09:17 -0600
> Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To LAD list members:
> > I'm aware that there is a new Linux Audio Announce list, but I
> > thought that since this is an initial release announcement, all
> > would be
And talking with two friends, I think the evidence points there. Two
friends had blown Athlons after one month. Both had fan problems, one
quit altogether and burned it out within minutes. (Smoke) Second I
think the fan was just not cool enough.
Rick
Wednesday, June 05, 2002, you wrote:
BC>
On 05 Jun 2002 05:09:17 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To LAD list members:
> I'm aware that there is a new Linux Audio Announce list, but I
> thought that since this is an initial release announcement, all
> would be forgiven :)
>
> Swami 0.9.0pre1 has been released. Swami is the
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:42:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> A number of PCI video cards hang onto the PCI bus
> for outrageous amounts of time. It gives better
> benchmarks in Windows magazines.
>
> You may be getting bitten by this; dunno. Some xfree drivers
> have an option to not use th
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:10:56PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:40, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
> > ** mga driver
>
> Is that the matrox driver, or the xfree86 driver? I always use the
> (open source, I might add for all you nvidia owners) matrox drivers.
> The xfree
Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
>
> ...
> > fragment latency = 2.902494 ms
> > cpu latency = 2.321995 ms
> > 3.3ms ( 0)|
> > 1MS num_time_samples=21477 num_times_within_1ms=21477 factor=100.00
> > 2MS num_time_samples=21477 num_times_within_2ms=21477 factor=100.00
>
> Or in other word
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:40, Enrique Robledo Arnuncio wrote:
> * XFree86 version: 4.1.0.1
> ** mga driver
> * G. Card: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 04)
Is that the matrox driver, or the xfree86 driver? I always use the
(open source, I might add for all you nvidia owners) matrox
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 12:28, Brian Redfern wrote:
> This is terrific software, I'm teaching myself c++ right now just to get
> involved in improving this software. With projects like this I can soon
> sell the rest of my old outboard gear. :-)
>
Doesn't use C++ :) Its C using GObject which is pa
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 05:02, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> On 04 Jun 2002 23:23:35 -0600
> Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What would happen in the current implementation? Would it be truncated?
> > What I am wondering is if I use sf_read_short () for loading all samples
> > regardless
Hi!
Running latencytest I have found a quite bad behaviour with the high
X11 load test when the X server has the DRI module loaded and active.
Is anyone there using DRI and lowlatency-patch at the same time?
Have you experienced this kind of problems?
Any known solution? I use OpenGL for real
This is terrific software, I'm teaching myself c++ right now just to get
involved in improving this software. With projects like this I can soon
sell the rest of my old outboard gear. :-)
Hi Josh,
very nice webpage! Nice design, don't you want to overhaul the glame
homepage, too ;-)
I'll have a look at swami soon.
Cheers, Alex
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 11:07, Dustin Barlow wrote:
> If it comes bunded with an 8-track player that fits in a drive bay, I'm in.
But of course! Check out the sample implementation:
http://64.80.162.66/cartPC1.jpg
Now what would you pay?
Cheers!
|-
Agree with most of the stuff below, but there is one difference between
the Intel and AMD chips you might find important. We put a fair amount
of effort into the Pentium 4 to have it self-monitor its temp. If it gets
too hot, the processor throttles its own performance until it has cooled
down. Th
If it comes bunded with an 8-track player that fits in a drive bay, I'm in.
:)
Dustin
>From: "xk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] OT Now I've seen everything (Audiophile
>related)
>Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:01:13 +0300
>
> fred, haven't you read their specs ??
> they have solved this any many more things. they use a "noise wall".
> which is really clever, because noise can't go through walls! and the
> tube combines analog warmth with digital technology, and they did some
> really brilliant stuff to their power su
To LAD list members:
I'm aware that there is a new Linux Audio Announce list, but I thought
that since this is an initial release announcement, all would be
forgiven :)
Swami 0.9.0pre1 has been released. Swami is the new name of the Smurf
Sound Font Editor. Along with the name change comes an ent
On 04 Jun 2002 23:23:35 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would happen in the current implementation? Would it be truncated?
> What I am wondering is if I use sf_read_short () for loading all samples
> regardless of format will it work correctly?
>From memory the problem was rea
On 04 Jun 2002 23:23:35 -0600
Josh Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would happen in the current implementation? Would it be truncated?
> What I am wondering is if I use sf_read_short () for loading all samples
> regardless of format will it work correctly?
>From memory the problem was rea
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 01:05, rm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 12:43:53AM -0600, Josh Green wrote:
> > I still don't completely understand what your goal is, could you
> > elaborate more on it? Then I can get a better idea of how these two
> > projects could be complementary :)
>
> basically, i
Fred Gleason wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 04 June 2002 12:56, David Matthews wrote:
>
> > Now that's just ridiculous. I love tubes as much as anyone, but what's the
> > point of using a tube amplifier with a cheapo motherboard DAC?
>
> I'd be more interested to see how they're generating the B+ volta
23 matches
Mail list logo
